"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. ... It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
-- Adam Smith
Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling | Media Reform | CeaseSPIN.org
(If you don't trust that source just google, Fox News goes to court to lie)
-JryanI'm coming to see that no matter what law we regulate, be it the stand your ground act, there is never an objective morally right answer to any morale question; in fact, since there are multiple objectively right answers to every moral question that leaves us with a lot of grey area and a lot of black area (not in the racial since).
You heard it here first, folks! An anonymous source equals NO source, LOL. Wikipedia, NY Times, Wiki leaks, CNN, CNBC, 60 Minutes, etc, have ALL been making up news stories all this time, telling lies that have no source. You guys are too much, sometimes....I used to like comedy central, but I find I don't NEED them anymore, I get all my laughs here.
"Half full or half empty doesn't matter. What matters is, you've only got half a glass...so what are you going to do about it?" - Me
Now, do you have any evidence that Fox's use of unnamed sources in investigations are more likely to be untrue then other new organizations use of unnamed sources in their investigations? I assume you don't, but this is Foxnews. Apparently facts just aren't necessary. Feelings are good enough for some.