That's why I said possibly. Jesus.
Just reiterating the point, and no I am no where near the level of Jesus. But thanks for the complement.
That is one of their main contentions, yes. Tea Partiers aren't in it for the long haul though. They could learn a lesson from OWS.
What ever you are talking about here is really convoluted. The Tea Party has made effective change in whom the elections are won by giving voice to the people trough the system, where as the OWS so far is going around breaking law, destroying the economy to a greater extent, and anarchy. In fact, any objective look at comparing the two in our system of government has to conclude that the Tea Party is the group making the more effective gains.
That's what commitment and resolve look like.
Really? I think it looks more like a giant out of control temper tantrum.
Sure, they don't have to go the route of Oakland, and many other OWS movements have been very peaceful and people have prescribe themselves to the boundary of law.
Really? You mean like the rape, theft, and assault? Like the blocking of traffic, noise, and trespass? You mean like the lack of permit, unlawful assembly, and harassment of homeowners, and by standers? That boundary of law?
But they don't stop, they don't give up, they keep coming back.
They haven't yet begun to feel the force of law.
One some level, there are at least a few admirable qualities about the movement in those terms of perseverance.
So far none that I can see, unless you count the ability to look and act like complete idiots.
Well put the two together and we get the big picture then. Tea Party and OWS, peanut butter and chocolate.
Not even close. the quasi Marxist message of wealth redistribution, coupled with extreme class warfare is not what would even win a plurality of the American sentiment much less a majority.
Not really. In one city in particular it has become very serious. In other cities there are minor clashes, and in still other cities it's perfectly peaceful.
So rape, even that of a minor, prostitution, drug use, assault, and the myriad of other laws and ordinances broken by these children are perfectly peaceful eh.....?
They certainly have admirable qualities too...I wouldn't mind seeing the Tea Party get a bit more aggressive though.
So as before your bent seems to want violent clash. Why? Do you really think that would be a positive thing for this country?
Both. I love protest, I love freedom, I love seeing it all in action. I love dissent, I love the People asserting themselves, I love to watch the government reel. I love this Republic, and understand that it must be kept through action of the people, I applaud all attempts to do just that.
Fine except that OWS doesn't want that....Their message seems to be one of greater government control through distribution of wealth and resource. Less freedom, less of the Republic and more of pure democracy, which is NOT what we are.
You for that?
I love questioning authority, I love my rights, I love my liberty, I love all those who rise up to stand for theirs.
Liberty is NOT what this group stands for.
I support both sides and their right to assemble and protest; to it's maximum. They are both faces of freedom.
Shouldn't they do it legally?
I've been perfectly clear, I fear that perhaps you have just overestimated your abilities to understand a bit though.
Ah, there it is...Since I think your position is convoluted and garbled, instead of clarifying just what the hell you are saying, you think it just easier to attack me by implying that I am too stupid to understand it....You know who else uses that tactic? Allenskite Marxist progressives.
j-mac