• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Facts will be the furthest thing from this story if the MSM has their way.

j-mac

it's the liberal media excuse again. It's never your guys fault, it's always the liberal media's fault. If you can't actually blame it on the media, just bitch about it to distract.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

it's the liberal media excuse again. It's never your guys fault, it's always the liberal media's fault. If you can't actually blame it on the media, just bitch about it to distract.

You tell me how a story about a woman 20 years ago, who was seemingly never approached directly by Cain is now some huge scandal?

j-mac
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

I really don't give a **** about Cain's sex life. The guy is another unqualified empty suit with a briefcase full of whacked-out, unworkable ideas that for some reason, a gullible percentage of the populace have bought into.

As for the woman who wants to give her side of the story, I urge her to have a heart-to-heart chat with Anita Hill first. What the politicians did to her was criminal. The woman and/or women involved in Cain's past indiscretions should remain invisible, for their own good. One side or another will crucify them just out of spite.
 
If you have a sexual allegation charge leveled against you, don't blame your rivals or the media. Blame Yourself! *Tea Party Crowd Claps*
BS. Anyone make a charge. If you are found guilty in a court of law, well that's another thing.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

The woman and/or women involved in Cain's past indiscretions should remain invisible, for their own good. One side or another will crucify them just out of spite.

If the charges are without merit they should be crucified, just as Anita Hill the liar was.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

You tell me how a story about a woman 20 years ago, who was seemingly never approached directly by Cain is now some huge scandal?

j-mac

I don't think it is a big huge scandal. However, Cain's past life is news. If you don't want your life examined to this level, you cannot run for office. Sorry, but your liberal media bull**** don't stand up to scrutiny.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

I really don't give a **** about Cain's sex life. The guy is another unqualified empty suit with a briefcase full of whacked-out, unworkable ideas that for some reason, a gullible percentage of the populace have bought into.

As for the woman who wants to give her side of the story, I urge her to have a heart-to-heart chat with Anita Hill first. What the politicians did to her was criminal. The woman and/or women involved in Cain's past indiscretions should remain invisible, for their own good. One side or another will crucify them just out of spite.


Wow the first paragraph could, and was said about Obama....Who did you vote for?


j-mac
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

I don't think it is a big huge scandal. However, Cain's past life is news. If you don't want your life examined to this level, you cannot run for office. Sorry, but your liberal media bull**** don't stand up to scrutiny.

Great, so like I thought this isn't about getting the best people for the job anymore, it is about getting only the candidates which can never be touched by opposition research for their entire lives. When the future studies the decline and fall of this great nation, remember we had a hand in this crap!

j-mac
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Wow the first paragraph could, and was said about Obama....Who did you vote for?


j-mac

I wrote in my vote. Wouldn't vote for Obama for those same reasons, he's not qualified, and wouldn't vote for Bush-lite and Bubblebrain either.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Great, so like I thought this isn't about getting the best people for the job anymore, it is about getting only the candidates which can never be touched by opposition research for their entire lives. When the future studies the decline and fall of this great nation, remember we had a hand in this crap!

j-mac

Is this what you said about Rev. Wright? Who cares about his past?

Just proves what I already said, if you've already decided to vote for him, nothing will change your mind. If you're looking for the best person for the job, you might want to look past Cain. I don't think he's it. Regardless of this charge and its veracity.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Great, so like I thought this isn't about getting the best people for the job anymore, it is about getting only the candidates which can never be touched by opposition research for their entire lives. When the future studies the decline and fall of this great nation, remember we had a hand in this crap!

j-mac

I did not say I liked it, I just said it was the reality. I did not whine and cry when the media reported negative stuff about Obama or Clinton's past and try and blame the media, and I am not doing it now. Too bad you are not that consistent.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Is this what you said about Rev. Wright? Who cares about his past?

Just proves what I already said, if you've already decided to vote for him, nothing will change your mind. If you're looking for the best person for the job, you might want to look past Cain. I don't think he's it. Regardless of this charge and its veracity.

to tell the truth, I wasn't a Cain guy anyway. I just am getting beside myself over the blatant hypocrisy on a daily basis now days.

j-mac
 
One of the women who accused GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment wants to tell her side of the story but is barred by a confidentiality agreement, her attorney in Washington said Tuesday.
Lawyer Joel P. Bennett called on the National Restaurant Association, where the woman and Cain worked in the late 1990s, to release the woman from her written promise not to talk about the allegations or disparage the trade group.





It is just frustrating that Herman Cain is going around bad-mouthing the two complainants, and my client is blocked by a confidentiality agreement,” Bennett said. “The National Restaurant Association ought to release them and allow them to respond. ”

Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to talk but is barred by agreement - The Washington Post

Rewind please. Herman Cain just upped and decided one day to "go around bad-mouthing the two complainants"? Really?

So somehow this "news" just "leaked out"? I hope that if this "complainant" truly wants to speak her truth, the National Restaurant Association frees her from her silence. Of course, this freedom will come at a price, and I don't mean the money she'd surely make from selling her story. I mean, her privacy for so long as her Warholian minutes last.

I do hope she comes forward if her truth is factual. If you were harassed, lady, put it out there. But be prepared.
 
Rewind please. Herman Cain just upped and decided one day to "go around bad-mouthing the two complainants"? Really?

So somehow this "news" just "leaked out"? I hope that if this "complainant" truly wants to speak her truth, the National Restaurant Association frees her from her silence. Of course, this freedom will come at a price, and I don't mean the money she'd surely make from selling her story. I mean, her privacy for so long as her Warholian minutes last.

I do hope she comes forward if her truth is factual. If you were harassed, lady, put it out there. But be prepared.

Wow. That post is filled with so many speculative presumptions that the mind boggles. While you're guessing who might have "outted" this guy's potentially risque past, you might take a look at some of his competition... you know, the other candidates who have huge staffs devoted to digging up dirt on the competition. Don't jump feet first into a mudhole unless you've measured its depth first! :mrgreen:
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Great, so like I thought this isn't about getting the best people for the job anymore, it is about getting only the candidates which can never be touched by opposition research for their entire lives. When the future studies the decline and fall of this great nation, remember we had a hand in this crap!

j-mac

Jmac hate to break this to you...but the politico CEO and the reporter who broke the story are not liberals...they are republicans who worked for reagan.
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Interesting theory. But Cain didn't sign a confidentiality agreement -- at least according to him.

As to your question. What argument? I'm not going to be voting for Cain. My post seemed pretty neutral to me. Never gave Clinton/Paula Jones a thought. Although now that you mention it, so far, it is hardly the same. Yet.



Now. I have a question for you. Why do posters never fail to point out, "Your guy did it, too?" I thought this was a debate site; not a nanny-nanny-booboo site. Maybe I'm wrong. ;) Nevertheless, nothing partisan at all in my above post. Nor this one. Both sides of the aisle don't seem to know how to keep Harvey in their pants.

What I am pointing out is not "Your guy did it too", but that some, depending on which party they are in, will condemn one but support the other for doing the same thing. And I was just asking you a question, and you seemed to have answered it to my satisfaction. I believe that you attacked Clinton, and I also believe that you are attacking Cain. Is that so? If so, then I have no beef with you on this point.
 
This is a high tech lynching along the same lines as the Clarence Thomas hearings. Black men can't get to uppity or do well for themselves and be a conservative. Liberals won't have that. There you go.

Was the accusation by Paula Jones against Bill Clinton also a high tech lynching? As far as the "uppity black man" argument, race bait much?
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Jmac hate to break this to you...but the politico CEO and the reporter who broke the story are not liberals...they are republicans who worked for reagan.

NOOOO!! It's the liberal media!! :lol:
 
Re: Lawyer: Cain accuser wants to tell her side of story

Interesting theory. But Cain didn't sign a confidentiality agreement -- at least according to him.

Another example of Cain being deceptive. The women settled with the Restaurant Association, not Cain, so the Restaurant Association is the party that has rights under the confidentiality agreement. I'm sure they would waive it if Cain asked them to. Did Cain say that he asked them to waive confidentiality? No.
 
This is nothing like Clinton. He did all that while in office.

Cain's predicament occurred back in the 1990s when, due to Clinton's actions in office resulted in over zealous lawyers were telling women to sue for anything and everything.

Cain's issue has already been settled. Long ago. It has no baring on the 2012 election or the circumstances this country is facing.

Let's get back to the actual issues this country faces. We elected an idiot who was never vetted like Cain is currently being vetted, so let's not act like this thing really matters. It really doesn't.

We got a choice in 2012. Romney and Obama will not turn this country around. Cain is a threat to the establishment, which is why he is under assault by the same old tired crap.
 
This is nothing like Clinton. He did all that while in office.

Cain's predicament occurred back in the 1990s when, due to Clinton's actions in office resulted in over zealous lawyers were telling women to sue for anything and everything.

Cain's issue has already been settled. Long ago. It has no baring on the 2012 election or the circumstances this country is facing.

Let's get back to the actual issues this country faces. We elected an idiot who was never vetted like Cain is currently being vetted, so let's not act like this thing really matters. It really doesn't.

We got a choice in 2012. Romney and Obama will not turn this country around. Cain is a threat to the establishment, which is why he is under assault by the same old tired crap.

Are you for real? It was Clinton's fault that Cain was accused of sexual harrassment? :2rofll:
 
Was the accusation by Paula Jones against Bill Clinton also a high tech lynching? As far as the "uppity black man" argument, race bait much?

So, you ok with Libbos saying that Herman Cain, "will sit at the back of the bus", and, "is a black man that knows his place"?
 
Are you for real? It was Clinton's fault that Cain was accused of sexual harrassment? :2rofll:

you must not expect the reich wing conservatives, who insist they espouse personal responsibility, to actually expect ole raisin cain to own up to his own responsibilities
 
Are you for real? It was Clinton's fault that Cain was accused of sexual harrassment? :2rofll:

I believe the point is, a presidential nominee can actually rape someone and still get elected.

All Herman Cain did was say, "You're the same height as my wife".
 
you must not expect the reich wing conservatives, who insist they espouse personal responsibility, to actually expect ole raisin cain to own up to his own responsibilities

And those are what, exactly?
 
Back
Top Bottom