of course, if Treasuries weren't available, they would put it all in a giant tower and go swimming in it like Scrooge McDuck.
nope. are you going to show me the money silos in Canada from when that government started to reduce its' expenditures?Or are you going to show me how the government is forcing people to buy debt at gun point?
hint: you don't actually intimidate anyone. you have 'being an asshole' confused with 'being correct'.Hint: It's time for you to flee.
and in the money silos!Want to explain to me how someone freely investing money is taking money out of the economy when that money wouldn't be used as evident by large cash amounts piling up collectively on corporate and individual balance sheets?
that's a good point. the government is far more likely to waste the money in the construction process than the company is to go completely belly up - especially if the United States makes sure that the taxpayers get protected.... oh, wait, that last bit didn't happen, did it?I've pointed this out before and you just run. And spending on things like bridges is hardly the same as a loan guarantee.
I brought up Solyndra because you are always insisting that if we just took money, ran it through government,and then let politicians allocate massive sums trying to pick out the winners in the alternative energies market that somehow that would lead us onward and upward into massive growth.
now watch - you're going to try to correct this by saying the exact same thing, but with positive descriptors. I'm going to point out the failed example of Spain and you are going to insist that Spain doesn't count because of some other outside factor. Because it's always some other outside factor that explains why keynesianism fails to produce the results it predicts. there is always an excuse. the belief remains adamantium-impervious to repeated historical experience.
don't worry OC. I'm sure you make way much more money than the guys who used to pick on you in High School. they're probably convenience-store attendants, still reliving their glory days. and lots of women say it doesn't even matter what size your penis is.Or do you not know what a loan guarantee is?
I find it amusing all you can do now is just snipe. I guess that's the expected outcome when I stripped you of your only argument before you could even make it.
It's a simplification to be sure - but accounting for the entire collection, management, procurement, disbursement, and every single worker's paycheck, benefits, office supplies along the way? before we even start working on things like environmental impact studies? I wouldn't be surprised to find out I missed the mark low.Furthermore, that $5 in expenses (grossly overexaggerated btw)
just like the Bush stimulus checks that saved us from an economic crash did. meanwhile, otherwise that money would have just sat in that ole money silo, being swam in.should actually create more than $5 in eventual activity as the money gets spent over and over again.
oh i get the theory. I just happen to know that due to the fact that it ignores that the money comes from somewhere, that it is bull.Really, I seriously doubt after all your posts you have any idea what a spending multiplier actually is.