whysoserious
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2011
- Messages
- 8,170
- Reaction score
- 3,199
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I find it interesting that you are worried about how GDP is compared between Administrations. I am not worried about GDP numbers but rather than how many jobs are created and how much tax revenue comes into the govt. You are getting down into weeds with this argument so tell me do you really believe that the voters in this country care about how much GDP comes in or how it is calculated? I can answer that, NO, they don't care, they care whether or not they have or can get a job and a growing GDP generates greater demand for jobs. A growing GDP also grows govt. revenue and both matter when you cut spending and increase govt revenue.
What I pointed out in the Obama numbers is that the GDP for 2011 was very low and I should have put in 2010 numbers showing the decline. That is what matters not the actual numbers adjusted for inflation as there was very little inflation.
You don't? Let's see. Are you a Conservative who thinks Obama is terrible, while Bush and Reagan were great presidents (or at least good presidents)? I am guessing you are. So, when you post a giant list of random numbers about Obama as "proof" that he is not a good leader, and I can match those numbers with equally bad or worse numbers from administrations that you support, then I have successfully shown you to be a political hack (which then discredits everything you say).
Get it?