Because you obviously didn’t read or understand YOUR previous post. You stated that ‘this explicitly says why we should’. The article you posted stated ‘there is also a compelling national interest’. What was included in the article that was ‘explicit’? Because of an opinion of compelling interest? Because at some point in our past our illustrious government decided to TAKE OVER a portion of the education system in this country doesn’t mean that we AGREE NOW. Further it may have SEEMED like a good idea then but the statistics do not support the success of said program over 45 years. Does it seem intelligent to continue the experiment?