Again, source please.
Again, source please.
How did that result in stocks falling?Why? Because three planes flew into three buildings...
Exactly, it redistributes it so that consumers have enough money to be consumers vs the redistribution over the last 30 years from the middle class to the rich, which has only resulted in higher debt and a lower standard of living for the middle classNo, employing more and paying them by taken from others does not increase revenue but merely redistributes it.
The tax revenues taken in by the government.What is the definition of the 'revenue' that you speak of?
All the infrastructure and services the rich utilize to create wealth.What product does the government produce that is valuble to the market?
Just as outlined in the American Jobs Act, by eliminating the tax breaks for the wealthy. It does not increase our debt by a penny.The question still remains...how would you pay for this increase in public employees? We are already overspending.
Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children. ~ Ancient American Indian Proverb
you'll find them in this post (Opposition to Obama grows - strongly). And unlike Conservative's, you'll find them exactly where I linked them. No hunting. No deception. Right there.
Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Click on private sector jobs and the go to the bottom and click on retrieve data. get your wife to help you if you cannot figure it out. My 11 year old granddaughter figured it out so I am sure that one of America's finest can do it as well.
I make the observation that the spike in job loss coincides with the election of the Marxist president. Are you disputing that the first really large increase (over 700,000 jobs lost) occurred in the month he was elected?
Last edited by Misterveritis; 10-24-11 at 09:53 PM.
There you go. Now you can see what happened. Economies are not exactly nimble enough to turn around on a dime unfortunately so your asinine statement that all that huge slide of Bush's loss of jobs should have all the sudden been fixed on January 20, 2009 is absurd at best. BTW Mr. Blame Obama... that january spike... 20 days of it was Bush, 11 days of it was Obama. LOL!!!