• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran accused over Washington terror plot

Mr. Invisible said:
You still believe that Bush had WMD evidence?
Click to expand...

Still beating that dead horse I see.

Bill Clinton said yes, Sadam had WMDs and would use them. I'm guessing you believed it when he said it, didn't you?


 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1059876527 said:
Still beating that dead horse I see.

Bill Clinton said yes, Sadam had WMDs and would use them. I'm guessing you believed it when he said it, didn't you?


Click to expand...


Actually no because guess what? I am only 19 years old. So when Clinton was President, I was in between the ages of 1 and 9.

EDIT: Also Clinton is not the subject of this discussion, rather it is Bush and Bush's (false) claim that Iraq had WMDs, was connected to AQ, and was connected to 9/11.

 
Last edited:
Grant said:
Well you're an adult now, or should be, and thus entitled to the truth. Can you handle it?

Democrats Hypocrisy Over The Iraq War - YouTube
Click to expand...

You do kow this is dishonest, right? Not surprising you'd find this on Hannity. Snoopes shows that while these things were said, Hannity and others who use this neglect time and context. Such dishonesty should not be accepted.
 
apdst said:
You still think Bush faked the WMD evidence?
Click to expand...

Faked evidence? More lied. He had no real evidence, and used things that were doubted, seriously doubted, which where I come from is a lie.
 
Grant said:
Well you're an adult now, or should be, and thus entitled to the truth. Can you handle it?

Democrats Hypocrisy Over The Iraq War - YouTube
Click to expand...

I love how you are continue to avoid the subject at hand which is the fact that there were no WMDs in Iraq and that Saddam had no links to AQ or 9/11 in any way. That the Bush administration lied about all of this in order to invade Iraq.
 
Mr. Invisible said:
Actually no because guess what? I am only 19 years old. So when Clinton was President, I was in between the ages of 1 and 9.
EDIT: Also Clinton is not the subject of this discussion, rather it is Bush and Bush's (false) claim that Iraq had WMDs, was connected to AQ, and was connected to 9/11.
Click to expand...
Grant said:
Well you're an adult now, or should be, and thus entitled to the truth. Can you handle it?
Click to expand...
You're also old enough to know that according to our best estimates available at the time, Iraq was unlikely to attack us directly or by proxy.
 
Boo Radley said:
You do kow this is dishonest, right? Not surprising you'd find this on Hannity. Snoopes shows that while these things were said, Hannity and others who use this neglect time and context. Such dishonesty should not be accepted.
Click to expand...

Well here's your opportunity to supply the time and context.

Why don't you do that and explain what they really meant in those clips?
 
Simon W. Moon said:
You're also old enough to know that according to our best estimates available at the time, Iraq was unlikely to attack us directly or by proxy.
Click to expand...

You mean Iraq was unlikely to attack the United States?

Brilliant!
 
Boo Radley said:
Faked evidence? More lied. He had no real evidence, and used things that were doubted, seriously doubted, which where I come from is a lie.
Click to expand...

He had indications, just like Clinton did. And who seriously doubted them?
 
EagleAye said:
Wow. According to the rightwingnews.com article Ted Kennedy and John Kerry (and many others) supported an Iraq invasion because of WMDs. I wonder what the rebuttal to that is.
Click to expand...

How simple must they be to be fooled by Bush....?

Then again, Bush did have a higher GPA than Kerry...
 
Last edited:
EagleAye said:
Wow. According to the rightwingnews.com article Ted Kennedy and John Kerry (and many others) supported an Iraq invasion because of WMDs. I wonder what the rebuttal to that is.
Click to expand...

Why not ask the OWS crowd? They seem to have a lot of the answers.
 
EagleAye said:
Wow. According to the rightwingnews.com article Ted Kennedy and John Kerry (and many others) supported an Iraq invasion because of WMDs. I wonder what the rebuttal to that is.
Click to expand...

I can make it easy for you...
They're not the ones who cherry picked the intel that suited them.
 
Grant said:
You mean Iraq was unlikely to attack the United States?

Brilliant!
Click to expand...

And they never did. The US was attacked by a group not affiliated with any state or country.
 
KevinKohler said:
And they never did. The US was attacked by a group not affiliated with any state or country.
Click to expand...

You mean on 9/11?

Which attack on US soil, or property, are you referring to?

The affiliation with attacks on America in the last few decades have been from Islamic Jihadists. Their influence is international and they've more support from some countries than others, clandestine though that support might be.
 
ludahai said:
Care to back that up?? Also, you DO know I hope that the bin Laden family had disowned Osama and the Saudi government revoked his passport in the 1990s...
Click to expand...

Of course, he was "disowned", this would shake the connection he had with his family and by proxy, american interests, so that he could "recruit" people to "fight american interests", meanwhile, from the 80's onward it's historical fact that bin laden had been working through the CIA, using the pakistani ISI as a proxy.


apdst said:
I have a better idea, post evidence that UBL was connected to the CIA.
Click to expand...
Osama bin Laden
Here's a little homework for you, and don't forget to read through all the sources as well.

Both of you.

Now, back to the topic :

Remember : This terror plot ahs the same validity as Iraqi yellow cakes.
 
MKULTRABOY said:
You're saying they performed their own intelligence probes into Iraqi WMDs?
Click to expand...

Shouldn't they have? I mean, if you're going to vote for an invasion, shouldn't you be sure you have all the available info?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom