• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House feeds off protest anger

The Tea Party itself claims that they started in 2009. After Bush left office. So yeah, they had a lot of problems with the Bush administration...so many that they waited for him to leave office before they really started up.

While not an official thing, it was the same people who were demanding that we do not pass TARP. They are why it was initially at least voted down.
 
February of 2009. Pretty much right after Obama took power. To protest out of control spending that had been going on for 30 years and they suddenly realized it when a Democrat was in power. How gullible are you think it's not the Republicans somehow?

Obama took it to new levels. $1.5T deficit. The waste of Stimulus. The crap of Obamacare, with such as the Cornhusker Kickback, Florida Flim-flam, and Louisiana Purchase. Call it the logs that broke the camel's back.
 
This is a completely side arguement as IMO even if the Wall Street thing has any impact it's not comparable to what happened in France but IMO France ended up better off.

What happened would have anyway most likely in a far more rational manner like with England today but the complaints were legit.

I think that's the part you're missing: the complaints during the French Revolution weren't legitimate. They were grievances based on rumors. i.e. Marie Antionette never said, "let them eat cake".

The rumors of crimes committed by the Aristocrats were started for no other reason than to stir up public anger.

The 600,000 people who were executed in France were some of France's best and brightest and looking at the events that followed the revolution and at modern day France, I would hardly say that they are better off.

The coincidence between the French Revolution and the occupiers is that they're both motivated by bull**** information and are aggetated by people who don't really have the best interest of the country in mind.
 
Last edited:
The Tea Party itself claims that they started in 2009. After Bush left office. So yeah, they had a lot of problems with the Bush administration...so many that they waited for him to leave office before they really started up.

It's because Obama is black in 3...2...1...
 
I think that's the part you're missing: the complaints during the French Revolution weren't legitimate. They were grievances based on rumors. i.e. Marie Antionette never said, "let them eat cake".

The rumors of crimes committed by the Aristocrats were started for no other reason than to stir up public anger.

The 600,000 people who were executed in France were some of France's best and brightest and looking at the events that followed the revolution and at modern day France, I would hardly say that they are better off.

The coincidence between the French Revolution and the occupiers is that they're both motivated by bull**** information and are aggetated by people who don't really have the best interest of the country in mind.

I would agree. France was one giant disaster after the French Revolution. If anything, it paved the way for Napoleon's rise to power, not unlike how Hitler came to power with the disaster that was Germany after WWI. France's government has pretty much been a joke since.
 
Last edited:
I owuld agree. France was one giant disaster after the French Revolution. If anything, it paved the way for Napoleon's rise to power, not unlike how Hitler came to power with the disaster that was Germany after WWI. France's government has pretty much been a joke since.

Yes, the French Revolution definitely opened the door for Napolean to rise to power. Anyone with the guts and brains to stop him were dead.
 
I think that's the part you're missing: the complaints during the French Revolution weren't legitimate. They were grievances based on rumors. i.e. Marie Antionette never said, "let them eat cake".

I undertand that and that's simply something added to make the story more interesting after the fact.

The rumors of crimes committed by the Aristocrats were started for no other reason than to stir up public anger.

The 600,000 people who were executed in France were some of France's best and brightest and looking at the events that followed the revolution and at modern day France, I would hardly say that they are better off.

The coincidence between the French Revolution and the occupiers is that they're both motivated by bull**** information and are aggetated by people who don't really have the best interest of the country in mind.

I'm not a big fan of Aristocracy and those who feel they are superior simply because of birth.
 
I find this incredible because I believe the protesters are feeding off of Obama's Class War statements the put the rich in the cross hairs, along with any successful business.

These idiots don't seem to know where jobs come from. They seem to buy Obama's stupid damn idea that Government is the answer and redistribution of wealth is a good thing.

Only damn fools think that socialism/communism can work here, because it has never has and never will.
When you level the playing field everyone ends up poor and jobs go away.'

Obama is continuing to feed the unruly, unwashed, uninformed with his comments, along with Nasty Piglousy, and other imbecilic fools.

You mean that the Republican party hasn't been feeding off the Tea Party movement?

Oh.
 
I find this incredible because I believe the protesters are feeding off of Obama's Class War statements the put the rich in the cross hairs, along with any successful business.

These idiots don't seem to know where jobs come from. They seem to buy Obama's stupid damn idea that Government is the answer and redistribution of wealth is a good thing.

Only damn fools think that socialism/communism can work here, because it has never has and never will.
When you level the playing field everyone ends up poor and jobs go away.'

Obama is continuing to feed the unruly, unwashed, uninformed with his comments, along with Nasty Piglousy, and other imbecilic fools.

Obama is trying to figure out a way to ingratiate himself to these morons. It won't be hard to do since 1, they are morons, 2 they basically think alike. Obama is one of them and if he wasn't pres he would be there protesting.
 
Obama is trying to figure out a way to ingratiate himself to these morons. It won't be hard to do since 1, they are morons, 2 they basically think alike. Obama is one of them and if he wasn't pres he would be there protesting.

Figure out a way ? Won't be hard, as these folks were bought, paid for, and sent by Obama's reelection campaign. They were puppets on strings before they ever showed up. Its also why they haven't a clue why they are there. It was not explained to them.
 
Right -- because if you disagree with them that means they're puppets, not young and angry and passionate enough to put their feelings on display.
 
Last edited:
Figure out a way ? Won't be hard, as these folks were bought, paid for, and sent by Obama's reelection campaign. They were puppets on strings before they ever showed up. Its also why they haven't a clue why they are there. It was not explained to them.

I’ve thought that myself and then I think no, I can’t believe anything this diabolical is happening. I could be wrong.
 
Figure out a way ? Won't be hard, as these folks were bought, paid for, and sent by Obama's reelection campaign. They were puppets on strings before they ever showed up. Its also why they haven't a clue why they are there. It was not explained to them.

And I'm gonna bet you believe the Tea Party found all the money they've enjoyed under a cabbage leaf.

Or that Jesus gave it to them.

Or they painted those buses with their industrious little hands (with the help of elves.

Your guys will have new propaganda tomorrow.

Wait til then, you're just recycling the same memes in different threads.

It makes you look desperate.

They might even have some footage of Wall St. occupiers eating good christian babies. (With palm trees in the background, of course)
 
Link to this money.

Well, a google search of "tea party funding" yields a bunch of results.

None are from Fox, or the Heritage Foundation.

I'm not sure where you're going with this.

From your other posts in these threads I'm going to assume you're withholding judgement.

So I would humbly suggest you perform the same search and see if you find any of the sources credible.

Or point me to what you know that I don't.
 
Well, a google search of "tea party funding" yields a bunch of results.

None are from Fox, or the Heritage Foundation.

I'm not sure where you're going with this.

From your other posts in these threads I'm going to assume you're withholding judgement.

So I would humbly suggest you perform the same search and see if you find any of the sources credible.

Or point me to what you know that I don't.

I can not prove or disprove all of this money if there isn't any. You made the accusations. It seems that you base them on highly partisan websites that you know won't work as proof of anything.

I never accused the Wall Street thing of being bankrolled other than perhaps by the parents of those there because I have no proof.
 
And I'm gonna bet you believe the Tea Party found all the money they've enjoyed under a cabbage leaf.

Or that Jesus gave it to them.

Or they painted those buses with their industrious little hands (with the help of elves.

Your guys will have new propaganda tomorrow.

Wait til then, you're just recycling the same memes in different threads.

It makes you look desperate.

They might even have some footage of Wall St. occupiers eating good christian babies. (With palm trees in the background, of course)

Let me 'splain dis fo yu. There is no doubt that with all the "grass roots" movements of any consequence, a political party will try to co-opt them, or at least gain more than they lose, and not be pushed aside. Provide some funds etc. None of that is new, much less not to be expected.

It is also not the issue here. As has been explained and addressed considerably in discussions here, the Tea Party foundation first appeared while Bush was President, feeling he had drifted too far from Conservative principles. It was timely, and found critical mass soon therafter with Obama and Obamacare and Stimulus. Both programs unique in our political history, btw, and easy lightening rods for smaller government Constitutionalist folks.

But then we get OWS. Protesting events from .... when ? While the Tea Party had a clear path to a common goal of opposing the actions of government at the time, to include primarying RINO's, we do not have any grass-roots signature for OWS. And they sure as crap will not be primarying Democrats.

What we do have is the beginning of the reelection campaign for President Zero. who has literally nothing from his first 4 years (we can extrapolate one more year of failure with ease here) to run on. So his campaign foments the largest rent-a-mob incidence of civil unrest and disobedience in history. And they will break stuff before they let go of their dream of an eternal government teat, which they thought Obama would make happen.

I'm not desperate my friend. But all the libs are. Gonna be quite a show.
 
Last edited:
I can not prove or disprove all of this money if there isn't any. You made the accusations. It seems that you base them on highly partisan websites that you know won't work as proof of anything.

I never accused the Wall Street thing of being bankrolled other than perhaps by the parents of those there because I have no proof.

Sorry about the Fox line. It wasn't supposed to sound like it did on rereading.

The Tea Party certainly has been well funded and orchestrated. The buses alone cost a pretty penny.

Those purported to be funding them don't want folks to know.

But it seems if they were member funded, amidst all the furor over the involvement of armitage and the Kochs, it would have been a simple matter to prove this. Which I have heard nothing of.

So I really don't know what to tell you.

P.S. the NYT, New Yorker, the Guardian and other major newspapers were all represented on the first google page. Are any of those good enough?
 
Last edited:
Let me 'splain dis fo yu. There is no doubt that with all the "grass roots" movements of any consequence, a political party will try to co-opt them, or at least gain more than they lose, and not be pushed aside. Provide some funds etc. None of that is new, much less not to be expected.

It is also not the issue here. As has been explained and addressed considerably in discussions here, the Tea Party foundation first appeared while Bush was President, feeling he had drifted too far from Conservative principles. It was timely, and found critical mass soon therafter with Obama and Obamacare and Stimulus. Both programs unique in our political history, btw, and easy lightening rods for smaller government Constitutionalist folks.

But then we get OWS. Protesting events from .... when ? While the Tea Party had a clear path to a common goal of opposing the actions of government at the time, to include primarying RINO's, we do not have any grass-roots signature for OWS. And they sure as crap will not be primarying Democrats.

What we do have is the beginning of the reelection campaign for President Zero. who has literally nothing from his first 4 years (we can extrapolate one more year of failure with ease here) to run on. So his campaign foments the largest rent-a-mob incidence of civil unrest and disobedience in history. And they will break stuff before they let go of their dream of an eternal government teat, which they thought Obama would make happen.

I'm not desperate my friend. But all the libs are. Gonna be quite a show.

Sorry, but I bet you can't prove any of this.

We'll wait til your boys provide you with tomorrows salvo.
 
Sorry about the Fox line. It wasn't supposed to sound like it did on rereading.

The Tea Party certainly has been well funded and orchestrated.

Link?

The Wall Street protest has been 100% funded by Soros. Fact. Prove it that it hasn't been. :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom