Among othe things, you also have the choice to pay for your health care yourself.
Thus, there are more than the two choices you offered.
The Party of Choice has taken your right to make that choice away from you.
There's actually no way that the supreme court will be touching this any time soon. One of the prerequisites that a case must meet before being granted certiorari is actual harm. No one can claim to have been harmed by a provision that is not yet in effect.
Liberté. Égalité. Fraternité.
The states are taking the case to the Court. Their argument is that the law, by virtue of its very existence, violates their rights under the 10th.
Aside from that, so long as 4 justices agree that specific of the petition, whatever they are, warrant a review, cert can be granted..
Since when has Democrats been the party of "choice". Saying a woman has the right to choose what she does with her body or who someone wants to marry is different than saying someone has the right to forgo insurance premiums because if they go to the hospital then everyone else covers it.Certainly.
The point you're trying to not address is that The Party of Choice has taken the right to make that choice away from them.
Why do you not want to address that?
I personally would prefer a Single Payer system which the rest of the world uses and has much lower medical costs. Instead, conservative prefer our currenct system where costs rise much higher than wage growth and is bankrupting the country. Your choice is sticking your fingers in your ears and pretending that there's nothing wrong that we don't have to change anything.