• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Serve Time In Jail...Or In Church?

This can't be a serious question, or you just have no idea who these people are.

Liberal Republicans have Liberal social values but Conservative fiscal values.

So, what liberal social values do the Westboro folks have? are they pro choice? pro environment? anti-gun control? pro- affirmative action? against the death penalty?
 
Liberal Republicans have Liberal social values but Conservative fiscal values.

So, what liberal social values do the Westboro folks have? are they pro choice? pro environment? anti-gun control? pro- affirmative action? against the death penalty?

You're still confusing liberal with democrat/left.
 
what Liberal social views do the WBC folks have?

you've been asked three times now.

Liberal-right views like welcoming the death of gays? You aren't being serious at all. Priestsrapeboys.com?
 
Last edited:
never mind, jerry. i don't care anymore.

Your grammar indicates you didn't care in the first place, and obscurity of your questions would further support this as well.
 
that is a liberal social view?

Yes.

on what planet?

Earth. You should come visit sometime. It's quite lovely here.

Liberal Republicans are socially Liberal and fiscally Conservative.

WBC and Army of God prove that your position may not be as informed or accuret as you assumed. New information ftw.


***
As I said before all the inane, vauge questions began, there is a difference between the liberal right and the liberal left.

A good example is the separation of Church and State. The liberal right wants a theocracy while the liberal left wants every public facade sterilized of religious reference.

On abortion, the liberal right wants no abortion at all for any reason, while the liberal left wants easy access to abortion by 12 y/o'ds without their parent's knowledge or consent, and of course at tax-payer expense.

Each side radically opposing the other, sometimes with explosives, and always ****ing up the world for the rest of us.
 
Last edited:
....As I said before all the inane, vauge questions began, there is a difference between the liberal right and the liberal left.

A good example is the separation of Church and State. The liberal right wants a theocracy while the liberal left wants every public facade sterilized of religious reference.

On abortion, the liberal right wants no abortion at all for any reason, while the liberal left wants easy access to abortion by 12 y/o'ds without their parent's knowledge or consent, and of course at tax-payer expense.

Each side radically opposing the other, sometimes with explosives, and always ****ing up the world for the rest of us.

Wanna bet what would happen if you called them "Liberals"?

Pro-Life is not a Liberal view. Supporting a theocracy is not a Liberal view. You are either just playing silly TGIF games, or have no clue what American Liberalism is.
 
Wanna bet what would happen if you called them "Liberals"?

Pro-Life is not a Liberal view. Supporting a theocracy is not a Liberal view. You are either just playing silly TGIF games, or have no clue what American Liberalism is.

Being pro-life is not a liberal view.

Thinking that bombing an abortion clinic is ok is a liberal view.

****

Being pro-choice is not a liberal view.

Thinking that secretly getting a 12 y/o an abortion w/o her parent's knowledge or consent is a liberal view.


****
Most of the time Moderates and Conservatives can at least agree on enough mutual ground to keep the planet spinning. Liberals, however, are fighting on whether to spin the planet off into space or slam-dunk it into the sun.
 
..Thinking that bombing an abortion clinic is ok is a liberal view.

..Being pro-choice is not a liberal view....

ok, I see that you are just playing games and have no intention of taking this debate seriously. We are done.
 
ok, I see that you are just playing games and have no intention of taking this debate seriously. We are done.

That's called putting the shoe on the other foot.
 
That's called putting the shoe on the other foot.


No it's called trolling. And the right does it quite a bit here. There is no such thing as what Jerry is describing being attributed to liberals.

Kinda like how conservatives don't know how to use socialist and Marxist correctly.

I do however like the fact that Jerry adds the word "right" to the extremes as violent. It's irony that I'm sure is lost on him. :lol:
 
Being pro-life is not a liberal view.

Thinking that bombing an abortion clinic is ok is a liberal view.

****

Being pro-choice is not a liberal view.

Thinking that secretly getting a 12 y/o an abortion w/o her parent's knowledge or consent is a liberal view.


****
Most of the time Moderates and Conservatives can at least agree on enough mutual ground to keep the planet spinning. Liberals, however, are fighting on whether to spin the planet off into space or slam-dunk it into the sun.
Here pal, thank me later ...

Dictionary.com | Find the Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com
 
No it's called trolling. And the right does it quite a bit here. There is no such thing as what Jerry is describing being attributed to liberals.

It's done often by those of all beliefs. Actually, by trying to paint this as something one side does, in a way you are doing the very same thing.
 
It's done often by those of all beliefs. Actually, by trying to paint this as something one side does, in a way you are doing the very same thing.

Conservatives don't do these things, though.

Conservative Right and Conservative Left can easily compromise on abortion, for example. The finished product being responsible yet unlimited use pre-viability, with reasonable restrictions to protect both the mother's health and the potential life inside her post-viability.

***
Liberal Right want's marriage to be damn-near if not exclusively religious, with of course all the legal benefits. Meanwhile, Liberal Left would like to completely dissolve marriage in every way if they can't get whatever token minority group they're pandering for the votes of, access to 'marriage'.

Conservatives, however, pretty much agree that variety is fine so long as the emphasis of marriage remains the raising and socializing of children. Other than that, alternative couplings are tolerable even if personal religious preferences differ.

***
Conservatives of every party, even Conservative Loosertarians, tend to get along with each-other quite well. A Liberal Looserterian wants all drugs legalized across the board, even-through this means no one would ever again need a prescription. Liberal Right want to keep beating their heads against the wall with the failed "war on drugs" and put you in prison for 12 years if you have so much as 1 pot seed.

Conservative Right and Conservative Loosertarians have common ground in legalizing recreational drugs like pot, while placing more emphasis on rehabilitation over prison time for users of hard drugs like meth.

***
Conservatives play nice with other Conservatives, but liberals fight to the death with Liberals of other tribe-er, I mean parties.
 
Last edited:
No it's called trolling. And the right does it quite a bit here.
Only because your liberal do you say the right does it quite a bit. I on the other hand see just as much or more from liberal posters.

There is no such thing as what Jerry is describing being attributed to liberals.
Says you... perhaps to someone else, there may be such a thing.

Kinda like how conservatives don't know how to use socialist and Marxist correctly.
Well that's the claim anyway... I more or less see those "you're not using the term correctly" as BS because there's still a stigma associated with both socialism and Marxisim and liberals want to stay as far away from it as possible - hence the constant criticism. Don't get me wrong, it's a very valid and good tactic which has been successful for quite many years - so much so that one could almost say people have been brain washed into believing it to the extent that, such defense is little needed. Just like people think Christopher Columbus discovered America.

I do however like the fact that Jerry adds the word "right" to the extremes as violent. It's irony that I'm sure is lost on him. :lol:
Everyone's group has their violent parts --- it's part of the human condition. Liberals have them too. Funny you didn't mention that.
 
Why would I thank you for a link to an inaccurate and discredited dictionary?

Webster ftw. You're welcome.
"Inaccurate and discredited??"

:lamo :lamo :lamo

You're funny.

Still, you're in desperate need of a dictionary. Use any one of your choosing.
 
Last edited:
"Inaccurate and discredited??"

:lamo :lamo :lamo

You're funny.

Still, you're in desperate need of a dictionary. Use any one of your choosing.

It's a lack of experience which leads you to assume my posts are born from a lack of accuret information. You're assuming I desire objective and substantive debate 24/7/365+1.

Those who desire real discussions go to the loft, or ask for a True Debate thread.

This is not The Loft.

[video=youtube;efHCdKb5UWc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=efHCdKb5UWc[/video]

I desire spirited discussions; the old, original definition of "flame" before it was reduced to mean 'insulting'. Threads which resemble Comedy Central's Roast interest me the most.
 
Last edited:
Why aren't they apart of the discussion? Last time I checked, "Marijuana churches" aren't a part of the discussion either. I know enough of them.

You asked me for an example and I gave you one. Then you brought up all these unnecessary people. If you don't want an answer, don't ask the question.
 
You asked me for an example and I gave you one. Then you brought up all these unnecessary people. If you don't want an answer, don't ask the question.

How are those people "unnecessary" and why do you consider "those" gods 'unusual'?
 
It's a lack of experience which leads you to assume my posts are born from a lack of accuret information. You're assuming I desire objective and substantive debate 24/7/365+1.

Those who desire real discussions go to the loft, or ask for a True Debate thread.

This is not The Loft.

[video=youtube;efHCdKb5UWc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=efHCdKb5UWc[/video]

I desire spirited discussions; the old, original definition of "flame" before it was reduced to mean 'insulting'. Threads which resemble Comedy Central's Roast interest me the most.
Since you confess you're a troll, there is no reason to continue posting to you.

Ciao.
 
Since you confess you're a troll, there is no reason to continue posting to you.

Ciao.

The secret is not that I'm a troll.

The secret is everyone on this forum is a troll. Everyone baits. Everyone plays little games to trip up their opponent. Everyone. Even you.
 
Back
Top Bottom