- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 93,945
- Reaction score
- 69,027
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Got it! You would rather vote for someone who cannot possibly win and who will have no impact on the resulting Administration rather than voting for someone, who could.
You are correct. I am done voting for the lesser of two evils. Each election cycle we've ended up with someone worse because we vote lesser of two evils. Maybe we don't end up with the most incompetent, but it's a downward spiral. It's pointless and it's risking the very future of the Republic. My vote, my choice. Deal with it.
I'm glad I don't have to explain why I, in effect, sat on the sidelines and allowed that to happen. I guess we all have our crosses to bear.
I voted my conscious, for the person I felt was best qualified for the job. Sorry if I discriminate along performance lines. If you want me to support your side, you're just going to have to put up a quality candidate. Till that time, I'm not going to vote for your guy. Someone else may get in, but that's not my fault either. I didn't vote for them. I vote for the one who I feel can do the best job and who will best proliferate the Republic. That has been as of late not the Republocrats. The Republocrats are the party of the status quo, and the status quo currently is broken.
You will not change the status quo by supporting the status quo. To think so is silly.
Last edited: