• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sources: Obama Administration to Drop Troop Levels in Iraq to 3,000

TheDemSocialist said:
Man your the one claiming that Iran is about to invade Iraq or some nonsense like that. I would say that i have no evidence that they will is pretty good evidence that they are not going to invade Iraq......

And by the way i was the one to ask a question first in response when you said:"BTW, nevermind that Iran has been supporting insurgents in Iraq for years, now. Just a coincidence, I'm sure." In response i asked: "Does that point out that they are going to launch an invasion on Iraq????" Then you said: "Do you have a single shred of evidence that proves that an invasion by Iran is an impossibility?" You never answered that question so you in fact are being a hypocrite here.

And the only "evidence" you have is an "age old axiom"? Seriously? Thats some **** evidence man... Try to hold that one up...


Click to expand...

I never said that. Where do you get that from?

"you wrong...you wrong...you wrong", isn't an argument, brother.
 
Last edited:
Good. The only troops that need to remain in Iraq are the ones needed to protect the green zone. My understanding is that the Iraqi army is strong, Iraqis and their government want the troops out, and the US public hasn't wanted them since at least 2007.
 
xpiher said:
Good. The only troops that need to remain in Iraq are the ones needed to protect the green zone. My understanding is that the Iraqi army is strong, Iraqis and their government want the troops out, and the US public hasn't wanted them since at least 2007.
Click to expand...

Commanders on the ground say that 3,000 troops aren't enough to do the job. But, what do they know, right?
 
apdst said:
I've posted a ****load more than you, bro! :lamo
Click to expand...

You've posted exactly zero evidence, so that would be a big fail. :2rofll:
 
MrVicchio said:
I think Obama's in full on panic mode now. He's completely out of control.
Click to expand...

Exactly what the agreement between the US and Iraq stipulates. Is this the first you have heard of the SOFA?

And I thought you thought the US was spending too much money? Have a change of heart on spending?
 
AdamT said:
You've posted exactly zero evidence, so that would be a big fail. :2rofll:
Click to expand...

Right! Because you say so, yes?

This from a buncha boys that don't even know what air supremacy means.

Probably believe in global warming and that Dick Cheney outted Valerie Plame, too. :lamo
 
apdst said:
Right! Because you say so, yes?

This from a buncha boys that don't even know what air supremacy means.

Probably believe in global warming and that Dick Cheney outted Valerie Plame, too. :lamo
Click to expand...

Yeah, I believe in all that crazy science talk. Loony, right? :2rofll:
 
Cold Highway said:
In reality the left loves the warfare state as much as you do.
Click to expand...

Go look up the congressional vote on Iraq, the majority of Democrats voted against the war.
 
ric27 said:
Iraq's shiites have a choice to make: be an ally of the US or be an ally with Iran and when the country breaks up (as it will, at some point), that choice will mean quite alot.

An Iraqi shiite unification with Iranian shiites is not far off
Click to expand...

The GOP should have considered that before voting to remove the one person preventing that from happening.
 
Jetboogieman said:
Wanna post any evidence at all?

You haven't.
Click to expand...

Really goes against the grain of what you are used to seeing....thus a combination of things will come into play. Little things will add up....slowly, but surely.

Iran has a population almost 3 times that of Iraq and their military hasn't been debilitated by a war and 10+ years of sanctions

Iran is correct in their assessment that, we don't have the manpower or the national willpower to fight a long, protracted war against Iran.

China stated a long time ago that they were planning on a war with the US.

Russia and China already sell weapons to Iran and give them technology. Russia and China will support Iran because it hurts us and anything that reduces our strength, economically and militarily, and our influence, creates a vacuum that they can move in on

China is using a lot more oil then they used to. Making friends with a major oil supplier is a good move for them, especially when it cramps our influence in a major strategic area and right now they are sucking in huge bucks selling us stuff and making our economy dependent on their industry.
 
ric27 said:
Really goes against the grain of what you are used to seeing....thus a combination of things will come into play. Little things will add up....slowly, but surely.

Iran has a population almost 3 times that of Iraq and their military hasn't been debilitated by a war and 10+ years of sanctions

Iran is correct in their assessment that, we don't have the manpower or the national willpower to fight a long, protracted war against Iran.

China stated a long time ago that they were planning on a war with the US.

Russia and China already sell weapons to Iran and give them technology. Russia and China will support Iran because it hurts us and anything that reduces our strength, economically and militarily, and our influence, creates a vacuum that they can move in on

China is using a lot more oil then they used to. Making friends with a major oil supplier is a good move for them, especially when it cramps our influence in a major strategic area and right now they are sucking in huge bucks selling us stuff and making our economy dependent on their industry.
Click to expand...

Oh for ****s sake.

Seriously the China thing again?

I'm sorry if you can't get the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction through your ****ing skull then don't bother.
 
AdamT said:
Yeah, I believe in all that crazy science talk. Loony, right? :2rofll:
Click to expand...

The faked science, you mean, sir?

yes, believing in cooked reports, would be loony, sir. Loony, indeed.
 
apdst said:
The faked science, you mean, sir?

yes, believing in cooked reports, would be loony, sir. Loony, indeed.
Click to expand...

Right, I forgot. All that science is faked. :lol:
 
Jetboogieman said:
Oh for ****s sake.

Seriously the China thing again?

I'm sorry if you can't get the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction through your ****ing skull then don't bother.
Click to expand...

Civilizations tend to rise and fall about every 400 years. Columbus arrived here in 1492, so we're about due. Columbus is mentioned, which is interesting considering where Spain ended up 500 years later: ....Geopolitically irrelevant.

Historically speaking, America has had its shot. China knows this and are well aware of the grave internal issues America faces.

Truth hurts
 
apdst said:
Sure is. Haven't you heard about those falsified reports?
Click to expand...

I'm sure you mean the ones that have been found not to have been falsified by multiple bodies of investigators, but that dimwits still think were falsified?
 
ric27 said:
Civilizations tend to rise and fall about every 400 years. Columbus arrived here in 1492, so we're about due. Columbus is mentioned, which is interesting considering where Spain ended up 500 years later: ....Geopolitically irrelevant.
Click to expand...

I kick the clock off at 1776, which gives us at the very least another 150 years of world dominance. This is good enough for me.
 
apdst said:
I never said that. Where do you get that from?
Click to expand...
Uhhh you certainly have been the one implying that Iran has intentions to invade Iraq...

"you wrong...you wrong...you wrong", isn't an argument, brother.
Click to expand...
Ive never said "your wrong your wrong your wrong" or whatever. Ive just been asking for evidence or sources or proof that Iran has..... All am asking, and still waiting.
 
AdamT said:
Right, I forgot. All that science is faked. :lol:
Click to expand...

Yep science is fake. Cells are fake, nuclear bombs are fake, hell this computer that uses computer science is fake.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Uhhh you certainly have been the one implying that Iran has intentions to invade Iraq...


Ive never said "your wrong your wrong your wrong" or whatever. Ive just been asking for evidence or sources or proof that Iran has..... All am asking, and still waiting.
Click to expand...

I only said that it was a possibility and provided evidence to support that possibility. You claim it's an impossibility and provided crap.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Yep science is fake. Cells are fake, nuclear bombs are fake, hell this computer that uses computer science is fake.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but, no one faked the information make those things come to fuition, as with global warming research. Global warming isn't science, it's mythology.
 
apdst said:
I only said that it was a possibility and provided evidence to support that possibility.
Click to expand...
Your evidence was that some insurgents were trained in Iran? Thats pretty damn weak evidence that the nation of Iran is going to invade Iraq once we leave....... I wouldnt even call that evidence.

You claim it's an impossibility and provided crap.
Click to expand...
I never said it was "impossible" ive never claimed anything i just asked for evidence that the nation of Iran has plans to invade Iraq.....
I havent provided anything because there is no evidence to provide when a nation has no plans to invade another nation. Its like someone saying hey the nation of France has plans to invade the nation of Spain (which they dont) and my job is to try to refute that claim so where do i pull up something that says "No the nation of France has no plans ot invade Spain"? Because its not a logical idea or prediction or anywhere in the future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom