Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.
Alexis de Tocqueville
You have to prove your claim is correct. Simply pointing to a lack of disproof does not mean you are right.See, without evidence, my point will be correct... and as you've no doubt already Googled it... you'll see that Gibson has been the only guitar company in the past 4 years, singled out twice for raids.
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
You claimed that Gibson was singled out. That's not a negative. Now prove your deluded claim
You've also claimed that Gibsons' 6th Amend rights were violated. That's not a negative either. Now prove your deluded claim
This is the 2nd time in one day that you have forgotten your own words. Given their absurdity, I can't blame youIncorrect - I am making a claim the 6th amendment may have been violated. I also find the 4 years as being excessive and unreasonable.
What we know is that the government has raided only Gibson, confiscated their assets, but has yet to charge them after four years.
Now, you can make assumptions off that, as you have, but clearly there are other explanations. I would suggest that our government made a token effort to pacify some other party, either such as India, or the tree-hugging voter block, or both. It did not need to raid anyone else as there is a huge diminishing political return after the first such action. Further, as it has not brought charges, it is fully aware of the difficulty in supporting this over-reach.
you want to believe there are other lacey act violators
but you have no basis to make such a statement
'which causes you to wrongly insist that gibson has been singled out
my bad. it is the sixth amendmentIncorrect - I am making a claim the 6th amendment may have been violated. I also find the 4 years as being excessive and unreasonable.
the one that tells us:even tho there have been ZERO arrestsIn all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
somehow, you believe there must be a prosecution prior to arrest
a position amazingly devoid of any form of logic