Page 193 of 194 FirstFirst ... 93143183191192193194 LastLast
Results 1,921 to 1,930 of 1936

Thread: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

  1. #1921
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,258

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by donc View Post
    Hhmm...if i go rummaging through all 192 pages of this thread, i will find that the only citations of employment made by you will be from "Total Nonfarm Employment "is that a big ten four?
    Total non farm payroll excludes public sector jobs so what do you want me to include?

  2. #1922
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    11,265

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post

    BLS will not let you post the direct link to the chart, get a good nights sleep, click on the link I gave you and put a checkmark in the employment box and see what it shows you.
    Of course it does ... if you know what you're doing ...


    Total nonfarm


    ... I hope you're taking notes for these lessons, Con. How does it feel to get constantly schooled by a Liberal?

  3. #1923
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    11,265

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post

    No, I blame Obama for the economic results of 2010 and 2011 as it was his economic policy that generated those results. Discouraged workers are his responsibility and the loss in consumer and business confidence is his responsibility. This is the Obama economy and the results are a disaster
    Still waiting for an answer, Con ...

    Why do you claim Obama's results gave us 3 million additionally underemployed since you have to start counting from February 1st, 2009, to reach? Seems to me you are attributing job loses to him that even you don't believe belong to him.

  4. #1924
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,258

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    Of course it does ... if you know what you're doing ...


    Total nonfarm


    ... I hope you're taking notes for these lessons, Con. How does it feel to get constantly schooled by a Liberal?
    Thanks for showing that non farm payroll jobs were down as confirmed by the chart I posted.

  5. #1925
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,258

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    Still waiting for an answer, Con ...

    Why do you claim Obama's results gave us 3 million additionally underemployed since you have to start counting from February 1st, 2009, to reach? Seems to me you are attributing job loses to him that even you don't believe belong to him.
    Obama's results are public record and since he was in the Congress yes, he is responsible for the job losses in February 2009

  6. #1926
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    11,265

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by donc View Post

    Hhmm...if i go rummaging through all 192 pages of this thread, i will find that the only citations of employment made by you will be from "Total Nonfarm Employment "is that a big ten four?
    Umm, no, unfortunately not. You see, Con like to cherry-pick data series' based on the ones he likes the best. Sometimes that is household survey data, sometimes it's payroll data, sometimes it's nominal data, sometimes it's real data. The only consistency you will find in the numbers he posts is that the numbers will constently be the biggest numbers which favor his position.

  7. #1927
    Sage
    AdamT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 04:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    17,773

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Obama's results are public record and since he was in the Congress yes, he is responsible for the job losses in February 2009
    No, Boehner was in Congress so it was HIS fault.

  8. #1928
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,258

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    Umm, no, unfortunately not. You see, Con like to cherry-pick data series' based on the ones he likes the best. Sometimes that is household survey data, sometimes it's payroll data, sometimes it's nominal data, sometimes it's real data. The only consistency you will find in the numbers he posts is that the numbers will constently be the biggest numbers which favor his position.
    Interesting that my chart and yours are the same and both show lower employment numbers today than in either January or February 2009

  9. #1929
    Sage

    Donc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    out yonder
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    Umm, no, unfortunately not. You see, Con like to cherry-pick data series' based on the ones he likes the best. Sometimes that is household survey data, sometimes it's payroll data, sometimes it's nominal data, sometimes it's real data. The only consistency you will find in the numbers he posts is that the numbers will constently be the biggest numbers which favor his position.
    Yeah i know,i have his post in this thread lined up like ducks in a pond.
    The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say

  10. #1930
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,258

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamT View Post
    No, Boehner was in Congress so it was HIS fault.
    It was Congress and the President that affect the economy, not just one. Obama cannot blame someone else for what his majority party helped create

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •