So just tell me what policies that the repubs were in control of the senate for that three month period caused the recession some 8 years later. Otherwise you are just being dishonest, and trolling. And I will start reporting it.The 2001 recession began in March while Republicans controlled the Senate...
I posit the one dispensing crap is the one talking out of both sides of his mouth, saying both that the numbers are lies, but yet factual at the same time.
Last edited by Kushinator; 09-12-11 at 02:15 PM.
It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
"Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911
The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say
Oh wait, you don't even know which party controlled the Senate when the 2001 recession started. What am I thinking asking you for facts?
Last edited by Sheik Yerbuti; 09-12-11 at 02:14 PM.
So, Con? No apology for calling others ignorant for pointing out your mistakes?
pbrauer: "Aren't you the one that claims that Bush inherited a recession from Clinton?"
Conservative: "He did, March 2001 according to NBER so unless you can tell me what Bush implemented on January 21, 2001 with a Democrat Controlled Senate that created a recession that started in March it was an inherited recession?"
Sheik Yerbuti: "WTF?? Are you saying the 2001 recession began while Democrats controlled the Senate? Face reality, Con .... the 2001 recession began while Republicans controlled the Senate, the House, and the executive branch."
Conservative: "Really? So Daschle stole the title of Senate Majority Leader in 2001? Wow, your ignorance has no bounds."