Page 132 of 194 FirstFirst ... 3282122130131132133134142182 ... LastLast
Results 1,311 to 1,320 of 1936

Thread: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

  1. #1311
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,249

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    Strip out the invective, strip out the rhetoric, and all that remains of your post is a link to an unscientific online poll.

    <yawn>
    I know, any poll that shows lack of support for Obama is invalid and unscientific. Are you working shifts preparing Mt. Rushmore for Obama?

  2. #1312
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    11,265

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post

    I know, any poll that shows lack of support for Obama is invalid and unscientific.
    No, Con, a poll that is taken online is unscientific regardless of the results. Looks like we've stumbled upon yet another area you need to bone up on.

  3. #1313
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,249

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    In your boilerplate talking points you mentioned the downgrade, did you not? The debt wasn't the problem, it was the conservatives/Tea Party holding the debt ceiling hostage.
    Of course it was, the T.E.A. Party was created last year and after the democrat controlled Congress increased the debt and failed to even pass a budget while adding trillions to the debt. Only a liberal would claim that adding 4 trillion to the debt in less than 3 years isn't a problem. Just shows how little credibility liberals have today. Democrats controlled Congress for two years and did what? No budget! 800+ billion stimulus that failed, Obamacare job killer, 4 trillion added to the debt but you blame the T.E.A. Party. Typical liberalism
    Last edited by Conservative; 09-09-11 at 11:52 AM.

  4. #1314
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,249

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    No, Con, a poll that is taken online is unscientific regardless of the results. Looks like we've stumbled upon yet another area you need to bone up on.
    Think the official polls will be any different? How do you think the 25 Plus million unemployed and under employed Americans will vote?

  5. #1315
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    11,265

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post

    Of course it was, the T.E.A. Party was created last year and after the democrat controlled Congress increased the debt and failed to even pass a budget while adding trillions to the debt. Only a liberal would claim that adding 4 trillion to the debt in less than 3 years isn't a problem. Just shows how little credibility liberals have today. Democrats controlled Congress for two years and did what? No budget! 800+ billion stimulus that failed, Obamacare job killer, 4 trillion added to the debt but you blame the T.E.A. Party. Typical liberalism
    Riiight ... here are the deficits generated by Bush's budgets:

    2002: 420,772,553,397
    2003: 554,995,097,146
    2004: 595,821,633,587
    2005: 553,656,965,393
    2006: 574,264,237,492
    2007: 500,679,473,047
    2008: 1,017,071,524,650

    Here's the increase just from Oct 1, 2008 until Jan 20, 2009:

    602,152,152,001

    Teabaggers had no complaints about any of that debt. Obama is president for a week, and suddenly they feel the need to create a grass roots movement because debt is too high.



  6. #1316
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    11,265

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post

    Think the official polls will be any different?
    If you had an official poll to make the point your unofficial poll made, you would have used it.

  7. #1317
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,249

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    Riiight ... here are the deficits generated by Bush's budgets:

    2002: 420,772,553,397
    2003: 554,995,097,146
    2004: 595,821,633,587
    2005: 553,656,965,393
    2006: 574,264,237,492
    2007: 500,679,473,047
    2008: 1,017,071,524,650

    Here's the increase just from Oct 1, 2008 until Jan 20, 2009:

    602,152,152,001

    Teabaggers had no complaints about any of that debt. Obama is president for a week, and suddenly they feel the need to create a grass roots movement because debt is too high.


    Not when "your" President submits Budgets 500 billion more than the last Bush budget and not when "Your" President approved of those budgets in 2007-2008-2009 and "Your" President was part of the Congress that appropriated the money then had "your" President's appointees spending the 2009 money. Interesting how you always try and divert to Bush which of course is all you can do with the Obama record there for all to see.

  8. #1318
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,249

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheik Yerbuti View Post
    If you had an official poll to make the point your unofficial poll made, you would have used it.
    Too early after the speech for an official poll. That will be available on Monday. You must really be proud of cutting SS and Medicare to create more spendable income so that jobs can be created? Thought tax cuts don't create jobs?

  9. #1319
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Of course it was, the T.E.A. Party was created last year and after the democrat controlled Congress increased the debt and failed to even pass a budget while adding trillions to the debt. Only a liberal would claim that adding 4 trillion to the debt in less than 3 years isn't a problem. Just shows how little credibility liberals have today. Democrats controlled Congress for two years and did what? No budget! 800+ billion stimulus that failed, Obamacare job killer, 4 trillion added to the debt but you blame the T.E.A. Party. Typical liberalism
    You wrong the Tea Party was created in 2009 and participated in the April 15 march on Washington. Brain cells a little rusty there, Conservative?

  10. #1320
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:31 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    11,265

    Re: Employers add no net jobs in Aug.; rate unchanged

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Not when "your" President submits Budgets 500 billion more than the last Bush budget and not when "Your" President approved of those budgets in 2007-2008-2009 and "Your" President was part of the Congress that appropriated the money then had "your" President's appointees spending the 2009 money. Interesting how you always try and divert to Bush which of course is all you can do with the Obama record there for all to see.
    This is just another shining example of your blatant dishonesty. The reason for the increase in Obama's budget is directly related to him added the cost of the wars into it. Had Bush put the cost of the wars into the budget, his proposed budgets would have been significantly higher.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •