Good for her. She blasted Obama for being incompetent...black supporters of Obama based solely on his race for being morons...why shouldnt she go after the Tea Party too?
Unfortunately, Waters reflects her party to a "T".
An opinion voiced by Perry, and thought by many Americans that would rather not see Vimar repeated.or calling people treasonous
Usually liberals calling conservatives, or TEA party members that, most recently by the VP...Good job...or terrorists
The anti Colonialist bent Obama Sr. had is quite telling in the current President's opinion of his own country.or emphasising someone's father's African background
Or just that liberals, including euro quasi socialists are adept at the dishonest method of holding one to a standard they have no intention of abiding by.yea the US right and the Tea Party are masters of the hidden attack
No she isn't, she is a study in disingenuousness. But I guess in liberal circles that is to be praised.at least Rep Walters is honest and direct and call them on it.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
In any case, Luntz is no where near the same as Allinsky, the author of 'rules for radicals'... to even try to make that case, I am sure that Allinsky would be insulted....
Cognitive linguistics is the cornersone of Republican messaging.
Its why everything one hears from them is repetitive and term-specific. No divergence from the "message" can be tolerated because that would change what they "hear".
Almost the entire Republican platform is based on 30 years of "framing" issues, using what they know about how your brain works that you don't.
And the Democrats are catching up fast. Which is NOT a good thing.
Anyone wondering what I'm talking about start here:
The Psychology of Persuasion