• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Huntsman on evolution, warming: 'Call me crazy'

And the racial gaps don't close. It's a calibration issue.

As for the canard that all the measure is how well one takes tests, only an ignoramus working on superficial knowledge would make that statement.

For some reason liberals look down on people who ignore evidence and think people and dinosaurs existed at the same time, but when it comes time to protecting their biased view of reality, talking out of their ass is just fine and dandy. Go figure.


You seem to use this wide brush for liberals as a group in multiple threads. “liberals “look down…liberals …have this problem, liberals blah,blah,blah.

What studies have you conducted that have determined that all liberals meet the criteria of the bull**** you lay down?:2wave:
 
Evolution is one of the two foundation laws of biology. Every life science, meaning everything from zoology, medicine, genetics, botany, and so on, is based on evolution. Much of the food you buy, cancer drugs, antibiotics..... much of what we take for granted in our every day lives, and the vast majority of medical advances of the last century that have improved life for all of humanity.... all have a foundational basis in evolution. Denying evolution is like denying the laws of physics, it is a refusal to accept reality.

So far we have one candidate in the entire GOP field that has taken the rational position of accepting the physical world for what it is.

Ahh, but the existence of limited evolution doesn’t rule out the existence of God. Care to explain why monkeys have stopped evolving into men? Where are all of those cross species specimens that prove man came from monkeys?

Evolution, as it was taught when I was in grade school, is a pile of warm excrement based upon half truth and half religion, just as the current AGW theories are.

BTW, I am an agnostic on all three issues, and just as smart as any of you.
 
Huntsman doesn't stand a snowball's chance of even getting the nomination, much less of getting elected. I wouldn't worry about it.
 
A Republican with integrity and an intellect. Nope, he will never be the GOP nominee. Another blowhard science denier Texan is much more their speed!

Bush had both but I still couldn’t stand him.

BTW, don’t you have some liberal posts that you haven’t given a “like” to that you should be tending to?
 
Huntsman doesn't stand a snowball's chance of even getting the nomination, much less of getting elected. I wouldn't worry about it.

Shhhhh, don't tell them that or the liberals will stop sending money to him.
 
Bush had both but I still couldn’t stand him.

BTW, don’t you have some liberal posts that you haven’t given a “like” to that you should be tending to?

The Iraq war proves your opinion wrong. He either lied about the threat Iraq presented to the US, or he was duped. So, he could not have had both integrity and intellect. One or the other would be a stretch, but both he certainly did not possess. :sun
 
Shhhhh, don't tell them that or the liberals will stop sending money to him.


I think I will keep my dough in my sock for a awhile longer. During the congressional election last year I donated to two failing elections. One in New York's 9th (Weiner ),the other in Florida's 8th (Grayson).Sadly I have began to think I just might be a jinx.:(
 
The Iraq war proves your opinion wrong. He either lied about the threat Iraq presented to the US, or he was duped. So, he could not have had both integrity and intellect. One or the other would be a stretch, but both he certainly did not possess. :sun
He was duped by the CIA. Not too fast with the facts are you?

How about Obama and that “only a few weeks” war in Libya? Do you give him a pass for his ignorance or are you too partisan to hold him to the same level of scrutiny you hold others to?
 
The average IQ will always be 100. lol


Hhmmm…you can look at the current group of candidates running for the republican nomination and still say it’s that high? Amazing.:2wave:
 
He was duped by the CIA. Not too fast with the facts are you?
They duped him by saying Iraq was unlikely to attack the US directly and by proxy. That's what tricked the Bush Admin into thinking we couldn't wait any longer lest there be a mushroom cloud over an American city.

LOL
 
Hhmmm…you can look at the current group of candidates running for the republican nomination and still say it’s that high? Amazing.:2wave:
And, the quotient part is why the average will be 100
 
You were whooshed by whoever taught you about evolution

No I wasn't. My text book had this same image in it:

evolution.jpg

If you care to declare that evolutionism hasn’t been introduced an alternative to creationism for more than a century, please do so. If not, please be more specific with your comments in the future or I won’t bother to respond.
 
Didn't we have an IQ thread a few years back?I think DP,s average IQ was around 150 or so.:roll:
numbers.png
 
Provide the titles of these studies, please, so that I can actually view them myself. I prefer to review sources myself instead of assuming that the second-hand (or even third-hand) information is accurately portrayed.

Also, pretending that you can shoot things down by simply stating they are false is just pure nonsense.

Riverdad, in case you missed this post before I was wondering if you could supply the titles of these studies you mentioned but failed to cite so that I can view them for myself.
 
Back
Top Bottom