No, he is a "journaist" (sic) ( a word a moron like yourself can't even spell) in a national newspaper, He refers to scientists in his column and the studies which have been done. These studies are available to everyone, but an ignorant piece of cow dung like yourself apparently can't process that into your poorly educated head.No, do you need help learning the difference between a journalist who has an open agenda and a scientist? Obviously you do since you are clearly under the asinine belief that Solomon is a scientist.
He is writing about the science, the background and the consequences. Can't you even decipher that much?I do not get any of my scientific information from journalists because journalists are so often clueless about science.
How do you suppose the word "media" is defined? You don't know that either? Does this have to be explained to you as well?Depends on how you define media. If you define media to include real scientific publications, I will get my scientific information from them from time to time.
I'll wager a 'moron' like yourself just looks at the pictures.Scientific American, for example, is a publication I will read. I usually go to the primary sources anyway, though.
No you'll be a thick, stupid and rude buffoon in any environment.I only come across as thick to those who prefer to wallow in ignorance.