AHA! So he has a profit motive! And this make you suspicious, huh?, and unwilling to accept the what is being said. It seems you share the same closed mind shared by many little lefty brains and can't absorb information which conflicts with their beliefs, usually gained from an article which they first read on any subject.
No, he has a profit motive AND his information conflicts with that which actually exists in the article he purports to cite. When you willfully ignore that latter bit, it might appear to be closed mindedness, but when you
actually take all of the information in, instead of making up nonsense to replace that which you do not wish to acknowledge, you'll see that there is more than just the profit motivation involved.
No, he is a "journaist" (sic) ( a word a moron like yourself can't even spell)
See,
this kind of idiocy is why people think you are a retard, grant.
Anyone with even the slightest amount of intelligence would be capable of recognizing that this is not a spelling error, but instead a
typographical error where I accidentally ommitted the "L".
This is because those who have working brains would be able to note that I spelled the word correctly later on in the
same post. But apparently your feeble little pea brain is incapable of actually taking in
all of the evidence presented to you when there is a perfectly retarded explanation for you to latch on to.
in a national newspaper, He refers to scientists in his column and the studies which have been done.
I read to the
actual study be claims to be referencing, so I am fully aware that his interpretation of what the study said is false. Therefore, I have to take
everything else he says with a grain of salt due to teh fact that I know for a fact he is not above making **** up.
These studies are available to everyone, but an ignorant piece of cow dung like yourself apparently can't process that into your poorly educated head.
Again, your feeble mind failed to take in all of the information available to you. I specifically noted that I
had read the study in question in the very first sentence of the post you are quoting. But, as usual, an intelligent analysis of the data fell outside of your intellectual capacities.
He is writing about the science, the background and the consequences. Can't you even decipher that much?
Here's a little fact for you, since it is doubtful that your intellectual capacities are of a level high enough to intuit these facts on your own. Just because someone writes about science, the background and the consequences doesn't mean they know what they are talking about, nor does it mean that they are doing so honestly. People
can lie. In this case, we know that Solomon
is lying because he makes a claim about the CERN article which is
definitely not true.
It does not "all-but-settle" the issue. No single study can
ever do that, but it is especially true of a study such as this one that got the results that it did CERN. One very specific thing that was mentioned in the CERN study itself was that cosmic rays alone could
not account for everything.
How do you suppose the word "media" is defined? You don't know that either? Does this have to be explained to you as well?
The media encompasses many groups, not simply news organizations.
You decided to use that term, while I stuck with a more specific term of "journalists".
But I'm willing to answer questions, even if they
are posed by dishonest and ignorant people.
I'll wager a 'moron' like yourself just looks at the pictures.
As the old saying goes, a fool and his money are soon parted. How much are you willing to lose on this wager?
No you'll be a thick, stupid and rude buffoon in any environment.
Rude I'll accept. I'm certainly rude.
But you have to be smarter than someone to actually know if they are stupid or thick, grant. This is simply not the case here. It's like how a brainless sea sponge doesn't have the intellectual capacities to judge the intelligence of a chihuahua. Even though the chihuahua
may indeed be stupid, the sea sponge is so over-matched by the chihuahua intellectually that it simply does not have the capacity to judge said chihuahu.
While I might be a rude little chihuahua, no sea sponge can judge me to be stupid. Just sayin'.