• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rasmussen: Rick Perry now up 11 points on GOP field

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are two houses of Congress, Guess you missed that in the civics class you say you have taken

Very good -- you paid attention when Government Rock came on TV I see! Boehner is Speaker of the House. He doesn't just represent his own district. He is the most powerful and visible Republican in Washington.
 
Yep, net job gain, more employed, increase in labor force vs. Obama's net job loss, declining labor force. Sell that one.

Rick Perry: Positive growth in publicly funded jobs and negative growth in privately funded jobs. Yee-haw!!!!!!!!!!!! :sun
 
Right, a net job gain of Perry's is as bad as the net job loss of Obama's. Do you understand how foolish you look?

Considering that the critique is coming from a coal black kettle....I'm not very concerned.
 
Rick Perr: Positive growth in publicly funded jobs and negative growth in privately funded jobs. Yee-haw!!!!!!!!!!!! :sun

net job gain double the unemployment YEEEEE HAWWWW!
 
Rick Perr: Positive growth in publicly funded jobs and negative growth in privately funded jobs. Yee-haw!!!!!!!!!!!! :sun

So you claim, now prove it? 1.8 million govt. jobs out of a 11 million dollar employment base and over 12 million labor force. How does that compare to your state?
 
Very good -- you paid attention when Government Rock came on TV I see! Boehner is Speaker of the House. He doesn't just represent his own district. He is the most powerful and visible Republican in Washington.

And if it weren't for the House the deficit wouldn't come in at 1.3 trillion and would have been much, much higher.
 
So you claim, now prove it? 1.8 million govt. jobs out of a 11 million dollar employment base and over 12 million labor force. How does that compare to your state?

Well I hope people in his state get paid more than a dollar aday.
 
And if it weren't for the House the deficit wouldn't come in at 1.3 trillion and would have been much, much higher.

Actually, if it wasn't for the House we would have had over $4 trillion in deficit reduction and the stock market wouldn't have taken a dive. Thanks, Republicans. Again.
 
Feel very badly for you as the 2009 deficit is on Obama's watch, just like the 2001 deficit was charged to Bush. The Obama record speaks for itself and is indefensible which is why you don't even try.
All that means is that you know most of the of the $1.9T deficit of FY2009 was due to Bush's budget short fall but you have no qualms about blaming Obama for it.

At least we set the record straight on that.
 
net job gain double the unemployment YEEEEE HAWWWW!

We count on you Texans to inform the rest of the country just what a company shill Perry has become.

BTW, even if I didn't know you were from Texas, I could tell by the drawl of your "YEEEEE HAWWWW". Much more authentic than my attempt with Yee-Haw! :sun
 
Actually, if it wasn't for the House we would have had over $4 trillion in deficit reduction and the stock market wouldn't have taken a dive. Thanks, Republicans. Again.

Interesting and yet we have never seen an Obama proposal on paper so how do you know? You still buy the Obama lies? Guess some people never learn.
 
My father worked in the CC camps in Oregon for .50 a day and never whined as much as you whine ever day.

That would make another great Perry slogan Con "GOP 2012 - Perry "You should be grateful for your below minimum wage job......"
 
Yep, net job gain, more employed, increase in labor force vs. Obama's net job loss, declining labor force. Sell that one.
Perry lost jobs in the private sector, so their net gains come from increasing the size of government ... I thought Conservatives were against that? Now they're running for president on that platform? Vote for Perry because he increases the size of government?
 
That would make another great Perry slogan Con "GOP 2012 - Perry "You should be grateful for your below minimum wage job......"

How you coming on posting those California minimum wage jobs based on the California minimum wage?
 
So you claim, now prove it? 1.8 million govt. jobs out of a 11 million dollar employment base and over 12 million labor force. How does that compare to your state?

I guess you didn't watch the news report from Anderson Cooper I posted. Go back and watch it.
 
Perry lost jobs in the private sector, so their net gains come from increasing the size of government ... I thought Conservatives were against that? Now they're running for president on that platform? Vote for Perry because he increases the size of government?

So we have been told, better tell that to BLS because that isn't what they show. Obama has increased the size of govt. as well but no concern. If Perry is doing that then does he have your support?
 
That would make another great Perry slogan Con "GOP 2012 - Perry "You should be grateful for your below minimum wage job......"

Sorry, no Palin in your sig. Its a no go
 
I guess you didn't watch the news report from Anderson Cooper I posted. Go back and watch it.

No, I prefer Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers which are non partisan and in context
 
All that means is that you know most of the of the $1.9T deficit of FY2009 was due to Bush's budget short fall but you have no qualms about blaming Obama for it.

At least we set the record straight on that.

Oh, absolutely and has been reported lately the Earthquake on the East Coast was due to the Bush fault.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom