• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rasmussen: Rick Perry now up 11 points on GOP field

Status
Not open for further replies.
Conservative said:
You mean taxpayer money that came from Texans just like taxpayers from other states actually coming back to TX? Say it isn't so. Seems that you and so many others forget that Texans sent money to D.C. and as a results why not get some of it back?
Click to expand...

So it is ok when the state you live in takes stimulus money and uses it to balance their budget and create jobs.

hypocrite.jpg
 
donc said:


I sure hope perry gets the chance to run against OUR PRESIDENT.With any luck at all he will have bachman as his running mate.Here,s a good video take a peek, preferably after your evening nap.:2wave:
Click to expand...


BLS??? Isn't that the Holy Grail for the The Conservative?
 
Goldenboy219 said:
This is the opinion of Roubini, Rogoff, and Behravesh.

I just happen to agree.
Click to expand...

As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you, Libertarian?
 
Catawba said:
BLS??? Isn't that the Holy Grail for the The Conservative?
Click to expand...

Yep, the BLS that shows a net job gain, more people working, increasing labor force vs Obama, net job loss, less people working, and declining labor force. That is the data on BLS
 
Conservative said:
As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you, Libertarian?
Click to expand...

So instead of being able to refute my statements, you decide to resort to repeating yourself and attacking me on a personal level. If you are unable to debate with any dignity, maybe you should refrain from doing so :shrug:
 
Goldenboy219 said:
So it is ok when the state you live in takes stimulus money and uses it to balance their budget and create jobs.

View attachment 67115204
Click to expand...

As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you,
 
Goldenboy219 said:
So instead of being able to refute my statements, you decide to resort to repeating yourself and attacking me on a personal level. If you are unable to debate with any dignity, maybe you should refrain from doing so :shrug:
Click to expand...

Cite for me the personal attack and if you feel I am attacking you then report it like others have done
 
Conservative said:
Yep, the BLS that shows a net job gain, more people working, increasing labor force vs Obama, net job loss, less people working, and declining labor force. That is the data on BLS
Click to expand...

That is right, all it shows is the labor force volatility. It does not in any way prove which economic policies were the more helpful because there are a great deal of other variables that supersede the slight differences in all U.S. presidential administrations.
 
Conservative said:
As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you,
Click to expand...

Why even bother responding if you lack the ability to address my comment?
 
Goldenboy219 said:
That is right, all it shows is the labor force volatility. It does not in any way prove which economic policies were the more helpful because there are a great deal of other variables that supersede the slight differences in all U.S. presidential administrations.
Click to expand...

As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you,

Obama should thank TX for making his numbers look better
 
donc said:
Only those that post random bls numbers.:thumbs:
Click to expand...


You mean the BLS that shows the following:

As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you,
 
Conservative said:
Yep, the BLS that shows a net job gain, more people working, increasing labor force vs Obama, net job loss, less people working, and declining labor force. That is the data on BLS
Click to expand...
So where are the bills he signed to make that happen? Unemployment in Texas was 4.2% when Perry became governor ... what bills did he pass into law to keep unemployment down?
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
So where are the bills he signed to make that happen? Unemployment in Texas was 4.2% when Perry became governor ... what bills did he pass into law to keep unemployment down?
Click to expand...

Whoaaa so unemployment doubled on his watch:shock:
 
150 pages... sh!t, Perry has obviously touched a nerve.
 
winston53660 said:
Whoaaa so unemployment doubled on his watch:shock:
Click to expand...

The legislative record of Obama's wasnt important when he was running but now all of sudden it is what legislation Perry signed that led to the numbers in the state? How do I post Goldenboy's hypocrit picture because that is all liberals are. You see, results don't matter to a liberal as evidenced by the group here still supporting Obama and then challenging the Perry record. This is quite funny
 
deltabtry said:
150 pages... sh!t, Perry has obviously touched a nerve.
Click to expand...

When liberals don't have a record to run on they always go for the throat with politics of personal destruction. Anything to divert from the Obama record. Good to see you here as it has been lonesome
 
deltabtry said:
150 pages... sh!t, Perry has obviously touched a nerve.
Click to expand...
Not hard to hit 150 pages with 700 posts of:


Obama economic results in 2011, .4% GDP and 1.3% GDP growth in 2011, 25+ million unemployed or under employed Americans in 2011, 4 trillion added to the debt in less than 3 years, and a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. Rising Misery index 7.83 to 12.67. First President in U.S. History to have our credit downgraded on his watch! 38% JAR and well over 50% disapproval ratings.​
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Not hard to hit 150 pages with 700 posts of:


Obama economic results in 2011, .4% GDP and 1.3% GDP growth in 2011, 25+ million unemployed or under employed Americans in 2011, 4 trillion added to the debt in less than 3 years, and a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. Rising Misery index 7.83 to 12.67. First President in U.S. History to have our credit downgraded on his watch! 38% JAR and well over 50% disapproval ratings.​
Click to expand...

Don't forget

As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you,
 
Conservative said:
The legislative record of Obama's wasnt important when he was running but now all of sudden it is what legislation Perry signed that led to the numbers in the state? How do I post Goldenboy's hypocrit picture because that is all liberals are. You see, results don't matter to a liberal as evidenced by the group here still supporting Obama and then challenging the Perry record. This is quite funny
Click to expand...

So you want to talk about Obama now go for it. Bring up a salient argument / position and it might be interesting.

But remember the topic of the thread is Perry.:peace
 
winston53660 said:
So you want to talk about Obama now go for it. Bring up a salient argument / position and it might be interesting.

But remember the topic of the thread is Perry.:peace
Click to expand...

Right, I apologize

As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you,
 
Conservative said:
When liberals don't have a record to run on they always go for the throat with politics of personal destruction.
Click to expand...
Is that a admission of guilt that Republicans had nothing to run on in the last presidential election when they were trying to paint Obama as a Indonesian Moslem with more social security numbers than aliases who hung out with terrorists and racist preachers and didn't have a birth certificate?
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Is that a admission of guilt that Republicans had nothing to run on in the last presidential election when they were trying to paint Obama as a Indonesian Moslem with more social security numbers than aliases who hung out with terrorists and racist preachers and didn't have a birth certificate?
Click to expand...

Won't have that problem this time as he has a record to run on. Want me to post it again? But to stick with the thread topic

As stated, Perry, net job gain, growing labor force, more jobs created, balanced budget; Obama, net job loss, declining labor force, fewer people working, 4 trillion added to the debt. How is that hope and change working out for you,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom