- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
He is the country's worst nightmare, totally incompetent which is probably why you support him
Your article,
March 30, 2011
I know, I have been a complete and total failure, just ask a liberal.
He sure did, that is why he has a 39% Job Approval rating due to the following results
Obama economic results in 2011, .4% GDP and 1.3% GDP growth in 2011, 24+ million unemployed or under employed Americans in 2011, 4 trillion added to the debt in less than 3 years, and a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. Rising Misery index 7.83 to 12.67. First President in U.S. History to have our credit downgraded on his watch!
He is the country's worst nightmare, totally incompetent which is probably why you support him
Your article,
March 30, 2011
The article you posted is dated, March 30, 2011. You need to get newer information
Obama's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Ever, According to Gallup
Rightwingers believe the first $10T of debt is not a problem
What does that have to do with the thread topic?
Obama's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Ever, According to Gallup
Love those March 2011 articles, guess that trumps the current poll numbers
Obama's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Ever, According to Gallup
What does that have to do with the thread topic?
Obama's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Ever, According to Gallup
But what does the vague phrase “handling his job as president” actually mean? A fundamental [textbook] assumption in asking any survey question is that the question should mean the same thing to each and every respondent. It should also mean essentially the same thing a week, a month or a year from now that it does today. If not, then we are comparing apples with oranges, and any such comparisons are ipso facto, invalid, in a word, meaningless.
It only matters in that you made that claim. If you would prefer to rescind that claim, it's no skin off my back.What difference does it make? He admitted he will be a one term president if it isn’t turned around in 3 years.
Ok, so you're on record for believing that losing 800,000 payroll jobs in a single month where the unemployment rate is 7.8% is better than gaining 117,000 payroll jobs in a month where the unemployment rate is 9.1%. By the way, how many months do you think think country can sustain losing 500,000 to 800,000 payroll jobs per month? Wait, before you answer, here's a clue since that is what happened for 9 months between October, 2008 and June, 2009 ... 6 million payroll jobs were lost and the unemployment rate skyrocketed 44% from 6.6% to 9.5%.Which parts did you miss?
Gaining jobs per month when the percentage of unemployed has increased?
The price of gold has gone up also, and we can give credit to Barrack Obama for that too.
Ok, so you're on record for believing that losing 800,000 payroll jobs in a single month where the unemployment rate is 7.8% is better than gaining 117,000 payroll jobs in a month where the unemployment rate is 9.1%. By the way, how many months do you think think country can sustain losing 500,000 to 800,000 payroll jobs per month? Wait, before you answer, here's a clue since that is what happened for 9 months between October, 2008 and June, 2009 ... 6 million payroll jobs were lost and the unemployment rate skyrocketed 44% from 6.6% to 9.5%.
Not at all. Those are equally meaningless in predicting who will win the election next year. The reason for posting them is to show you that as of now (not 15 months from now) the GOP doesn't have a single candidate who beats Obama; which shows that either a) Obama isn't doing as bad as you seem to think; or b) despite how bad he's doing, he's still preferred above anybody the GOP can put up against him to fix the economy; or c) a combination of a and b. But make no mistake, I never once posted those polls to predict Obama would win next year. Only an imbecile of the highest magnitude would think a poll today can predict who will win an election 15 months from now.Oh, I see Obama polls are meaningless but polls showing potential candidates vs. Obama and of course Bush ratings are accurate and meaningful.
Not at all. Those are equally meaningless in predicting who will win the election next year. The reason for posting them is to show you that as of now (not 15 months from now) the GOP doesn't have a single candidate who beats Obama; which shows that either a) Obama isn't doing as bad as you seem to think; or b) despite how bad he's doing, he's still preferred above anybody the GOP can put up against him to fix the economy; or c) a combination of a and b. But make no mistake, I never once posted those polls to predict Obama would win next year. Only an imbecile of the highest magnitude would think a poll today can predict who will win an election 15 months from now.
I would like to stay longer to explain why but my wife just showed me this hysterical video of Michele Bachmann making a complete fool of herself today by celebrating Elvis Presley's birthday in front of crowd of gawkers ... only today isn't Elvis's birthday ... it's the anniversary of the day he died!!! So I'm off to the Michele Bachmann thread for some laughs!
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
Her only saving grace is that only about 300 gawkers came out to support her as she made an ass of herself....
Yeah, you keep wondering that. Meanwhile, Bachman has made more idiotic gaffs in three weeks than Obama has made in three years. :lol:
Obama himself said he wouldn’t be re-elected if he didn’t turn this economy around. He knew he couldn’t get by on 4 years of “it isn’t my fault” or “it would have been worse”.No they don't, JAR's are NOT a predictor of whether a president will be reelected or not.
Obama himself said he wouldn’t be re-elected if he didn’t turn this economy around. He knew he couldn’t get by on 4 years of “it isn’t my fault” or “it would have been worse”.
Unless something drastic happens and the economy rebounds or we go to war with Iran or China, Obama is toast. He knew it then and he knows it now.
Does he really? Are you saying there are no polls that show Obama losing?Meanwhile, he still leads each and every republican contender AND a generic republican contender in polls. I guess he didn't anticipate how pathetic the opposition would be.
Ok, so you're on record for believing that losing 800,000 payroll jobs in a single month where the unemployment rate is 7.8% is better than gaining 117,000 payroll jobs in a month where the unemployment rate is 9.1%. By the way, how many months do you think think country can sustain losing 500,000 to 800,000 payroll jobs per month? Wait, before you answer, here's a clue since that is what happened for 9 months between October, 2008 and June, 2009 ... 6 million payroll jobs were lost and the unemployment rate skyrocketed 44% from 6.6% to 9.5%.