Redress, I'd like you to review the two sets of answers you have given, one for opposing and one for not opposing SSM, and then read my explanation for why the opposition to SSM is rooted in homophobia and hatred
Please note that the lack of opposition is based on your conclusion that SSM will not have any bad consequences for you. People do not object to changes that will not affect them (or will have a beneficial effect on them). People only object to change when they believe the change will have a negative effect on them (or their family, or society at large, etc)
Now note that the reasons you give for opposing SSM are based on change. Your arguments here are based on not wanting to change. But as I noted above, people do not object to change that has either a good effect or no effect on them. Obviously, the objection to this change (ie allowing SSM) is a perception that allowing SSM will have a deleterious effect on the people who object to SSM. Now here's the kicker
People do not love change that is bad for them. People do not even like change that is bad for them. People are not even merely nuetral about change that is bad for them. People don't like (ie hate) change that is bad for them. Bad consequences are something that is to be feared and fear leads to hate. This doesn't mean that the idea of SSM causes the homophobes to curl up into a ball, quivering with fear and anger, but since SSM is seen (by the homophobes) as something that will lead to bad consequences for them, SS is seen as a threat. Threats are things which are feared (this is just human (and animal) nature), and fear leads to hate (again, this is just human nature).
And because this perception of bad consequences, threats and fears are based on strong opinions of what SSM will lead to, I beleive that any and all opposition to SSM is rooted in bigoted hate and homophobia. So if you can, tell me where I'm wrong