• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

United States loses its AAA Credit rating from S & P

Status
Not open for further replies.
And if you read the dictionary, even just a little bit, you would see that you saying Obama is marxist is rediculous and hyperbolic...

LOL. Okay. What is he? Can you provide evidence in his background and associations to show he is something other than a Marxist?

But please, don't let me get in the way of your distorted view of reality.
Don't worry about it. You are not in my way.
 
please present any writings or speeches or legislation that proves Barack Obama is a Marxist.
LOL. Amazing. Have you read anything I have written prior to this post. We know your reflexes are good. That knee-jerk is exactly what one would expect.
 
please present any writings or speeches or legislation that proves Barack Obama is a Marxist.

Yeah I personally liked the part where he signed proudly legislation that forces people to buy a product from private corporations (HMO's) SO MARXIST!!!!!!!!

What Mist doesn't seem to understand, is that even if Obama was a "Marxist" He's a pretty crappy excuse for one, and would have marx rolling in his grave. And I know I used to be a Marxist.
 
Yeah I personally liked the part where he signed proudly legislation that forces people to buy a product from private corporations (HMO's) SO MARXIST!!!!!!!!

What Mist doesn't seem to understand, is that even if Obama was a "Marxist" He's a pretty crappy excuse for one, and would have marx rolling in his grave. And I know I used to be a Marxist.

You are a little bit slow. Perhaps it is the late hour. You confuse tactics with strategy.
 
If we are serious about determining a person's core beliefs we should examine the lives of the people closest to them. Let's begin with Barrack Hussein Obama. He was a socialist. Do we all agree now that he was a socialist? I have provided you the evidence in his own words. His son, the one term Marxist president Obama, wrote a book called Dreams From My Father. When measuring the character of the son should his book be taken into account? And should his father's socialist politics be discounted or assessed?

Next is his mother. She was clearly a smart woman. She married Barrack Hussein Obama, the socialist and bore him a son who carries his name. Was she an influence on the one term Marxist president Obama? We should consider the possibility. Was she a socialist too? I believe she was. But I have yet to run the facts to ground in a way that the honest among you will grudgingly accept.

From there we can move on to other people he mentions but fails to adequately identify in his two books. Who, for example was Frank?

For those of you with the stomach for the truth you could help. Is it the truth you seek? Or is it something else?

Four paragraphs and it boils down to this “Was she a socialist too? I believe she was." How does your believing that his mother was a socialist make the sons “core beliefs “ socialistic?

Whatever credibility you had left is quickly fading with all of this conspiracy **** your throwing up.

Pretty soon you will be so much background noise, relegated to DP Tinnitus, like another poster in this thread that spams with irrelevant links that no one reads or responds to.:2wave:
 
The federal government's financial condition deteriorated rapidly last year, far beyond the $1.5 trillion in new debt taken on to finance the budget deficit, a USA TODAY analysis shows.

The government added $5.3 trillion in new financial obligations in 2010, largely for retirement programs such as Medicare and Social Security. That brings to a record $61.6 trillion the total of financial promises not paid for.

Medicare alone took on $1.8 trillion in new liabilities, more than the record deficit prompting heated debate between Congress and the White House over lifting the debt ceiling.

U.S. funding for future promises lags by trillions - USATODAY.com

if something isn't done NOW to fundamentally restructure our budgets, then our big 3 federal entitlements (as well as state pensions) will simply disappear as we have come to know them

because there's just not enough money on the planet to make good all that 61.6T

policy trumps personalities

and their pimps

leadership, anyone?
 
You solve all this by returning to a government which operates within it's constitutional boundaries and the states reasserting it's states rights.

Ha,ha, that definitely is not the Republican party!


OBAMA WILL SPEND LESS--WAY LESS--THAN BUSH
Over time, and through the hate-filled chatter of the blogs and the talk shows, we have all acquired the sense that our two political parties have fundamentally different views of government. Democrats favor big-government programs that solve the world's problems, and Republicans prefer smaller and leaner government that stays out of the way of the private sector.

But the record says the opposite.
Obama Will Spend Less--Way Less!--Than Bush - Forbes.com

 
Meanwhile back to the topic of the thread. :2wave:

< A Standard & Poor’s director said for the first time Thursday that one reason the United States lost its triple-A credit rating was that several lawmakers expressed skepticism about the serious consequences of a credit default — a position put forth by some Republicans.>



<“That a country even has such voices, albeit a minority, is something notable,” he added. “This kind of rhetoric is not common amongst AAA sovereigns.”>






Read more: S&P: Debt default skeptics fueled ratings downgrade - Josh Boak - POLITICO.com
 
If we are serious about determining a person's core beliefs we should examine the lives of the people closest to them. Let's begin with Barrack Hussein Obama. He was a socialist. Do we all agree now that he was a socialist? I have provided you the evidence in his own words. His son, the one term Marxist president Obama, wrote a book called Dreams From My Father. When measuring the character of the son should his book be taken into account? And should his father's socialist politics be discounted or assessed?

Next is his mother. She was clearly a smart woman. She married Barrack Hussein Obama, the socialist and bore him a son who carries his name. Was she an influence on the one term Marxist president Obama? We should consider the possibility. Was she a socialist too? I believe she was. But I have yet to run the facts to ground in a way that the honest among you will grudgingly accept.

From there we can move on to other people he mentions but fails to adequately identify in his two books. Who, for example was Frank?

For those of you with the stomach for the truth you could help. Is it the truth you seek? Or is it something else?


Maybe someone should have looked into George W Bush's relationship with Osama Bin Laden's family before we elected him President?

"If you do business with terrorists, if you support or succor them, you will not do business with the United States," said President Bush.

He didn't say anything about doing business with a terrorist's brother - or his wealthy financier.

When President George W. Bush froze assets connected to Osama bin Laden, he didn't tell the American people that the terrorist mastermind's late brother was an investor in the president's former oil business in Texas. He also hasn't leveled with the American public about his financial connections to a host of shady Saudi characters involved in drug cartels, gun smuggling, and terrorist networks.

Bush's Former Oil Company Linked To bin Laden Family
 
Yeah I personally liked the part where he signed proudly legislation that forces people to buy a product from private corporations (HMO's) SO MARXIST!!!!!!!!...

requiring Americans to purchase something is Marxism?

was the Militia Act of 1792 Marxist? it required Americans to buy a gun, ammo, powder, and a satchel.

Wow, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, Adams, Hamilton & Washington were Marxists!!!!

:)
 
Maybe someone should have looked into George W Bush's relationship with Osama Bin Laden's family before we elected him President?

"If you do business with terrorists, if you support or succor them, you will not do business with the United States," said President Bush.

He didn't say anything about doing business with a terrorist's brother - or his wealthy financier.

When President George W. Bush froze assets connected to Osama bin Laden, he didn't tell the American people that the terrorist mastermind's late brother was an investor in the president's former oil business in Texas. He also hasn't leveled with the American public about his financial connections to a host of shady Saudi characters involved in drug cartels, gun smuggling, and terrorist networks.

Bush's Former Oil Company Linked To bin Laden Family

Aw 'cmon. I can't stand Bush but this is on a par with claiming that Obama pals around with terrorists because he was on a board with Ayers.

OBL was estranged from his family.
 
requiring Americans to purchase something is Marxism?

was the Militia Act of 1792 Marxist? it required Americans to buy a gun, ammo, powder, and a satchel.

Wow, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, Adams, Hamilton & Washington were Marxists!!!!

:)

Most states require drivers to buy auto liability insurance - I guess most states are Marxist?
 
Most states require drivers to buy auto liability insurance - I guess most states are Marxist?

indeed, my state REQUIRES me to buy at least $50,000 in personal injury liability for my car.

Marxism!!!! GEICO and Allstate Insurance run the gubament!!!!

;)
 
Maybe someone should have looked into George W Bush's relationship with Osama Bin Laden's family before we elected him President?

"If you do business with terrorists, if you support or succor them, you will not do business with the United States," said President Bush.

He didn't say anything about doing business with a terrorist's brother - or his wealthy financier.

When President George W. Bush froze assets connected to Osama bin Laden, he didn't tell the American people that the terrorist mastermind's late brother was an investor in the president's former oil business in Texas. He also hasn't leveled with the American public about his financial connections to a host of shady Saudi characters involved in drug cartels, gun smuggling, and terrorist networks.

Bush's Former Oil Company Linked To bin Laden Family

I would post a picture of George the second strollin and holding hand with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah…whatever but I’m to damn lazy.:(
 
Aw 'cmon. I can't stand Bush but this is on a par with claiming that Obama pals around with terrorists because he was on a board with Ayers.

OBL was estranged from his family.


Obama's father was also estranged from Obama - surely you said the same thing to the poster who is trying to tie Obama's actions to those of his father? Why not?
 
Obama's father was also estranged from Obama - surely you said the same thing to the poster who is trying to tie Obama's actions to those of his father? Why not?

I thought it hardly worth mentioning, as Obama barely knew his father. They were together for what, all of three weeks in Obama's entire life?
 
I would post a picture of George the second strollin and holding hand with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah…whatever but I’m to damn lazy.:(

Here, I have one handy!

George_W_Bush_Prince_Abdullah_kiss_.jpg
 
Nearly two years after the economic recovery officially began, job creation continues to stagger at the slowest post-recession rate since the Great Depression.

The nation has 5% fewer jobs today — a loss of 7 million — than it did when the recession began in December 2007. That is by far the worst performance of job generation following any of the dozen recessions since the 1930s.

In the past, the economy recovered lost jobs 13 months on average after a recession. If this were a typical recovery, nearly 10 million more people would be working today than when the recession officially ended in June 2009.

Job creation limps along after recession - USATODAY.com

26 months and counting...

recovery summer, anyone?
 
how is this relevent to the OP?

It's not -- he just robotically spits out random links from a little list he keeps on his desktop. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom