Listen Whoopie Goldberg rarely gets coverage over here in Europe, so why should anything she says about Roman Polanski get coverage here?And, I really sorry you can't read the news. Whoopie Goldberg said on national television, her own show, that Roman Polanski was being persecuted and what it did wasn't rape-rape which is different from rape.
OH nice of you to admit that.I think Mr. Jeff belongs in prison.
And again you are putting words in my mouth. I have never stated either way what I think of the Roman Polanski case... hence the may or may not comment. But since you ask.. yes in principle he should have gone to jail if the case against him was proven back in the day.. but now.. come on... it is more 30 years now. On top of that the judge in the original case was a crazy person. Have you ever looked at the case.. how the judge suddenly changed his mind after originally accepting probation? Not to mention that the statue of limitations is long gone as far as I understand it.The only places you and I disagree is that unlike you, I think Roman Polanski should have gone to prison too, and I don't deny or support his rape of a 13-year old girl.
So it is you that is the hypocrite... in the Roman Polanski case you condemn him without a finished trial, despite the clear evidence of corruption with the Judge, but with the paedophile Christian cult you want "legal evidence" all of a sudden?Oh, and I prefer legal evidence over "reports". I'm quite familiar with "reports".
I am not defending any perverts.. it is you actually that are defending the paedophile Christian cult in question. There is no doubt about the abuse, there is plenty of evidence, but you want "legal evidence" all of a sudden? Is that code for you want to protect their religious beliefs or something? I know the various states use this excuse to keep them in business.. but come on..... there are many former cult members who come time and time with similar accounts. There are the people who testified against Jeff and so on and so on.. The evidence is there, but the US government does nothing to help the young children being abused on a daily basis.If you wish to defend perverts you should try to be a little informed and a little consistent.
What about all the followers? Are you seriously deluded enough to think that a 14 year old girl married off to a 40 year old on the orders of Jeff, is not raped by her new husband as soon as possible? Are you so seriously deluded to dismiss the accusations from multiple former cult members, that children are forced to have sex with each other as soon as the cult deem them sexually mature?To repeat, I thinik Mr. Jeff belongs in prison.
LOL you just dont get the difference eh?.. Polanski may or may not have raped one.. ak 1, uno, une.. girl.. 30 years ago. Also he plead NOT GUILTY to the charges, but in a plea deal he accepted the lesser charge of "unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor".. a plea deal, no admission of guilt as of yet... because the plea deal was in large parts thrown out by a power hungry judge that saw this case as a way to get up in the world.I just wondered if the supporters for the other, admitted, rapist of underage girls would rally to the defense of Mr. Jeff. Apparently, they won't. They'll continue to defend Roman Polanski though.
Jeff and his followers have raped hundreds if not thousands of girls over decades and CONTINUE TO DO IT TODAY!