- Colonel Paul YinglingNobody who wins a war indulges in a bifurcated definition of victory. War is a political act; victory and defeat have meaning only in political terms. A country incapable of achieving its political objectives at an acceptable cost is losing the war, regardless of battlefield events.
Bifurcating victory (e.g. winning militarily, losing politically) is a useful salve for defeated armies. The "stab in the back" narrative helped take the sting out of failure for German generals after WWI and their American counterparts after Vietnam.
All the same, it's nonsense. To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, show me a political loser, and I'll show you a loser.
Windsor v. United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In this case, the House took up the charge after the Attorney General said they will not.
I guess in a way thats smart because when you get exposed this badly what are your real options, you either have to admit your are wrong and theres egg on your face or just lie and act like the other 155 posts in this thread didnt happen
also just to address you meaningless attempt to change the subject, I am 100% fine with polygamy as long as its consensual adults. But again to people that live in REAL life polygamy has one REAL obstacle how do you regulate it law wise, meaning how is property/money/and rights dictated.
SSM doesnt have that problem, nothing changes besides gaining equal rights.
but again please offer ANYTHING of substance that addresses your wrongs in this thread and stays on topic.
also very funny to see you back pedal AGAIN and watch you own logic slap you right in the mouth.