The complaint is not "why not help Borders" but "why not help Borders when you have jumped in to help others". I'm sure you can understand the difference.
I've not seen him ever defend what Bush did BUT Bush is not the president. Bush currently can not carry out hypocritical policies. Now do you want to address why it is that Obama can jump in and save one company and not the other or do you just want to continue with the arguement, BUT BUSH?He subesequently ignored this and continued in with Obama, incorrectly attributing the bailouts as all Obama's doings, and not acknowledging that Bush was the one who implemented the bailouts - not Obama. Add to this that he is both against the bailouts yet would dislike it if Obama bailed out Borders, then there is nothing that the President could do in this situation to meet with his approval.
So, given all this, now you can see why I pointed out the ultrapartisanship displayed in that original comment.[/QUOTE]