You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
Come this time next year Obama wants to be able to point at the GOP and say they raised taxes.
I say screw him, this is Obama's debt and recession lit him do what the people want and change his failed policies, of tax and over spend.
I challenge Obama tp a debate on any subject between Obama and any rock outside my back door and he gets to pick the rock. Of he knows what a rock is.
Obama gets the first question on economic history, If he gets it wrong , game over rock wins.
I put all my my money on the rock, and I can't lose.
Last edited by Councilman; 07-12-11 at 12:05 PM.
The premise you are laying out here is one where I don't get that 3% though, government does. And although the business might not fail due to a 3% increase in taxation, it doesn't have that money to reinvest in the business either, that makes it weaker. Why is it that you think government can spend that 3% wiser than the person earning it? Didn't the stimulus failure show us differently?The other part is your focus on business owners. If they are making over $250,000 in profit (profit is after all costs have been addressed and accounted for) you are in no danger of having your business fail due to a 3% increase in personal taxation. Those additional taxes will be much more helpful for the rest of the country through entitlement programs, education, infrastructure and research into new technologies to improve America. You are much more value than the business owner's 3% in profit taxation and the smart business owner is very much aware of that... you should be aware of that as well.
President Obama's 'Shovel-Ready' Stimulus Joke: The Joke's on Us - Interviews - FoxNews.com
Nah, sorry man, I don't think that the government can do that. So yes, keep the 3% in the hands of those that know how to use it.
Explain to me how that 2% man/woman became in debt to the 98%? IOW, if I break your window, I owe you a debt to fix your window. How is the 2% owe anything to the 98% that didn't earn it?You don't sacrifice benefits for the 98% for the benefit of just the 2%. That's simply illogical.