Women (Nasty or otherwise) are going to be the reason that Donald Trump is NEVER President!
States That Cut The Most Funding Lost The Most Jobs: Analysis
states that cut the most funding lost the most jobs. And according to the site, in fact, the country is split pretty evenly between the 24 states that cut spending between 2007 and 2010, and the 25 that expanded government outlays.
On average, states that increased spending performed significantly better than cost-cutting states, with their unemployment rates actually dropping by 0.2 percent (as opposed to 1 percent increase in cost-cutting states), private-sector employment increasing by 1.4 percent (as opposed to a 2.1 percent loss) and 0.5 percent "real economic growth" since the start of the recession (as compared to a 2.9 percent economic contraction relative to the national economic trend).
Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children. ~ Ancient American Indian Proverb
One might have a high net worth or a low net worth. One might have noble motives, such as a charity, or one might have base and avaricious motives, such as living in opulence. But all are essentially "greedy."
By your reasoning if:
1. If majority votes for a specific tax rate
2. If you are a U.S. citizen
Then, what you pay is termed "your fair share" by sangha.
So 100% taxes could be considered a fair share...but this brilliant reasoning. Obviously absurd.
Or try the reverse for grins. If corporations actually ruled the congress and was able via propoganda to get a majority to pass 0% taxes for the ultra wealthy, and 100% taxes for the middle class, that would be, according to your reasoning, a "fair share".
I can't believe this is what your argument rests on. I mean, I know you probably can't justify taxes any other way, but at least try. The idea that "might makes right" is so unbecoming.