Well, I read the comments on the first page so I can imagine how the rest of the thread went. I believe the bitch is guilty too. But as a legal matter, the prosecution's case was very, very weak. Most important, the medical examiner did not declare Caylee's death a homocide, and also declared the cause of death to be "unknown". I figured the jury would convict because Casey is a hateful person. If they had, I'm pretty sure it would have been overturned on appeal. I believe the jury was sitting in there saying to themselves the following:
Is Casey Anthony a pathological liar, who knows what happened to her daughter and didn't care? Yes. Is she charged with not caring that her daughter is dead? No.
Is there any proof that Casey Anthony caused Caylee's death, deliberately or not deliberately? No.
Is there any proof that Caylee was actually murdered? No.
Is there any evidence that Casey Anthony knew her daughter's body was rotting in a swamp? Yes. Is she charged with improper disposition of a body? No.
If the police had done there jobs and followed up thoroughly on Kronk's report of seeing "what looked like the top of a skull" back in August, there may have been tissue left for toxilogicals, DNA or other evidence available. As it was, I would have had a hard time voting "guilty" for a death that couldn't even be labeled as homocide in the first place. The child could have choked on a hot dog, for all we really know. We'll never learn the truth, because only Casey knows the truth and she isn't capable of telling it.
Anyway, don't hate on me. I would like this cold-hearted bitch to rot in jail, too, but legally the jury really had too little evidence and too much reasonable doubt.