The flame that is between us could set every soul on fire. I would love to take that heat and let's fill the whole world with desire.
Sophie B. Hawkins
You want them to leave a note? Good ****ing lord I want liberals on my jury, let me just say that right up front.
That's absurd. Not reporting her kid missing for 31 days cannot be considered evidecnce someone is hiding oh I don't know, a murder?
The lies can't are not evidence of trying to get out of a murder conviction?
The diary and partying and 31 days and lies are not evidence for motive?
I realize OJ getting off evidenced that people have issues with reality. I naively thought we may have learned something from it.
The searches on the primary care givers computer for chloroform, does not indicate the primary care giver.
The dead smell in the trunk of Casey, doesn't evidence Casey.
Casey's diary and partying she did while her 2 year old is gone unreported, doesn't point to Casey.
I want you all on my jury if I'm framed. It's always possible my dog ate my homework. Seriously.
To the neglect issue--- it wasn't proven that she was murdered, or that she drowned. It WAS proven that she died. So, how could it be child neglect, when the defense said the child drowned? Can one neglect a child that is dead? I think her Dad took the body, told her it was buried, told her to stick with her story and act normal. I also think her relationship with her father was so bizarre, and she was so mentally ill, that she did what Daddy told her to do. The evidence was not there for murder, and child neglect of a dead child doesn't work, nor could they even get her for child neglect for the drowning, because there was no evidence that she even drowned. What else could the jury really do based on the evidence? I'm sure they will lose sleep over this ...
That 14th juror guy said the duct tape was not ON the skull, but NEAR it. 3 small pieces. They ASSUMED it had been on the skull because the mandible was still attached. The evidence just was not there. No evidence of how she died, and no evidence of who dumped her. No evidence.
I've never been able to understand why a Republican contributor is a 'fat cat' and a Democratic contributor of the same amount of money is a 'public-spirited philanthropist'.
I have to assume that the coroner checked the body for chlorine in her lungs.
they did do this, did they not?
Doubt can be introduced into even the most absurdly obvious facts of reality. Entire schools of philosophy developed techniques to intentionally, knowingly turn a strong argument on its head to elicit just that sort of doubt. We still have a large percentage of the population that is not ready to say evolution is evidenced to be real. I don't entertain the notion that most people can navigate all of that very well. If every jury is simply subject to "doubt", without reasoned discourse, they are doomed to make bad choices. It's been that way for thousands of years, don't let me fool you into thinking I believe it will change any time soon