• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans Say They’re Open to ‘Revenue Raisers’

He signs the bills from congress before the spending can happen

You're nto paying attention. No one says he didn't see a line saying money would go to a program. I'm saying he did not approve all the details of that program, and damn site many others. It doesn't work the way you're trying to pretend it does.
 
You're nto paying attention. No one says he didn't see a line saying money would go to a program. I'm saying he did not approve all the details of that program, and damn site many others. It doesn't work the way you're trying to pretend it does.

It does, he gets briefed by dept heads and should know what the Dept is doing. Your denial shows you have no defense for Obama. You are just proving Obama is not capable of doing the job he was elected for.
 
It does, he gets briefed by dept heads and should know what the Dept is doing. Your denial shows you have no defense for Obama. You are just proving Obama is not capable of doing the job he was elected for.

You have to prove he was brieft. That's the bottom line. You can't assume it. Can't just want it. You have to prove it.
 
You have to prove he was brieft. That's the bottom line. You can't assume it. Can't just want it. You have to prove it.

So now the President is not briefed and does not know what anny of his dept are doing. Once again you are saying Obama is not competent and has no business in the office of the president
 
So now the President is not briefed and does not know what anny of his dept are doing. Once again you are saying Obama is not competent and has no business in the office of the president

He does not get full briefings on every single program in the US. No. You have to prove he had the briefing.
 
He does not get full briefings on every single program in the US. No. You have to prove he had the briefing.

So something of this importance involving 3 departments he knows nothing about?
MG_119.gif
 
the idea that the dea and the fbi and the nea are selling forty thousand weapons to mexican drug cartels, and eric holder knows nothing of it, is laughable

on more than one level
 
So something of this importance involving 3 departments he knows nothing about?
MG_119.gif

Operational detail no. But by all means provide actual evidence if you can.
 
You have been shown evidence you will never admit anything that shows Obama for the criminal he is.

you're welcome to present your evidence of criminal activity by President Obama to the Senate, so they can begin impeachment proceedings.
 
you're welcome to present your evidence of criminal activity by President Obama to the Senate, so they can begin impeachment proceedings.

It is being investigated and the DOJ is trying to hide it
 
Operational detail no

concerning the SALE OF FORTY THOUSAND GUNS!

to MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS!

LOL!

umm, well, uhh, i knew, umm, about some SALES of some, uhh, number of GUNS down to, uhh, down to MEXICO...

but i really didn't, umm, get into any, uhh, of the OPERATIONAL DETAILS concerning said SALE of said GUNS to said, umm, CARTELS

i, uhh, i TRUST my people at A-T-F

which is why MELSON's gotta go

and, so far as the D-E-A and the F-B-I are concerned...

who needs OPERATIONAL DETAILS
 
You have been shown evidence you will never admit anything that shows Obama for the criminal he is.

Like I've said, you thinking you've shown evidence doesn't mean you have. Sorry. :coffeepap
 
Like I've said, you thinking you've shown evidence doesn't mean you have. Sorry. :coffeepap

I read his sentence that you're responding to THREE TIMES and it's still not in English!
 
I read his sentence that you're responding to THREE TIMES and it's still not in English!

He just needs to take a slow deep breath, inhale, exhale slowly, and I think he would then be able to smooth it out. Heck, I get to going too fast myself sometimes. ;)
 
Operational detail no. But by all means provide actual evidence if you can.

He don't have time for that,he,s still working on that birth certificate thingy.:roll:
 
ah...so its a Conspiracy!!!!!!

;)

well, bluntly, yes. the guy who was apparently designated to be the "fall guy" (temporary head of the ATF) has hired his own lawyer and seems ready to start pointing fingers.

for not the first time - the cover up will prove more scandalous than the actual crime.

Did Obama know? probably not. Nobody has oversight over all of our special access programs. You just have to pick people you trust.. and then trust them. But it's interesting to see people who four years ago were insisting that President Bush was personally behind some National Guards abusing their prisoners at Abu Ghraib now insisting that The President Doesn't Have Time For That Kind Of Thing.
 
Like I've said, you thinking you've shown evidence doesn't mean you have. Sorry. :coffeepap

You can deny it but you miss the point that Obama is trying to block the investigation. If it was bush you would be claiming he knew all about it but when it is your Messiah he must be defended
 
He just needs to take a slow deep breath, inhale, exhale slowly, and I think he would then be able to smooth it out. Heck, I get to going too fast myself sometimes. ;)

No you need to look at the links provided and see the truth that Obama and Holder are in this up to their necks.
 
you thinking you've shown evidence doesn't mean you have

holder's responsible either way

ESPECIALLY if he doesn't know the...

what were they, again?

oh, yeah

OPERATIONAL DETAILS

LOL!

ESPECIALLY if the ag does NOT know those op's, y'know, concerning the SALE OF FORTY THOUSAND GUNS TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS by almost every law enforcement agency in the dept...

we all know holder's dumb

but it's still to be determined---is he dumb ENOUGH?
 
No you need to look at the links provided and see the truth that Obama and Holder are in this up to their necks.

I've look at the links a couple of times, and you cannot reach that conclusion objectively. Sorry. :coffeepap
 
they're up to their eyeballs, whether they knew those operational details or not

their employees did it

forty thousand GUNS sold by the dea, fbi and atf to mexican drug cartels

no follow up, no surveillance

the white house tried to portray this as rather a rogue atf

but now it appears more a doj amok, don'tcha think

you gotta be pretty blind, mr attorney general...

forty thousand assault weapons sold with a handshake to folks who murder grammas and behead daddies and kidnap kids...

pretty blind
 
Back
Top Bottom