• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Amazon to California: Read My Lips, No Online Sales Tax(edited)

Misterveritis

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
2,233
Location
Huntsville, AL
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I love this one. Stick it to California and any other state that tries this:

Amazon sent an email Wednesday to California affiliates immediately severing ties with them -- and putting those businesses in the crosshairs.
"Unfortunately, Governor Brown has signed into law the bill that we emailed you about earlier today. As a result of this, contracts with all California residents participating in the Amazon Associates Program are terminated effective today, June 29, 2011," the company wrote in an email to affiliates obtained by FoxNews.com.


Read more: Amazon to California: Read My Lips, No Online Sales Tax - FoxNews.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

Ca has been "screwing" the pooch since Reagan left.

"Progressives" are abject morons.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

Amazon left Texas over pretty much the same thing.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

wow, I knew Kalifornia leads the states in deviancy but this is a new one:mrgreen:

Kalifornia loses how many millionaires a year?

The Legislature here in the Republik of Kalifornia are dumb as a bag of hammers.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties


They have the districts so Gerrymandered that in 2006, 183 seats in Sacramento were up for re-election, not a single seat changed the buttocks sitting in it. I still sit waiting patiently for the FEC to investigate so the people can be once again represented. WE AREN'T.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

They have the districts so Gerrymandered that in 2006, 183 seats in Sacramento were up for re-election, not a single seat changed the buttocks sitting in it. I still sit waiting patiently for the FEC to investigate so the people can be once again represented. WE AREN'T.
I left California six years ago. I get to keep more of the money I earn. I am far happier. Try leaving. It works.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

I left California six years ago. I get to keep more of the money I earn. I am far happier. Try leaving. It works.

Selling my house in this market wouldn't be a good thing for me.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

Selling my house in this market wouldn't be a good thing for me.

I feel your pain. As soon as I can do it, I'll close my business here and restart it in AZ or maybe TX.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

Then you must fight where you live.

I do more than you know. I haven't posted much here, but I work hard every day to push back the frontiers of Liberal Ingnorance. There are far more Conservatives in California then most people think. The last tax revolt happened when Jerry Brown was Governor, we may just have a de ja vu for old scary Jerry.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

LOL. I got a warning for this post. Imagine that. It seems there is a similar post somewhere here. Awesome.

And he changed my title. Does this frustrate anyone else?
 
Last edited:
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

Dude, don't say anything in the forum itself.

LOL. I got a warning for this post. Imagine that. It seems there is a similar post somewhere here. Awesome.

And he changed my title. Does this frustrate anyone else?
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

All this hullabaloo makes me wonder where all the people who favor replacing the income tax with various sales taxes are.

Personally, I think Amazon is doing the right thing. Sales tax is the devil.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

LOL. I got a warning for this post. Imagine that. It seems there is a similar post somewhere here. Awesome.

And he changed my title. Does this frustrate anyone else?

Moderator's Warning:
There is a sticky thread with the guidelines for posting in the Breaking News subforums. Failure to follow those guidelines is a rules infraction.

As is discussing moderation in threads. If you have an issue with the rules or the enforcement thereof, use the Contact Us form.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

I actually support the states being able to collect sales tax revenue from companies selling from the Internet. It represents an unfair advantage over local businesses who are required to force their customers to pay sales tax. Amazon knows that they become less competitive if they are forced to collect the same sales tax anyone else from the state is required to pay. While not every state has a sales tax, I would like to see EVERY state with a sales tax do this. It will help local businesses who hire local people.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

I actually support the states being able to collect sales tax revenue from companies selling from the Internet. It represents an unfair advantage over local businesses who are required to force their customers to pay sales tax. Amazon knows that they become less competitive if they are forced to collect the same sales tax anyone else from the state is required to pay. While not every state has a sales tax, I would like to see EVERY state with a sales tax do this. It will help local businesses who hire local people.



The business model has changed and the tax code is going to have to change.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

I actually support the states being able to collect sales tax revenue from companies selling from the Internet. It represents an unfair advantage over local businesses who are required to force their customers to pay sales tax. Amazon knows that they become less competitive if they are forced to collect the same sales tax anyone else from the state is required to pay. While not every state has a sales tax, I would like to see EVERY state with a sales tax do this. It will help local businesses who hire local people.

States aren't allowed to tax businesses that don't have a physical presence in their state.
The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

So basically California did a round robin type thing and counts the Affiliate program businesses and The Kindle lab as physical presence.
Which is not where the business is conducted from.

They're just trying to find cheap ways of extracting tax money.

Amazon is more efficient than a local business would be, in large part.
Not only that but it helps states by reducing traffic flow to shopping areas.
 
Last edited:
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

Good, Amazon is dead right and within their right not to sell to california.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

Ca has been "screwing" the pooch since Reagan left.

"Progressives" are abject morons.

This is not a Liberal or a Conservative issue. Rick Perry, Republican Governor and possible 2012 GOP presidential hopeful, did the same thing here in Texas, and Amazon pulled out here as well. As states begin to feel the financial squeeze brought about by the recession, they look for more ways to raise revenue. Some ways are good, and some ways are not so good. But this brings us to another point. As more states attempt to collect sales taxes the same way as Texas and California tried, is Amazon going to keep pulling out of state after state? Eventually, if enough states attempt to collect sales taxes, there will come a point at which Amazon's affiliate program begins to lose money. If it comes to that, it boils down to 2 ways to go:

1) Accept the sales taxes imposed by the states on it's affiliate programs.

OR

2) Fight this in court.

Since affiliate programs sell to consumers in one state, but are actually located elsewhere, it seems to me that the states in which consumers are located do not have the right to impose a tax on the product, since the product does not originate in that state. Therefore, I would choose option 2.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

As states begin to feel the financial squeeze brought about by the recession, they look for more ways to raise revenue. Some ways are good, and some ways are not so good. But this brings us to another point. As more states attempt to collect sales taxes the same way as Texas and California tried, is Amazon going to keep pulling out of state after state? Eventually, if enough states attempt to collect sales taxes, there will come a point at which Amazon's affiliate program begins to lose money. If it comes to that, it boils down to 2 ways to go:

1) Accept the sales taxes imposed by the states on it's affiliate programs.

OR

2) Fight this in court.

Since affiliate programs sell to consumers in one state, but are actually located elsewhere, it seems to me that the states in which consumers are located do not have the right to impose a tax on the product, since the product does not originate in that state. Therefore, I would choose option 2.
Option 3. Citizens get control of their governments. In the mean time I will step up my writing.
 
Re: California Screws the Pooch. Amazon cuts ties

I actually support the states being able to collect sales tax revenue from companies selling from the Internet. It represents an unfair advantage over local businesses who are required to force their customers to pay sales tax.

What is the justification to pay sales tax? Are they using any of the state services to produce and deliver their product? No. Why should they pay sales tax? If I sell to you over the internet and deliver by USPS, what state service have I benefited from? This is why the nexus issue has always stood. There has to be some tangible reason for collecting the tax. Without nexus, there should be no tax.

Amazon knows that they become less competitive if they are forced to collect the same sales tax anyone else from the state is required to pay. While not every state has a sales tax, I would like to see EVERY state with a sales tax do this. It will help local businesses who hire local people.

So you are basically just for enforcing an inter-custom unions tarriff even when there is no tangible economic business reason to tax them?
 
Back
Top Bottom