Loose Feather
Banned
- Joined
- May 9, 2011
- Messages
- 232
- Reaction score
- 7
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Methinks the judge has some latino ***** like schwarzenegger. He'll never give that up.
Methinks the judge has some latino ***** like schwarzenegger. He'll never give that up.
Sounds EXACTLY like ... the soviet union.
Clarify, Legal or illegals?
Where? In Blotto world?
Legal = In the country legally
Illegal = In the country illegally.
j-mac
Exactly. It's an important distinction. A legal immigrant is llike a guest in your house. An illegal is like someone who just snuck through the window.
Most of us would rather not having people sneaking into our houses through the windows.
Yet we read stories of "immigrants" that really are about illegals. It must infuriate the legal immigrants to be lumped in with the people who just snuck in. I know it would me if I were an immigrant.
Sounds EXACTLY like ... the soviet union.
Clarify, Legal or illegals?
Even places like Australia have laws on Americans moving there - you must be able to fit into their needed labor expectations.a rule on immigration that they must be able to support themselves if they come here
BESIDES ALL THAT:
Why should those who illegally enter our country be allowed the same PRIVILEGES as those who went through ALL the hassles of coming here LEGALLY.
Exactly. It's an important distinction. A legal immigrant is llike a guest in your house. An illegal is like someone who just snuck through the window.
Most of us would rather not having people sneaking into our houses through the windows.
Yet we read stories of "immigrants" that really are about illegals. It must infuriate the legal immigrants to be lumped in with the people who just snuck in. I know it would me if I were an immigrant.
Because the Democratic voting block needs support from this ethnic minority to stay in political office in both state and federal elections. The truth of it is, there are more legal minorities who will stick up for their former countrymen who are here illegally to stay, than not. Therefore, the political party that throws in behind the illegals in support of some type of program or amnesty will gain votes from said minority. A secondary effect is those unskilled illegals become a proxy slave class doing the hard labor work others do not want to do.
Can't speak of the USSR but the USSR military that was in Communist Hungary were positioned there for defense and labor (as in building thing - maybe like border containment)
like krickitt said
Even places like Australia have laws on Americans moving there - you must be able to fit into their needed labor expectations.
Why should those who illegally enter our country be allowed the same PRIVILEGES as those who went through ALL the hassles of coming here LEGALLY.
disrespect and it's time to regain respect as it was years ago
The issue isn't comparable. I was talking more about the hospital turning you into the cops... which would lead to a humanitarian disaster. Sometimes people like to sound hardcore and possibly purposefully forget that as humans even illegals have some rights.
The situation is hardly comparable, were the richest nation on earth with a massive border to a huge population in third world conditions.
Once again another one that thinks they break the law for fun or a thrill or out of a lack of domestication. They cant afford or manage the legal route. Something tells me that may be hard for a person who can afford something other than a dirt floor.
Like when they lived here and then we made racist drug laws and deported them?
The issue isn't comparable. I was talking more about the hospital turning you into the cops... which would lead to a humanitarian disaster. Sometimes people like to sound hardcore and possibly purposefully forget that as humans even illegals have some rights.
The situation is hardly comparable, were the richest nation on earth with a massive border to a huge population in third world conditions.
Once again another one that thinks they break the law for fun or a thrill or out of a lack of domestication. They cant afford or manage the legal route. Something tells me that may be hard for a person who can afford something other than a dirt floor.
Like when they lived here and then we made racist drug laws and deported them?
I think everyone has known that - BUT what about the reason the legal non Hispanic left is allowing this invasion to continue?Because the Democratic voting block needs support from this ethnic minority to stay in political office in both state and federal elections. The truth of it is, there are more legal minorities who will stick up for their former countrymen who are here illegally to stay, than not. Therefore, the political party that throws in behind the illegals in support of some type of program or amnesty will gain votes from said minority.
A secondary effect is those unskilled illegals become a proxy slave class doing the hard labor work others do not want to do.
I'm really curious to see if Republicans do any better. The border has been unsecured for at least thirty years under both Democrats and Republicans. I used to think it was because Republicans were giving their supporters cheap labor and Democrats were building their base.
I now believe the border is unsecured because the world banking cartel is getting us ready to more seamlessly blend into the new world order. They think they've dumbed enough of us down and now they need to dilute the independent minded population with more tractable and obedient inhabitants.
Well the boarder w/ Mexico is so huge and so long, unless you got a standing army of a few million men lined up and stay there for 24hrs/day, it's not going to be secure, ever. No country not US or Mexico will spent that much man power to secure the border that way. It's undoable. Besides the steady need for job drives the Mexicans across the boarder. The steady need for drugs in US also drives the cartel to cross the boarder. I think if these two factors are out then there won't be anymore impetus to cross the border. But these are extremely powerful forces - drugs and jobs, who can stop it? how? is this even possible?
Why not make the fat, lazy Americans get off the couch and do the jobs or lose the benefits they get by saying they can't find a job? Send out a form letter--"There are X# of jobs in your area that you qualify for. Please apply within 30 days or present to this office a DR's excuse why you are unable to work. Congratulations on your new job!!"
Not to be argumentative, but I drove a cab here in Tucson for almost 11 years. We had gov't medical contracts with medicaid providers. I would pick people up on cash, take them to drop their kids off at free day care, then take them on welfare (free) to their free MD appts, then to get their free prescriptions, take them home as required by welfare transportation contract, then we would switch back to cash and go buy beer, drugs, food stamp groceries.... this is no lie, and if you are unaware of this good for you. You live in a kinder, more fair world than the one cab drivers live in every single day.
LOTS of people are on welfare in rural areas. Some live there intentionally to qualify for welfare. I'm not lying. I have had $300 trips out in the desert to drive people to and from MD appts. They tell me this stuff, I don't make it up. LOTS of them have CARS, but they LIE about that to get transportation.. We are being taken to the cleaners. You know, of course, that the illegal's kids also qualify for welfare, so we are being bombed on all sides.
I stand by my idea. If people can PROVE a reason they can't do these jobs-- let them. It is my opinion that if able bodied people do not work by choice they should not be paid.
THAT is slavery, my friend. Subjugating people to gov't care rather than providing a way for them to stand alone.
Another thing. One of my young daughter's good girlfriends just got a job on a ranch. She takes care of animals, and it is hard work. The female rancher will NOT hire illegals. She pays these kids $10 an hour and they love their jobs. THAT is the way it should be, IMO.
eace
Therein lies the problem. We have made it more profitable for people not to work than to work, after you add up the value of all their benefits. Gov't slavery..
Gov't dependence is slavery. HOW?? Someone offers you a management position... but you could lose your free day care and food stamps if you take the job. You reject the offer, and resign yourself to a life of minimum wage at McDonalds instead of toughing it out for a few years and making management and a GOOD wage with benefits. It is a mind set, and is generational now. People KNOW not to shoot for the best they can do.. or else. Gov't will abandon them.. slavery.
I went from being a stay at home Mom of five to a single mother with no child support for several years. I was not RAISED to depend on gov't, so I did it on my own. I drove a CAB, most dangerous job there is aside from cop and fire, but I NEVER asked the gov't to feed, house, or provide day care for my kids. I wasn't RAISED that way. It was very hard, but I used no one else's money to do it. You and I are going to have to agree to disagree on this. I have little sympathy for people that choose not to work because it would be HARD on them. SOME people CAN'T work, SOME people choose not to work.
I posted an article on a different board a few months ago that said they pay $100 a day to illegals to pick onions in Georgia, were worried because they pay more to legals. Sorry, but $100 a day in this economy is not bad. Better than driving a cab for the same.
Aside from welfare-- I bet there ARE people that would do that work rather than be a gov't case. LOTS of them. The argument is that there aren't. I don't believe that. It is a pro-illegal immigration POV, and that is all.