Marilyn Monroe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2006
- Messages
- 2,137
- Reaction score
- 304
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You mean the "blood evidence" with the preservative in it, that LAPD smeared on evidence without realizing that the preservative in the blood would show that OJ was not the person who put it there?
Don't get me wrong....OJ was guilty....but the Simpson case is a classic example of police action at its worst and what can happen as a result. OJ wasn't acquitted because of fears of a riot....he was acquitted because the LAPD created reasonable doubt.
What makes you think he was guilty? He had people's blood in areas it shouldn't have been, and who said all the blood was tainted? Maybe some of the policework was shoddy, but some of it was probably fine. I don't know if preservative will change the results of the testing. I read where some of the blood had been kept out for over 4 hrs in some detective's car or something.
O'Reilly said the jurors told him they did not want to convict a black man. What would be the reason? I still think that there was a fear of violence as the country was very torn along racial lines over this particular case.