- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,075
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I don't see how I can break this down any simpler than I already have, but let me try again to explain:
Congress issues the Pledge of Allegiance in the United States Code (i.e. the wording of the Pledge is a matter of law).
There is only one official Pledge of Allegiance at any given time.
Something that does not conform with the Pledge as written in the contemporary USC is not the Pledge.
Deleting portions of the Pledge that one finds disagreeable means that the words are no longer the genuine Pledge.
Yep I get all that I still find no logic to make one "offended" over them doing it to be more PC, IF thats what they were doing.
I believe in god, I believe in this country, skipping those words in a brodcast to be more PC doesnt "offened" me.
I think its dumb
but I dont see being offended justified because of anything you said. Im not saying I disagree with the basics of what you said I trying to see the logical tie to being offended.
Cant see one that is relevant. My emotion isnt wired in so tight with my logic that it can take it over, 99% of the time logic wins. :shrug:
It was more dumb to apologize for it, they basically apologized for doing what they thought was right and PC.
So I guess you'll just have to agree to disagree.
Last edited: