Biologically, you are not. However, politically, you feel so fanatical to fall into the trap of someone else’s insect control plot.
Wow, what an imagination you have. You are comparing things that have nothing to do with each other. And you fail to actually address the points being made at all.
A refuge that homosexual thinks impeccable to fend off their criticizer is “Homosexual is not about sex, it is about love”. Why are you so happy to point out their betrayal nature? A homosexual having sex with other sex can only be conducted under the betrayal mentality.
First of all, you are the one insisting that homosexuality is about sex. That makes you somewhat obsessive about other people's sex life. Are you going to argue that same sex couples cannot love each other? Are you going to try to argue that they do none of the same things that opposite sex couples do? Are you going to argue that the only time they spend together has to involve sexual activity of some kind?
Second, nature isn't being subverted or ignored at all here. Sex has a natural purpose in primates of socialization. Ignoring this discounts almost all the sexual activity that humans are ever involved in as being unnatural, whether it takes place between opposite sex pairs or same sex pairs, since 99% of sexual activity is for personal pleasure not reproduction.
Be honest and brave to face the reality: one of the reasons that someone takes a homosexual life is to escape baby rearing. True, some of you create the “right” to rob someone else’s baby for adoption in order to cover up their barren nature, but this is based on that some other group of people have created the babies. What has been barren stays barren.
I know what reality is. We have the technology to make babies when natural sexual relations fail to do so. Plus, we have many children, in this country alone who need loving homes with parents willing and able to raise them, including same sex parents. There is nothing that says that only opposite sex couples should be allowed to adopt children.
Plus, being barren would apply to many opposite sex couples, particularly those using adoption, surrogacy, sperm/egg donations, or IVF to get children to raise the same as it does same sex couples.
And yet again you fail to address the argument from the standpoint you made. You said that if everyone was homosexual, the humans, or at least those races that went completely homosexual, would die out. You were proven wrong and then came up with some crap about how they shouldn't be allowed to do that. Well, it doesn't matter if you believe they shouldn't be allowed to do it. They are. And if everyone were homosexual, they certainly would still be able to make babies, whether you think it is wrong or not.