Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 68 of 68

Thread: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

  1. #61
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    07-07-12 @ 04:13 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    486

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by tecoyah View Post
    Husband is a male term...and thus deems a Penis by definition. Wife is a female term, and this a vagina.

    So....we come up with the terms...Partner, significant other, or in some cases....husband to a male, or wife to a female.

    It may not be preschool ( I hope not)...but it IS common sense and logical thought...try it, it's refreshing.
    If you are talking about artificial organ transplant, yes, it may even include brain. Do you need one to be so transplanted?

  2. #62
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    07-07-12 @ 04:13 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    486

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Omgitsme View Post
    What the **** are you talking about? She is female. Therefor she doesnt have a penis. It doesnt matter if she has a wife or a husband she is still female.
    Ummm, young lady, don’t lose manner with me. It is you who put up the definition of husband. The counter part of a wife is naturally husband, who, according to you:
    Quote Originally Posted by Omgitsme View Post
    Ummm husbands always have penises.
    Now, you want to tell me a new gender is found among human beings: a female with penis, which is typically found on Ellen DeGeneres? I wonder if you have also found her possessing vagina or not.

  3. #63
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Illinois
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    3,335
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by crebigsol View Post
    Ummm, young lady, don’t lose manner with me. It is you who put up the definition of husband. The counter part of a wife is naturally husband, who, according to you:

    Now, you want to tell me a new gender is found among human beings: a female with penis, which is typically found on Ellen DeGeneres? I wonder if you have also found her possessing vagina or not.
    Oh god im done here.

  4. #64
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    07-07-12 @ 04:13 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    486

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Omgitsme View Post
    Oh god im done here.
    It is OK, I have nothing against you. Indeed, I feel you being on my side to help to straighten some difinition with other people in this thread. Thanks.

  5. #65
    Global Moderator
    The Truth is out there.
    Kal'Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry ID USA
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,857
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by crebigsol View Post
    30 years ago, you had no right to tell anyone not to smoke in a restaurant. 30 years later today, you have such right in nearly all American restaurants. Is this right inherited? Why were you not allowed to inherited the same right 30 years ago if such right must only be inherited?
    Actually the owner did have that right. And I believe that they should still have that right. (I'm against banning owners of restraunts to dictate if their establishment is smoking or not) The fact that it has been surpressed by mob mentality doesn't mean that its not there though. Anything can be surpressed but still exist.

    Also I think you have the words "inherant" and "inherited" confused. "Inherited" is something that is passed down from one person to another. "Inherant" is something that has always been or is a part of something else. EX: DNA is a part of a human being.

    Quote Originally Posted by crebigsol View Post
    Yes, I understand that. On this I cannot put up argument with you. America is in a very confusing state as far as ideology is concerned. Many self-claimed conservatives just advocate and escort full scale the program that guarantees rearing bastards with public money; while such bastards can only demand socialist agenda when they grow up. However, at this point, I have not yet seen you put up any point that is close to what I think conservative. In San Francisco, there is such a law: If a person, regardless of the actual gender you may conceive "she" possesses, wearing makeup as a woman but you, as a government worker, failed to address “her” with “proper” gender pronoun, such as ms, mam, young lady… you are fired on the base of discrimination. Getting used to the SF atmosphere for too long, I can only judge you with what you have portrayed yourself, but not with the part you have not exposed to me.
    Then perhaps before asigning a label to someone you should get to know them first?

    Quote Originally Posted by crebigsol View Post
    Yes, you can put up your explanation, but your words have been out, cannot be taken back.
    If I ever decide to take back my words then I will generally apologize for those words. But in this case I'm not trying to take back any of my words. I stand by them.
    I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang

    My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang

  6. #66
    Gone

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    10-16-16 @ 03:15 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    8,585

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by crebigsol View Post
    If you are talking about artificial organ transplant, yes, it may even include brain. Do you need one to be so transplanted?
    Obviously, as you not only failed to reply coherently to my post, but somehow managed to post such gibberish as to confuse everyone...you have absolutely nothing to offer on a debate board, probably should not be here.

    And as of now, for me at least...you are not.


    Ignore

  7. #67
    Global Moderator
    The Truth is out there.
    Kal'Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry ID USA
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,857
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by crebigsol View Post
    It has been apparent that what I told you will not be accepted by you. Why do you give you such a difficult task? May be it is more proper for me to ask you: if it has no penis is it a man or woman? I am sure you will accept an answer from Ellen DeGeeneres.
    Actually this isn't technically correct. I know its quibbleing but a person could be a eunuch or could be a female/male plant.

    Semantical arguement I know, but there it is.
    I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang

    My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang

  8. #68
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    07-07-12 @ 04:13 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    486

    Re: UN body votes for protection of gay rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Kal'Stang View Post
    Actually the owner did have that right. And I believe that they should still have that right. (I'm against banning owners of restraunts to dictate if their establishment is smoking or not) The fact that it has been surpressed by mob mentality doesn't mean that its not there though. Anything can be surpressed but still exist.
    I am talking about YOUR right, not the restaurant owner’s right. If a right is suppressed, it is not there anymore. In a lawsuit, if you lose, the winning party can have a right to ask compensation from you. If you later appeal and win, his right is suppressed, no more, it is gone! Don’t be stupid to continue to pay what you don’t need to.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kal'Stang View Post
    Also I think you have the words "inherant" and "inherited" confused. "Inherited" is something that is passed down from one person to another. "Inherant" is something that has always been or is a part of something else. EX: DNA is a part of a human being.
    I found no word as inherant in the dictionary. I took it as a typo. Since you repeated it several times, I consider replacing it with inherit. If you mean inherent, the right is even more remote from a possibility of existence if there is not a force to guarantee its existence. A fly, coded by the gene from its ancestors, has an inherent desire to share the food on your plate; do you consider it as an inherent right of the fly? Go back to the law suit case mentioned above, which party has the right that can be considered inherent?
    Quote Originally Posted by Kal'Stang View Post
    Then perhaps before asigning a label to someone you should get to know them first?
    Oh, that person already assigned a label to him/herself with words, actions… except the part she/he feels the need to conceal. If everybody does not judge the value of someone else by what he/she exposes, or judge by what is not exposed, no society can even reasonably exist.

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •