• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senate Page is fired for anti-Harper protest

Arcana XV said:
Who gives a flying **** what the majority think? I don't know about you, but I generally stand by my convictions no matter how many people may disagree with me. For instance: no matter how many people keep telling me that gay marriage is wrong, no matter how many people keep voting against it, I'm gonna keep telling them they're full of it. :shrug:
Click to expand...

But because you can say they are full of it... they can then respond in kind?
 
Arcana XV said:
Who gives a flying **** what the majority think? I don't know about you, but I generally stand by my convictions no matter how many people may disagree with me. For instance: no matter how many people keep telling me that gay marriage is wrong, no matter how many people keep voting against it, I'm gonna keep telling them they're full of it. :shrug:
Click to expand...

Apparently the government gave a flying **** because they fired her, and rightly so. Perhaps the next time she has something to say she can pick another venue, and a more articulate message..

"Stop Harper"???

It means nothing whatsoever. I agree that stupid people have a right to their opinions but intelligent people have the right of response, and they responded.

If she was to support Gay marriage (which is legal in Canada by the way) then she would have had message. But what part of 'Stop Harper' can anyone agree with. She is an obvious dunce.
 
Arcana XV said:
Sure. Why the hell not? It goes round and round and eventually one side wins. And my side is eventually gonna win this one. :D
Click to expand...

What is your side here? Stop Harper?

Stop Harper where? How? When ? Why? For what reason? What are you supporting here or protesting against?
 
Grant said:
What is your side here? Stop Harper?

Stop Harper where? How? When ? Why? For what reason? What are you supporting here or protesting against?
Click to expand...

You need to chill. I was telling Wake that the pro gay-marriage side will eventually win. Jeezus. What did they put in your coffee today?
 
Arcana XV said:
You need to chill. I was telling Wake that the pro gay-marriage side will eventually win. Jeezus. What did they put in your coffee today?
Click to expand...

My apologies. I didn't realize the conversation had moved on from empty pages in Canada to Gay marriage in general.

I am chilling as I type this.
 
Arcana XV said:
Sure. Why the hell not? It goes round and round and eventually one side wins. And my side is eventually gonna win this one. :D
Click to expand...

You may say that.

Sides don't "win".

Life isn't a game.
 
Grant said:
Apparently the government gave a flying **** because they fired her, and rightly so. Perhaps the next time she has something to say she can pick another venue, and a more articulate message..

"Stop Harper"???

It means nothing whatsoever. I agree that stupid people have a right to their opinions but intelligent people have the right of response, and they responded.

If she was to support Gay marriage (which is legal in Canada by the way) then she would have had message. But what part of 'Stop Harper' can anyone agree with. She is an obvious dunce.
Click to expand...

A lot o people here don't like Harper. I was a huge surprise to me and others he got a majority.
 
Juiposa said:
A lot o people here don't like Harper. I was a huge surprise to me and others he got a majority.
Click to expand...

Quebec was more of a surprise.

But there was little alternative to Harper. I think he's done a very good job.
 
Last edited:
Grant said:
I just re-read my post and cannot see where I claimed she was fired for her "specific politics".

Do you have a direct quote of mine saying I did?
Click to expand...

You said...
Grant said:
There are people with convictions. That's why she was fired.
Click to expand...

which I took to be referring to her political convictions. If I was in error, my apologies.
 
Grant said:
Quebec was more of a surprise.

But there was little alternative to Harper. I think he's done a very good job.
Click to expand...

The Bloc lost so many seats because they told their supporters to vote NDP. And Harper is an ass, he is striving to repeal the gun control and and scrap social health care, something that none of us want to see. I will protest if either of these happen!
 
Grant said:
Quebec was more of a surprise.

But there was little alternative to Harper. I think he's done a very good job.
Click to expand...

Liberal party i n Québec is mad at federal party because of last election. they call a meeting want to have interm leader. Marc Garneau say he will run for this but if Bob Rae dont run. i will like to see Marc Garneau as leader. :cool:
 
Juiposa said:
The Bloc lost so many seats because they told their supporters to vote NDP. And Harper is an ass, he is striving to repeal the gun control and and scrap social health care, something that none of us want to see. I will protest if either of these happen!
Click to expand...

Would you mind posting support for your claim that the PM is trying to repeal gun control and scrap social health care?
 
Carls said:
Liberal party i n Québec is mad at federal party because of last election. they call a meeting want to have interm leader. Marc Garneau say he will run for this but if Bob Rae dont run. i will like to see Marc Garneau as leader. :cool:
Click to expand...

The Liberal Party didn't have an attractive platform, nor leader, and the NDP cannot be taken seriously.

Why would anyone vote for the opportunistic Bob Rae as a Liberal when he almost destroyed Ontario as leader of the NDP?
 
Grant said:
The Liberal Party didn't have an attractive platform, nor leader, and the NDP cannot be taken seriously.

Why would anyone vote for the opportunistic Bob Rae as a Liberal when he almost destroyed Ontario as leader of the NDP?
Click to expand...


Are you Canadian, sir?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom