• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Education Department Rules on For-Profit Schools Created With Investor's Help

Whovian

Banned
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
7,153
Reaction score
2,250
Location
dimensionally transcendental
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Education Department Rules on For-Profit Schools Created With Investor's Help

A proposed regulation from the Education Department threatens to devastate for-profit career or trade schools, but one thing is even more controversial than the regulation -- how it was crafted.

Education Department officials were encouraged and advised about the content of the regulation by a man who stood to make millions if it were issued.

"Wall Street investors were manipulating the regulatory process and Department of Education officials were letting them," charged Melanie Sloan of a liberal-leaning ethics watchdog called Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

But a former Clinton official said if the shoe were on the other foot, Democrats would have a fit, and for good reason. "If it was a Republican administration that were doing this, the Democrats would be on the floor of the Congress in the House and Senate screaming bloody outrage."
 
If true, sorry to hear that. This type of thing has always been a problem. I would support efforts to prevent this type of thing.
 
As a rule of thumb, whenever "investors" are making money by betting that companies fail there is something unspeakably wrong with the system.

I wouldn't have a problem with this if the man doing the "advising" were profiting from the regulations because they helped his holdings succeed.
 
As a rule of thumb, whenever "investors" are making money by betting that companies fail there is something unspeakably wrong with the system.

I wouldn't have a problem with this if the man doing the "advising" were profiting from the regulations because they helped his holdings succeed.

That would make a difference. I'd still pause, but I wouldn't be as disturbed.
 
Back
Top Bottom