• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DP Book Club.

1069

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
24,975
Reaction score
5,126
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Sign up here if you plan to participate in the Book Club.
I'm gonna say, tentatively, that we'll have maybe two weeks to obtain and read the agreed-upon book?
A month seems excessively long to me; some of us may lose interest in that amount of time, or we may finish the book in two days and forget the details by the time it's time to discuss it.
A week, on the other hand, seems too short. Some of us may not ever be able to get the book in question until payday.
Would a month be better? I welcome your input. I don't know how long it takes some people to read books. i know we all have jobs, so... let me know what you think.

I think book selections can be fiction or nonfiction (there are, for example, some memoirs I'd like to include, eventually). Classic or contemporary.
I personally like a lot of books that came out in the 80s and 90s; I haven't read many new books that have impressed me since the century changed.
Another important thing is that we must choose books that are not too girly, nor too boy-y.
Otherwise, not many people will be interested in participating, and we won't get the diversity of perspectives we're looking for when it comes time to discuss the book.
Last, people who have already read the book are free to participate in the discussion, but must re-read the book in order to do so. Having read it two years ago doesn't count. You have to read it again.

So, I'd welcome any responses to the above guidelines, as well as suggestions on which books we should read. Once we've compiled some suggestions, we can make sort of a reading list. Maybe we can decide upon two months worth of books (which would be four, if we're doing a book every two weeks), and set dates for the discussions.
After the two months, we can re-assess the book club and see if it's fun, if participation is reasonably high, and if we wish to continue it or not.

Here's a few suggestions I have (although I also suggest that we not use more than one of any one person's suggestions, so others will get a chance to share books they like as well). These are not necessarily my all-time favorite books (which tend to be pretty girly), but they're good, solid, well-written books that I believe would appeal to a broader audience, and which are popular enough that nobody should have any trouble obtaining a copy.

1. The World According to Garp, by John Irving, 1978.
Fiction novel.

2. The Devil in the White City, by Erick Larson, 2003
Non-fiction account of the 1893 Chicago World Fair

3. The Mosquito Coast, Paul Theroux, 1982
Fiction novel.

4. Sophie's Choice, William Styron, 1979
Fiction

5. Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov, 1955
Fiction.

6. Little, Big, John Crowley, 1981
Fiction/ Fantasy. Winner of the World Fantasy Award, 1982.

I can think of a few others, but I think any of these would be thought-provoking, interesting to a broad readership, and spark off some interesting discussion.

I welcome other suggestions.
 
Last edited:
Sign up here if you plan to participate in the Book Club.
I'm gonna say, tentatively, that we'll have maybe two weeks to obtain and read the agreed-upon book? A month seems excessively long to me; some of us may lose interest in that amount of time, or we may finish the book in two days and forget the details by the time it's time to discuss it. A week, on the other hand, seems too short. Some of us may not ever be able to get the book in question until payday.
I think book selections can be fiction or nonfiction (there are, for example, some memoirs I'd like to include, eventually). Classic or contemporary. I personally like a lot of books that came out in the 80s and 90s; I haven't read many new books that have impressed me since about the century changed.
Another important this is that we must choose books that are not too girly, nor too boy-y.
Otherwise, not many people will be interested in participating, and we won't get the diversity of perspectives we're looking for when it comes time to discuss the book.
Last, people who have already read the book are free to participate in the discussion, but must re-read the book in order to do so. Having read it two years ago doesn't count. You have to read it again.

So, I'd welcome any responses to the above guidelines, as well as suggestions on which books we should read. Once we've compiled a list, we can make sort of a reading list. Maybe we can decide upon two months worth of books (which would be four), and set a date for the discussions.
After the two months, we can reassess the book club and see if it's fun, if participation is reasonably high, and if we wish to continue it or not.

Here's a few suggestions I have (although I also suggest that we not use more than one of any one person's suggestions, so others will get a chance to share books they like as well). These are not necessarily my all-time favorite books (which tend to be pretty girly), but they're good, solid, well-written books that I believe would appeal to a broader audience, and which are popular enough that nobody should have any trouble obtaining a copy.

1. The World According to Garp, by John Irving, 1978.
Fiction novel.

2. The Devil in the White City, by Erick Larson, 2003
Non-fiction account of the 1893 Chicago World Fair

3. The Mosquito Coast, Paul Theroux, 1982
Fiction novel.

4. Sophie's Choice, William Styron, 1979
Fiction

5. Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov, 1955
Fiction.


I can think of a few others, but I think any of these would be thought-provoking, interesting to a broad readership, and spark off some interesting discussion.

I welcome other suggestions.

I'm aboard. I say Garp because I told you I'd read it and I haven't yet--and it looks interesting as well as funny and disturbing. (My favorite things in literature!)

Oh...and Lolita is way over-rated.;)
 
I'm aboard. I say Garp because I told you I'd read it and I haven't yet--and it looks interesting as well as funny and disturbing. (My favorite things in literature!)

Oh...and Lolita is way over-rated.;)

I've edited the OP so a couple of things make a little more sense, and added one more book to my suggestions.
I'll admit I put Garp at the top of the list because I'm hoping that's one that will be chosen, if not now then sometime.
 
I've edited the OP so a couple of things make a little more sense, and added one more book to my suggestions.
I'll admit I put Garp at the top of the list because I'm hoping that's one that will be chosen, if not now then sometime.

Is Little, Big Sci Fi or Fantasy? I generally don't like fantasy, but love sci-fi and sometimes people use the genre interchangeably.
 
Is Little, Big Sci Fi or Fantasy? I generally don't like fantasy, but love sci-fi and sometimes people use the genre interchangeably.

It won the World Fantasy Award the first year it was published, but it's really not either.
It's more like... an historical novel, almost.
It's the story of several generations of a very eccentric, affluent, rural New England family, from their arrival from England to the present day.
Part of what's eccentric about the family is that they believe- at least some of them believe- that faeries are real, and that they can consort with them to some extent (and when I say "faeries", I'm not talking about the modern-day, cutesy type; these faeries are kind of malicious).

It's told from the perspective of a level-headed young man who marries into this bizarre family, and goes to live with them.
Of course, at the end it turns out that the faeries actually are real, and that they've been controlling everyone's destiny all along, but you don't know this for sure until the very end of the book. Throughout most of it, it's kind of ambiguous; it seems possible that maybe they're all just crazy.
And it's a really long book.

It's an interesting read. I've never liked any sci-fi or 'fantasy", except this one. It's kind of a cross-over, I guess, for people who don't ordinarily like fantasy. Because it's not very "fantastic". It's pretty realistic, right up until the very end.
It's a superbly well-written piece of fiction.
 
Last edited:
I really like this idea. I'm down.

I would suggest since it is the Debate Politics Book Club, perhaps we read books with political insinuations? Not political thriller type books, but like 1984, one of Obama's books (or memoirs of a past president), or books dealing with political subjects?
 
I'm in, of course. I'm cool with any of the books mentioned, but I would have to feign excitement about The World According to Garp or Tuesdays With Morrie. One book I'd really like to read that just popped in my head is 100 Years of Solitude, if anyone is interested.
 
I really like this idea. I'm down.

I would suggest since it is the Debate Politics Book Club, perhaps we read books with political insinuations? Not political thriller type books, but like 1984, one of Obama's books (or memoirs of a past president), or books dealing with political subjects?

I almost suggested Dreams from my Father, but I figured that might be too alienating.
If we did that sort of thing, we'd have to alternate: one liberal book, one conservative.
I dunno how down people would be with it.

I guess we could read some near-future dystopia books: 1984, Brave New World, Virtual Light, This Perfect Day, Random Acts of Senseless Violence.

Hey, could we read Clockwork Orange, while we're at it?

:lol:
 
I'd be happy to read any politics book, liberal or conservative. I bet most of us have read a majority of the classic dystopian works, though.

Never read A Clockwork Orange, that would be cool.
 
I'm in, of course. I'm cool with any of the books mentioned, but I would have to feign excitement about The World According to Garp or Tuesdays With Morrie. One book I'd really like to read that just popped in my head is 100 Years of Solitude, if anyone is interested.

Gabriel García Márquez. Righteous.
That works for me.
 
I almost suggested Dreams from my Father, but I figured that might be too alienating.
If we did that sort of thing, we'd have to alternate: one liberal book, one conservative.
I dunno how down people would be with it.

I guess we could read some near-future dystopia books: 1984, Brave New World, Virtual Light, This Perfect Day, Random Acts of Senseless Violence.

Hey, could we read Clockwork Orange, while we're at it?

:lol:

I love the dystopia idea. I've been wanting to read Clockwork Orange and Brave New World for a while now. Dreams from my Father would be good too.

I'm loving this idea, 10. Right now the only things I read are text books and fantasy/scifi. I haven't read any real books since I finished Snuff last summer.

And I'd also suggest putting up a poll once we've got enough people interested.
 
I’d be down! Hell when I eat breakfast I read the cereal box out of habit! GREAT idea 10!
 
Count me in, I'm luvin this idea!


The only thing I ask is maybe we could pick two books for each month then do the first one the first two weeks and the other the last two. I just can't afford to buy two new books a month so I will need to get them from the library and it's better to know in advance a little to be able to find where they are available and more convenient to go once a month instead of two. I would really appreciate that. :)
 
I'm in, but I would like to make a few recomendations as well.

1. We don't put the book that month up to a vote. We chose members at random and they simply inform everyone who has signed up via PM of what the book is that month. This means that there can be a more varied selection of books, and people will have to expand their reading choices for the purposes of the club.

2. 10 would start us off since this is her baby. She should simply pick one of her suggestions and make it the book that we all have to read that month.

3. We should have limits to the times the same author or genre is repeated, especially consecutively. If we have a dystopia book recommended by RightOfCenter one month, I cannot recommend anotehr dystopia book three months down the line, no matter how much I love dystopia books. I would be in favor of a limit of only one book per author a year, and at least six months between genre repeats. The genre may fall into multiple categories, but we'll know the one that best fits. 1984 is both sci-fi and dystopia, but I think that it should not exclude another sci-fi book such as The Man in the High Castle since one is dystopia, the other is alternate reality/history book.

So, in my opinion, 1984 would exclude Brave New World for 6 months and The Man in the High Castle would exclude pretty much anything by Harry Turtledove for 6 months.

4. The ability to select a book will be dependent on participation with other's books. If someone signs up, but doesn't participate with other people's recomendations, they cannot share their own books in the club.

Overall, I love the idea though. I really need to branch out from my typical humor/sci-fi personal selections.
 
I'm in, but I would like to make a few recomendations as well.

1. We don't put the book that month up to a vote. We chose members at random and they simply inform everyone who has signed up via PM of what the book is that month. This means that there can be a more varied selection of books, and people will have to expand their reading choices for the purposes of the club.

2. 10 would start us off since this is her baby. She should simply pick one of her suggestions and make it the book that we all have to read that month.

3. We should have limits to the times the same author or genre is repeated, especially consecutively. If we have a dystopia book recommended by RightOfCenter one month, I cannot recommend anotehr dystopia book three months down the line, no matter how much I love dystopia books. I would be in favor of a limit of only one book per author a year, and at least six months between genre repeats. The genre may fall into multiple categories, but we'll know the one that best fits. 1984 is both sci-fi and dystopia, but I think that it should not exclude another sci-fi book such as The Man in the High Castle since one is dystopia, the other is alternate reality/history book.

So, in my opinion, 1984 would exclude Brave New World for 6 months and The Man in the High Castle would exclude pretty much anything by Harry Turtledove for 6 months.

4. The ability to select a book will be dependent on participation with other's books. If someone signs up, but doesn't participate with other people's recomendations, they cannot share their own books in the club.

Overall, I love the idea though. I really need to branch out from my typical humor/sci-fi personal selections.

I don't think there should be restraints against a person when it comes time to share his or her book with the club.
 
I don't think there should be restraints against a person when it comes time to share his or her book with the club.

I'm thinking of it more as restraints on the book, not restraints on the person. Except for 4, which I just think of as fair to those who are participating fairly regularly.

But I can see your point.
 
I'm thinking of it more as restraints on the book, not restraints on the person. Except for 4, which I just think of as fair to those who are participating fairly regularly.

But I can see your point.

Well if you are restraining their choice of books based on previous choices, it's really not fair to them.
 
I'm in, please.
 
1. The World According to Garp, by John Irving, 1978.
Fiction novel.

2. The Devil in the White City, by Erick Larson, 2003
Non-fiction account of the 1893 Chicago World Fair

3. The Mosquito Coast, Paul Theroux, 1982
Fiction novel.

4. Sophie's Choice, William Styron, 1979
Fiction

5. Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov, 1955
Fiction.

6. Little, Big, John Crowley, 1981
Fiction/ Fantasy. Winner of the World Fantasy Award, 1982.

I can think of a few others, but I think any of these would be thought-provoking, interesting to a broad readership, and spark off some interesting discussion.

I welcome other suggestions.

I'd be interested in 1-3 and 6. Lolita & Sophie's Choice I've read long ago and have no interest in reading either again.
 
Well, since somebody said they didn't want to read Garp... at least one person has expressed reservations about every book on my list, except Devil in the White City (nonfiction) and Mosquito Coast (fiction).

All else being equal, I think we should start with fiction; it's just easier.
So I guess the first book can be The Mosquito Coast, by Paul Theroux, if it's up to me to pick the first one. As long as that's agreeable to everyone; if it's not, speak up, and I'll throw out some other suggestions.
I hope everyone can find it; it was a bestseller, but it's nearly 30 years old. Libraries have it (at least the one here does). If anyone thinks they might have trouble finding it, let me know and we can read something else.

And there was a request that we choose the first month's books simultaneously, so who wants to pick the next one?
 
Back
Top Bottom