• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Are You Reading Right Now?

I LOVED Exit to Eden.

And the Sleeping Beauty books.

Of course, I also liked the Story of O, and enjoy Marquis de Sade. ;)
 
I liked Lolita.
For all the hype, it didn't have a single obscene word in it.
Everything was coy allusion and euphemism.
English was not Vladimir Nabokov's first language, yet he plays around with it brilliantly and outrageously. America was not his homeland, yet Lolita is a quintessentially American road trip novel.
And he's so funny.
One sequence near the beginning, where Humbert's living in Paris and his wife is leaving him for the White Russian colonel/cab driver he calls "Mr. Taxovich", is probably the single most hilarious scene I've ever read in my entire life.
 
Yeah.. I just can't see me enjoying reading something about sexual obsession with 12 yr olds. When it comes to sexual material for my reading enjoyment, I prefer adult participants since that's what I can relate to. Probably why I never bothered with Belinda either.
 
Ok. Yesterday was laundry day. Sat home, read, and did laundry while my husband was out with the kids all day. Got bored of Sleeping Beauty and read the Ruins by Scott Smith. Finished it in one day. Probably the best horror novel I've read this year.
 
Ok. Yesterday was laundry day. Sat home, read, and did laundry while my husband was out with the kids all day. Got bored of Sleeping Beauty and read the Ruins by Scott Smith. Finished it in one day. Probably the best horror novel I've read this year.

Hey! I just said I was reading that.
I think the quality of the writing is wretched.
Plus, I've already seen the movie, so I know the ending.
For a combination of these two reasons, I'm having a lot of trouble slogging through it.
 
Hey! I just said I was reading that.
I think the quality of the writing is wretched.
Plus, I've already seen the movie, so I know the ending.
For a combination of these two reasons, I'm having a lot of trouble slogging through it.

You said you were reading The Runes and from the sound of it you thought it sucked. How could anyone think the The Ruins is poorly written? I thought it was a fantastic story. 'Course I didn't know the story going in. I hadn't read anything about it, seen the movie, or even a preview. Just picked it up in line at the grocery store because it's got praise from Stephen King on the cover. He called it the horror story of the century or something. Now I don't know if I'd go that far, but it was damn good. I think you and I are different in that I don't appreciate the technicalities and use of language so much as I'm in it for the story. And the story was original and I couldn't put the book down. Some of the characters were poorly developed but I don't think that mattered much. You didn't really need a good strong grasp of who those people were to appreciate the situation they were in.

I loved it.
 
I LOVED Exit to Eden.

And the Sleeping Beauty books.

Of course, I also liked the Story of O, and enjoy Marquis de Sade. ;)

I find Rice's attempts at porn rather cheesy. It's not her thing. She's not good at it, really. It's hard to write hot stuff that reads well without becoming so perverse it's laughable. She can't do it. Sex books aren't her thing. I remember reading Memnoch the Devil and cringing at her attempts at writing sexy scenes. She's just not sexy and perhaps that's why she can't write sexy. It ends up being funny. Well written sex is hot, not funny.

But it's ok. Rice is good at other stuff and she should stick to that.
 
Exit to Eden was horribly cheesy. :doh The movie was even worse. I have yet to see the movie in its entirety. I simply refuse to ever sit through it. It's painfully awful.
 
I find Rice's attempts at porn rather cheesy. It's not her thing. She's not good at it, really. It's hard to write hot stuff that reads well without becoming so perverse it's laughable. She can't do it. Sex books aren't her thing. I remember reading Memnoch the Devil and cringing at her attempts at writing sexy scenes. She's just not sexy and perhaps that's why she can't write sexy. It ends up being funny. Well written sex is hot, not funny.

But it's ok. Rice is good at other stuff and she should stick to that.

I think her writing is VERY sexy. Hell, her vampire books turned me on. Lestat is one of the sexiest literary characters I've had the pleasure of reading. Oddly though, I wouldn't call any of her stuff perverse. Guess it's all relative. ;) When someone is writing about things that I personally enjoy, I guess it's easier to see it as sexy. :mrgreen:
 
She can write sexy characters. I just don't think she's any good when it comes to the characters actually having sex. I remember some passage where a vampire is lapping up some nun's menstrual blood. As far as oral sex goes that's not my cup of tea. I love reading about sex. However I like when it gets me hot, not so enjoyable when it makes you go eeeew. Some of the stuff in exit to eden was just too stupid for words, in my opinion. But I'm not into master/servant relationships. I don't want a weak guy who wants me to boss him around. Nor do I want some master. Not my thing, I suppose. Rice's written sexual escapades come off as either depraved or comical and rarely is the actual sex fodder for fantasy.
 
The mental junk food glut continues with Escape, by Carolyn Jessup, another runaway FLDS wife.
It's interesting to compare and contrast this memoir to that of Elissa Wall; the two accounts validate each other more than they contradict.
It's interesting, because although the FLDS community is large (it has about 10,000 adherents), FLDS "royalty" is small, consisting of only a few large extended families, a close-knit cadre centered around Warren Jeffs, and his late father, the former prophet Rulon Jeffs.
Both of the women who have written exposes were members of this cadre, insiders either born to or married to powerful men.
The same family surnames appear repeatedly in both accounts: Barlow, Steed, Jessup, Jeffs. A few others. Most of the FLDS members at the Texas compound also bear these names.
Although neither woman mentions the other in her account, it's obvious they must have known one another; both had sisters married to the prophet (first to Rulon, and then, after his death, to Warren). Both mention many of the same incidents, events, and people. Their timelines on the evolution of the FLDS from a fairly liberal offshoot of Mormonism (which believed, for example, that it was okay to drink hot and cold drinks, including coffee, tea, soda, and beer, unlike conventional Mormons) which just coincidentally happened to practice plural marriage, to the extremist version we see today correspond pretty well. Both women agree that the shift to extremism began with the Short Creek raid in the early 1950s, at which time FLDS members began to distrust and withdraw from the outside world, becoming increasingly isolated to the point that the past three generations of FLDS children have been raised having virtually no contact with or knowledge of the outside world.
The extremism accelerated under the rule of Warren Jeffs, who usurped his aging father's power by bullying him into submission, long before the senior Jeffs actually died.
Their situations differed significantly in that Walls was a 14-year-old when she was married off to an adolescent first cousin, while Jessup was 18 when she became one of four wives- and shortly thereafter, one of six- of an elderly man.
Reading the two books pretty much describes the two different destinies that a female raised in the FLDS could expect.

One of the most devastating accusations that both women make is that the FLDS callously turns out the majority of its male children in early to mid adolescence, so that they will not compete with the older males in charge for either power or the affections of the young female members.
Wall's book includes a photograph she took of her teenage brother, on the day her father ordered her sobbing mother to drive him to the highway and leave him there, with only a backpack full of personal belongings and a cardboard sign that read "DENVER". She did not see him again or know of his whereabouts for many years.

It's all very interesting, from a psychological perspective. I like to learn about isolated subcultures that exist within our larger mainstream culture.
 
Last edited:
This book is good...but unimaginably bleak and depressing! :(

Yeah. Turns out I had read it before. Didn't remember the title I guess. But once I got started on it I began to remember.

Now I'm working on a kid's book my daughter wants to read. Levin Thumps and the Gateway to Foo by Obert Skye. I'm only 3 chapters in but it's quite good. The availability of really entertaining book series for children these days is incredible. There are so many books out there written for kids but written well enough that an adult can truly enjoy it. I don't remember having such a wide selection of great stuff when I was kid. I wonder if it was there and I just had no access to it or if the market for childrens sci fi type stories has just widened.

Either way, the kids are really lucky.
 
Yeah. Turns out I had read it before. Didn't remember the title I guess. But once I got started on it I began to remember.

Now I'm working on a kid's book my daughter wants to read. Levin Thumps and the Gateway to Foo by Obert Skye. I'm only 3 chapters in but it's quite good. The availability of really entertaining book series for children these days is incredible. There are so many books out there written for kids but written well enough that an adult can truly enjoy it. I don't remember having such a wide selection of great stuff when I was kid. I wonder if it was there and I just had no access to it or if the market for childrens sci fi type stories has just widened.

Either way, the kids are really lucky.


My favorite series of kid's books was "The Dark is Rising" series. They just made a movie of it but it sucked and didn't follow the books at all. The other series I really loved was the Wrinkle in Time series. Of that series, Many Waters was my favorite.
 
The Post-American World - Fareed Zakaria.
 
I'm rereading Mystic River, by Dennis Lehane.
It was made into a movie, with Sean Penn and Tim Robbins, but I didn't see it.
The book's actually real well-written.
Perhaps tomorrow I'll go to Half-Price and look for more books by this author, as I don't think I've read anything else by him.
 
I'm rereading Mystic River, by Dennis Lehane.
It was made into a movie, with Sean Penn and Tim Robbins, but I didn't see it.
The book's actually real well-written.
Perhaps tomorrow I'll go to Half-Price and look for more books by this author, as I don't think I've read anything else by him.

You should check out paperbackswap.com.
 
Brotherhood of Warriors - Aaron Cohen
HarperCollins / 2008 / ISBN 978-0-06-123615-0 / 273 pp.

The story of Aaron Cohen, an American Jew who travels to Israel to enlist in the IDF. Against all odds, Cohen is accepted as a candidate for the most elite Special Forces unit in the Sayeret. He recounts his two grueling years of counterterrorism training, and his nine months of active service as a CT operator in the West Bank. A unique inside look into perhaps the most elite SF unit in the world.
 
he other series I really loved was the Wrinkle in Time series.

Wow, did you like that? Madeleine L'Engle?
I tried to start those books so many times when I was a kid- like third, fourth grade- and I just couldn't get past the first couple of pages. I knew they were something I ought to like, but something about them was just a huge turn-off. I really can't pinpoint what.
As a result, I never read them (except for the first chapter of "Wrinkle in time", repeatedly).
I could probably still tell you everything that happened in that first chapter, i read it so many times. But I never got any farther.
Another series that tripped me up that way was "The Secret Garden" and "A Little Princess", by Frances Hodgson Burnett.
Never got farther than the first chapter on either one.
I guess that just illustrates the importance of a catchy opening chapter. If a book doesn't catch me in the first few pages and draw me in, I'm not able to get into it at all. It's like it doesn't want me to read it.
 
A Wrinkle In Time is one of the best books I've ever read. It's brilliant and inspiring.
 
A Wrinkle In Time is one of the best books I've ever read. It's brilliant and inspiring.

Well then, it needs a better opening chapter, because I found it terribly off-putting.
 
Just finished The Butcher Boy by Patrick McCabe.
A tight, creepy little narrative.
 
Back
Top Bottom