Stop assuming that I wish the government would kick your door open and throw you in jail just because I am not willing to secede notions that certain things are harmful. This says more about you being a tyrant than it does me.
This is how I think.
1. X is harmful to Z person
2. Z person should work on X on his own
3. That's it. There is nothing after this or before this. X is harmful and Z person should realize that on his own and work on it on his own. That's all.
I forgot that I had such a bitter leaving from here. Somewhere in 2010 I decided that completely abolishing the state was the way to go but I had not yet articulated it. Not sure why I left like such a twat. I do though remember my failure to get the responses I wanted. I hope I can be less narcissistic second time around.
I used to get thanked and responded to a lot on this forum but after doing a few minor changes to my posting habits I've been getting thanked a lot even though I continue to constantly give thanks. The gambling philosophy of "give action, get action" does not apply to social situations where commentary is the commodity in which we trade. While people can clearly see that this is a piss take and that there are many exceptions to these rules; here are some tips on how to maintain a good
I thought only conservative republicans were out to ruin our good times. What happened liberals? Aren't all democrats baby boomer hippies and xbox playing daily show young adults? Why did prop 19 fail? I think I know why. It's because marijuana smoking emits CO2.
Read the rest: http://tomhogtomblog.blogspot.com/20...voted-for.html