Thread: Medai Matters lies, always has, always will

Originally Posted by pbrauer

You are the one that is claiming they are liars, so they are innocent until YOU prove them guilty. And I think your condescension and baiting are against DP TOS.

I posted multiple articles showing instances where MMA lied. Not my problem if you're too blind to accept the facts as multiple sites presented them. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion... but not thier own facts. You want your own facts.

Condescension is not against the rules PB. If it was, you'd have been banned your second day on the board. As for baiting, I respectfully disagree with your opinion on my posts.

Originally Posted by pbrauer

You are the one that is claiming they are liars, so they are innocent until YOU prove them guilty. And I think your condescension and baiting are against DP TOS.

Your own lib pal admits MM are liars yet you cling to them as if they are the gospel. If you want to be taken seriously, pull your head out of the sand. The MediumMatters is the Message. HA HA CHARADE YOU ARE...

Originally Posted by Whovian

I posted multiple articles showing instances where MMA lied. Not my problem if you're too blind to accept the facts as multiple sites presented them. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion... but not thier own facts. You want your own facts.

Condescension is not against the rules PB. If it was, you'd have been banned your second day on the board. As for baiting, I respectfully disagree with your opinion on my posts.

Here is the MM link to your second on the list, where is the lie?
Coulter says if three U.S. cities were attacked, her response would be, "Which three U.S. cities?"* | Media Matters for America

The first on your list, where is the lie?
O'Reilly surprised "there was no difference" between Harlem restaurant and other New York restaurants | Media Matters for America

Originally Posted by pbrauer

It seems to me, Whovian needs to do a little more than Google Media Matters lies and post the resulting links here.

Some would say the same thing about people who simply go to Media Matters.com and post the resulting links here.

Ziiiiing!!

PB... I can't help you if you refuse to actually read the linked pieces, or if you're simply unable to understand them.

BTW... When I post a link saying a certain MMA story is a lie... and my link explains the lie in detail... and you then post the MMA article mine called a lie, and call that proof that MMA did not lie, well, it's just immature and stupid.

Media Matters Lies About Vote Fraud Reporting – Obama Justice Department Talks Tough While Encouraging Fraud « The IUSB Vision Weblog

'someone' is gonna have a snit fit on this post...lol...


“MEDIA MATTERS Watch” : Media Matters’ Falsehoods Exposed!
The linke page has links to the specifics for each of these, exposing MMA for the lying scumbags they are.

1. "Media Matters’ Bogus Attack on Bill O’Reilly’s ‘Culture Warrior’ Rife With Dishonesty and Deception" : A September 2006 attempt by Media Matters to discredit Bill O’Reilly’s Culture Warrior book teems with misinformation and dishonesty. Folks, it’s a long post, but that’s the way it goes.

2. "Media Matters’ Dishonesty Exposed in Bogus ‘O’Reilly Factor’ Study": Are you familiar with any of those questionable "studies" that Media Matters occasionally puts out? A May 2006 "study" claimed that the guest list on FNC’s The O’Reilly Factor is "dominated" by Republicans and conservatives. Our post unequivocally shreds this claim by clearly illustrating how MMatters inaccurately labeled the guests to get their desired result. Check out this post.

3. "Another False Claim From Media Matters; This One on Global Warming": One of Media Matters’ common ploys is to claim that a particular pundit made a "false claim" or "repeated falsehoods." As it turns out, the "falsehood" or "false claim" often isn’t one at all! Here is a good example.

4. "More Misinformation From Media Matters in False Attack on Bill O’Reilly": Here is a nice and easy example of Media Matters getting their data wrong. Honest criticism is one thing … Shoddy research is another …

5. “Where’s the Misinformation?”: A June 2006 post blared the title, "Lauer joined O’Reilly in serving up misinformation on Today." The problem? Media Matters didn’t provide any so-called "misinformation." Oops!

6. "Media Matters Posted Inaccurate ‘Transcript’ To Falsely Claim That Chris Matthews ‘Praised’ Conservative Ad": Isn’t Media Matters’ obsession with Chris Matthews surreal? A July 2006 Hardball segment addressed a controversial television ad from North Carolina Senate candidate Vernon Robinson. Media Matters claimed that Matthews "praised" the ad. No, he didn’t. Read this post, and see how MMatters posted an incomplete transcript to make their bogus claim.

7. "More Deception From Media Matters in False Attack on Ann Coulter": In this post, we take apart Media Matters’ false attack on the endnotes in Ann Coulter’s Godless book. Here are several textbook examples of dishonesty from Media Matters.

I smell another snitty fit oming on from someplace around here... lol

Fact Check: Media Matters Wrong on Card Check Facts | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

Originally Posted by pbrauer

Here is the MM link to your second on the list, where is the lie?
Coulter says if three U.S. cities were attacked, her response would be, "Which three U.S. cities?"* | Media Matters for America

Did you notice this at your link?

* Headline changed

No, of course you didn't; Media Matters can do no wrong. Hopefully at this size you won't be able to skip over it, though.