• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Quick, More Fear!

Deuce

Outer space potato man
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
110,375
Reaction score
64,340
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
FOXNews.com - GPS Jammers Illegal, Dangerous, and Very Easy to Buy
An electronic device small enough to fit in a shirt pocket and big enough to conceivably bring down an airplane can be easily purchased over the Internet. All a terrorist needs is a credit card and $49.

Dear Fox News:

Loss of GPS reception cannot bring down an airplane. Not even conceivably. It just doesn't work like that.

Why is the conservative media so bent on drumming up security fears?
 
Consumer alert scare stories are a dime a dozen.
 
wow, imagine that

pilot 1: we've lost the GPS

pilot 2: oh no, what will we do

pilot 1: i dont know, how ever will we find our way, we were depending soley on GPS to find our way through the air, what if we crash into a cloud or something?
 
God forbid you Jimmies use your dipsticks....:lamo

From the same article.......
"The risk is low for airplanes, which use ground-based radars for guidance and have a back-up navigation system that does not depend on satellites. Military personnel use a private GPS network. But GPS jamming could nonetheless cause confusion in the cockpit as pilots have to switch to back up navigation systems. And maritime shipments that rely on GPS coordinates for finding port locations could face problems as well. "

There really is something to be said for reading over knee jerking.:doh
 
God forbid you Jimmies use your dipsticks....:lamo

From the same article.......
"The risk is low for airplanes, which use ground-based radars for guidance and have a back-up navigation system that does not depend on satellites. Military personnel use a private GPS network. But GPS jamming could nonetheless cause confusion in the cockpit as pilots have to switch to back up navigation systems. And maritime shipments that rely on GPS coordinates for finding port locations could face problems as well. "

There really is something to be said for reading over knee jerking.:doh

So the article contradicts itself from paragraph to paragraph, how is that better?
 
So the article contradicts itself from paragraph to paragraph, how is that better?
I guess the weight of the world and the weight of the intrinsic value of this thread all hangs on the word "conceivably" and if the article was reporting the story as it was related to the reporter. Seems like much adieu about nothing to me, but lets cut even closer to the quick! How the hell is this a "bias" story?:confused:

Seems the operative phrase here is QUICK, more fear evil Fox to me. Might I add, with very little meat on the bone to boot. In fact, this thread OP reminds me of the kind of pay off you get from a Media Matters "expose" both when you read the initial allegation and once you actually read the entire article. You disagree?
 
Last edited:
I'm more concerned about the product itself....Who would even want to buy one of those things anyway? What purpose does it have?
 
I guess the weight of the world and the weight of the intrinsic value of this thread all hangs on the word "conceivably" and if the article was reporting the story as it was related to the reporter. Seems like much adieu about nothing to me, but lets cut even closer to the quick! How the hell is this a "bias" story?:confused:

Seems the operative phrase here is QUICK, more fear evil Fox to me. Might I add, with very little on the bone to boot. In fact, this thread OP reminds me of the kind of pay off you get from a Media Matters "expose" both when you read the initial allegation and once you actually read the entire article. You disagree?

I not sure about bias myself, but Id bet it was intended for people to just read the headline or first paragraph or two and be satisfied.
 
Not sure what youre getting at, I don't have a reason its just a practice that's been well documented among journalists and editors, but I don't know if this writer had that in mind.
 
FOXNews.com - GPS Jammers Illegal, Dangerous, and Very Easy to Buy


Dear Fox News:

Loss of GPS reception cannot bring down an airplane. Not even conceivably. It just doesn't work like that.

Why is the conservative media so bent on drumming up security fears?

The risk is low for airplanes, which use ground-based radars for guidance and have a back-up navigation system that does not depend on satellites. Military personnel use a private GPS network. But GPS jamming could nonetheless cause confusion in the cockpit as pilots have to switch to back up navigation systems. And maritime shipments that rely on GPS coordinates for finding port locations could face problems as well.

Ronald Repasi, the FCC's Deputy Chief for the Office of Engineering and Technology, said selling, importing, owning, or using a GPS jammer in the U.S. is illegal, and he said the agency actively pursues those who use the devices. He said GPS jammers could pose a potential risk if used negligently.

Dear Deuce, try reading the entire article next time.

.
 
The risk is low for airplanes, which use ground-based radars for guidance and have a back-up navigation system that does not depend on satellites. Military personnel use a private GPS network. But GPS jamming could nonetheless cause confusion in the cockpit as pilots have to switch to back up navigation systems. And maritime shipments that rely on GPS coordinates for finding port locations could face problems as well.

Ronald Repasi, the FCC's Deputy Chief for the Office of Engineering and Technology, said selling, importing, owning, or using a GPS jammer in the U.S. is illegal, and he said the agency actively pursues those who use the devices. He said GPS jammers could pose a potential risk if used negligently.

Dear Deuce, try reading the entire article next time.

.

I'm not sure what risk he was talking about, but an airliner is not at risk from this sort of device. At all.
 
Why is the conservative media so bent on drumming up security fears?

From 10 days ago:

Driven to Distraction - Distracted Driving in Ambulances and Police Cruisers - NYTimes.com


Gadgets in Emergency Vehicles Seen as Peril


They are the most wired vehicles on the road, with dashboard computers, sophisticated radios, navigation systems and cellphones. While such gadgets are widely seen as distractions to be avoided behind the wheel, there are hundreds of thousands of drivers — police officers and paramedics — who are required to use them, sometimes at high speeds, while weaving through traffic, sirens blaring. The drivers say the technology is a huge boon for their jobs, saving valuable seconds and providing instant access to essential information. But it also presents a clear risk — even the potential to take a life while they are trying to save one.

Philip Macaluso, a New York paramedic, recalled a moment recently when he was rushing to the hospital while keying information into his dashboard computer. At the last second, he looked up from the control panel and slammed on his brakes to avoid a woman who stepped into the street. “There is a potential for disaster here,” Mr. Macaluso said. Data does not exist about crashes caused by police officers or medics distracted by their devices. But there are tragic anecdotes.

In April 2008, an emergency medical technician in West Nyack, N.Y., looked at his GPS screen, swerved and hit a parked flatbed truck. The crash sheared off the side of the ambulance and left his partner, who was in the passenger seat, paralyzed. In June 2007, a sheriff’s deputy in St. Clair County, Ill., was driving 35 miles per hour when a dispatcher radioed with an assignment. He entered the address into the mapping system and then looked up, too late to avoid hitting a sedan stopped in traffic. Its driver was seriously injured.

The article is talking about cars, not planes, but the concerns it raises about distraction causing accidents are absolutely identical.

It's not "the conservative media bent on drumming up security fears," it's "the media writing scary stories about nonsensical **** because readers slurp it up."
 
God forbid you Jimmies use your dipsticks....:lamo

From the same article.......
"The risk is low for airplanes, which use ground-based radars for guidance and have a back-up navigation system that does not depend on satellites. Military personnel use a private GPS network. But GPS jamming could nonetheless cause confusion in the cockpit as pilots have to switch to back up navigation systems. And maritime shipments that rely on GPS coordinates for finding port locations could face problems as well. "

There really is something to be said for reading over knee jerking.:doh

The opening statement from Fox "An electronic device small enough to fit in a shirt pocket and big enough to conceivably bring down an airplane can be easily purchased over the Internet. All a terrorist needs is a credit card and $49." is pure idiotic fear mongerring. Qualifying statement later do not excuse it's dishonesty. It's a stupid statement. Note the use of "conceivably." You can put that word in front of just about anything you want to say but don't want to take responsibility for saying.
 
The opening statement from Fox "An electronic device small enough to fit in a shirt pocket and big enough to conceivably bring down an airplane can be easily purchased over the Internet. All a terrorist needs is a credit card and $49." is pure idiotic fear mongerring. Qualifying statement later do not excuse it's dishonesty. It's a stupid statement. Note the use of "conceivably." You can put that word in front of just about anything you want to say but don't want to take responsibility for saying.

Pretty much what I'm getting at.

"Q-tips can cause cancer!"

(later in article)

"While there's no link between Q-tips and cancer, the possibility has not been totally ruled out..."
 
Don't be a conspiracy nut. They are simply using fear to sell magazines. Look around, it happens all the time.

I think Democrats have patented the term "conspiracy." It seems like any and all voice against the Democrats is first shot down as a conspiracy, and secondly demonized for not wanting bigger government and more debt. What's it take to ask the bold, tough questions without getting hammered by the drive-by media?
 
QUOTE=Politics101;1058646388]I think Democrats have patented the term "conspiracy." [/quote]

In usage today, the terrm "conspiracy" is used to keep people from asking questions and to keep events from being properly investigated.

It seems like any and all voice against the Democrats is first shot down as a conspiracy,

I wasn't aware of that. Can you give me an example.

and secondly demonized for not wanting bigger government and more debt.

You're saying that Democrats have said, "You're bad because you don't want bigger debt." I don't believe it.

What's it take to ask the bold, tough questions without getting hammered by the drive-by media?

It usually take Jon Stewart or Steven Colbert to ask the bold tough questions. I assume by drive by media, you mean the radio stations people listen to in their cars. That would be hate radio and they will always hammer anyone who doesn't toe the corporate line.
 
FOXNews.com - GPS Jammers Illegal, Dangerous, and Very Easy to Buy


Dear Fox News:

Loss of GPS reception cannot bring down an airplane. Not even conceivably. It just doesn't work like that.

Why is the conservative media so bent on drumming up security fears?

Hell, let's talk on our cell phones while planes are taxing across active runways, or on final approach. Let's just let folks board aircraft with a device that can jam radio and ILS reception, too, while we're at it. What could go wrong?
 
I think Democrats have patented the term "conspiracy." It seems like any and all voice against the Democrats is first shot down as a conspiracy, and secondly demonized for not wanting bigger government and more debt. What's it take to ask the bold, tough questions without getting hammered by the drive-by media?

The Liberals want us to sit back, shut-up and let them make the decisions for us.
 
The world is ending, I tell you, ending! A $50 buck device and now bring down a plane! The terrorists are gonna attack again! H1N1 is turning deadly! The Millennium bug is gonna bite us! Killer bees! Global warming and the perfect storm! The Taliban is coming! Big Brother is gonna take your guns away!


Gather around, people, big daddy will keep you safe. Just give me your valuables for safe keeping, and you can rest easy.

Do only the conservatives do this?
 
Back
Top Bottom