Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > In the news > Bias in the Media



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-09, 10:42 PM   #1
Familiaist


 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 03:10 PM
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,659
Thanks: 518
Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,031 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Veteran Moderator:   
Total Awards: 1

Jihad Watch

I have been realizing that many people cite Jihad Watch as a form of credible academic source, but I would like to take this opportunity to draw line between Jihad Watch and it's umbrella foundation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.jihadwatch.org/about-robert-spencer.html
ROBERT SPENCER is the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center,
David Horowitz's article from FrontPage Magazine 1997.

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=24385
In fact, lots of New Leftists collaborated with America's enemies during the '60s and '70s. Why should they have been any different from the Old Leftists who spied for Stalinist Russia in the 1930s and 1940s like Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White and Ethel and Julius Rosenberg?

As I described in my book "Radical Son," I had my own encounters with a KGB agent in London in the mid-'60s, when I shared the New Left faith. I was wined and dined at London's fanciest restaurants, my gracious host plying me with questions about my employer, the philosopher Bertrand Russell
New Left issssss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.trentu.ca/admin/library/archives/88-020.htm
The New Left Movement was an international movement of the 1960's which consisted of mainly youth and students. The Movement originated in the 1950's "Ban the Bomb" movement. The New Left Movement dealt with such topics as the Vietnam War, Third World liberation issues and Women's liberation movement etc. The New Left Movement criticised the Old Left. They felt that there should be local control of the political process, accessibility to political and social institutions. They advocated confrontations with modern capitalism by dissident intelligentsia, the poor, natives and ethnic minorities. In Canada, issues raised were nuclear disarmament, community organization, separatism, and sexual inequality. The Movement broke apart in the 1970's. (Taken from: "The Canadian Encyclopedia." Vol. II. Edmonton: Hurting Publishers.)
It always intrigued me that Robert Spencer's patron (David Horowitz) went from a New Leftist/ Marxist to a conservative highly interested in Jihadists.

Just a curiosity
__________________
"I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann
Arch Enemy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-09, 11:00 PM   #2
blond bombshell

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: 03-18-10 11:45 PM
Location: uk
Posts: 4,353
Thanks: 439
Thanked 674 Times in 496 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post
I have been realizing that many people cite Jihad Watch as a form of credible academic source, but I would like to take this opportunity to draw line between Jihad Watch and it's umbrella foundation.



David Horowitz's article from FrontPage Magazine 1997.



New Left issssss?



It always intrigued me that Robert Spencer's patron (David Horowitz) went from a New Leftist/ Marxist to a conservative highly interested in Jihadists.

Just a curiosity
maybe he changed his mind.
__________________
The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.
mikhail is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikhail For This Useful Post:
Old 11-20-09, 11:15 PM   #3
Free Market Terrorist


 
chevydriver1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Today 07:03 PM
Location: Newburgh, New York
Posts: 5,933
Thanks: 1,258
Thanked 1,432 Times in 880 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male
Re: Jihad Watch

The only change that these statists liberals made in order to become Neocons is that they traded their Hammer and Sickle for the Ax and sticks. They still support government growth and government in people's daily lives just for a different reason.
__________________
Blog: http://libertarianblue.blogspot.com/
Death to Socialist Liberals and Authoritarian Conservatives
chevydriver1123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-09, 11:30 PM   #4
Familiaist


 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 03:10 PM
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,659
Thanks: 518
Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,031 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Veteran Moderator:   
Total Awards: 1

Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikhail View Post
maybe he changed his mind.
I thought once a Marxist always a Marxist, or maybe I was reading too much into the criticisms of Obama during his campaign.


Haha

Anyways his more personal group "Discover The Networks" boasts the following
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7030
Welcome to DiscoverTheNetworks. This site is a "Guide to the Political Left." It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left and also the institutions that fund and sustain it; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left's (often hidden) programmatic agendas and it provides an understanding of its history and ideas.
This is where the connects Islamic Jihadists with Leftists. Haha which is funny on multiple levels.

Overly, I think he's an opportunist/careerist more than anything.
__________________
"I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann
Arch Enemy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-09, 07:38 AM   #5
Banned

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Seen: 12-30-09 06:40 AM
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,648
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 1,262 Times in 727 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post
This is where the connects Islamic Jihadists with Leftists. Haha which is funny on multiple levels.

Overly, I think he's an opportunist/careerist more than anything.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

The left has been trying to dilute our society & culture for decades via political correctness and multiculturalism.

The only religion that they seem to be OK with is Islam. Probably because the core aspect of Islam is anti-liberty, just as the core aspects of modern leftism is.
The silenced majority is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The silenced majority For This Useful Post:
Old 11-21-09, 09:32 AM   #6
somewhat unambiguous

 
Gardener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Seen: Today 04:22 PM
Posts: 6,087
Thanks: 792
Thanked 2,113 Times in 1,209 Posts
Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post
It always intrigued me that Robert Spencer's patron (David Horowitz) went from a New Leftist/ Marxist to a conservative highly interested in Jihadists.

Just a curiosity
I would be eager to hear ALL his views before calling him a conservative, myself. How does he view women's rights? Gay rights? The Economy? The Environment?

As far as the human rights angle is concerned, since Islamism represents the very antithesis of liberalism, then those who fight it are taking a liberal position -- no matter how they define themselves. Similarly, Those who act as apologists for Islamismn are taking an extremist conservative approach, and again, this no matter how they define themselves.

That a good portion of the far left is just too stupid and conformist to realize what it is supporting tacitly through all the bullsh!t offered up by way of apologia doesn't necessarily mean that those who stand up to Islamism are conservative -- not uless the word conservative now means the desire to conserve liberal principles, which, indeed, may be the crux of a paradigm shift in how we view the terms.
__________________
You lack lust; you're so lackluster. Is that all the strength you can muster?
Gardener is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-09, 09:39 AM   #7
Familiaist


 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 03:10 PM
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,659
Thanks: 518
Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,031 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Veteran Moderator:   
Total Awards: 1

Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gardener View Post
I would be eager to hear ALL his views before calling him a conservative, myself. How does he view women's rights? Gay rights? The Economy? The Environment?
Not entirely sure. Most of his writings seem to be from his more "radical" past.
Quote:
As far as the human rights angle is concerned, since Islamism represents the very antithesis of liberalism, then those who fight it are taking a liberal position -- no matter how they define themselves. Similarly, Those who act as apologists for Islamismn are taking an extremist conservative approach, and again, this no matter how they define themselves.
I have to disagree with you there. Islamists obtain office through Democratic processes if it is available to them (Turkey, Indonesia, Jordan, and let us not forget that the Muslim Brotherhood participates in Egyptian politics)

Whenever there is no opportunity for a Democratic process, then there is violence. You usually find the most extreme of the militant Islamist organizations juxtapose to Western supported, heavily entrenched, regimes.

Quote:
That a good portion of the far left is just too stupid and conformist to realize what it is supporting tacitly through all the bullsh!t offered up by way of apologia doesn't necessarily mean that those who stand up to Islamism are conservative -- not uless the word conservative now means the desire to conserve liberal principles, which, indeed, may be the crux of a paradigm shift in how we view the terms.
I think we have to come to realize that what is "Conservative" in the United States is absolutely not what is "Conservative" in Israel or Yemen (for examples, I am not too keen on Asian, nor African politics)
__________________
"I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann
Arch Enemy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-09, 09:42 AM   #8
Free Market Terrorist


 
chevydriver1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Today 07:03 PM
Location: Newburgh, New York
Posts: 5,933
Thanks: 1,258
Thanked 1,432 Times in 880 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male
Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post
N

I have to disagree with you there. Islamists obtain office through Democratic processes if it is available to them (Turkey, Indonesia, Jordan, and let us not forget that the Muslim Brotherhood participates in Egyptian politics)
In regards to Turkey, their constitution has various safe guards to prevent that country from becoming a Iran or a Saudi Arabia.
__________________
Blog: http://libertarianblue.blogspot.com/
Death to Socialist Liberals and Authoritarian Conservatives
chevydriver1123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-09, 09:47 AM   #9
Familiaist


 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 03:10 PM
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,659
Thanks: 518
Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,031 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Veteran Moderator:   
Total Awards: 1

Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydriver1123 View Post
In regards to Turkey, their constitution has various safe guards to prevent that country from becoming a Iran or a Saudi Arabia.
Haha well nothing can look like Iran or Saudi Arabia (even though Saudi Arabia is slowly reforming... and their slowness makes the U.S. Congress look like roadrunners).

Anywho,
It's not just the Constitution as it's the Kemalist concept and the ethos that surrounds Attaturk.
__________________
"I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann
Arch Enemy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-09, 06:58 PM   #10
Professor
 
lizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 10:38 PM
Location: In an alternate dimension
Posts: 1,411
Thanks: 617
Thanked 477 Times in 348 Posts
Lean: Private
Gender: Female
Re: Jihad Watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post

It always intrigued me that Robert Spencer's patron (David Horowitz) went from a New Leftist/ Marxist to a conservative highly interested in Jihadists.

Just a curiosity
If I am not mistaken, I think I remember reading that Horowitz's parents were communist party members, and if that's the case, he probably does have legitimate insight into the movement, and quite possibly rebelled, just as many of us rebel against our parents' religious ideology or other beliefs.
lizzie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts