• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News caught again

Jackboot said:
You poor, poor pathetic sheep, keep arguing which news agency is more dishonest, all while your wealth is taken from you, truly sad.:(
Click to expand...
Wait, aren't you a leftwinger?
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
We don't need to name posters and say that they have OCD. That would be a personal attack and against the rules.
Click to expand...
Since I've done exactly that type of thing here at DP many times and all in context to the topic at hand I'll spend no time all worried about that.
independent_thinker2002 said:
I didn't ignore it. I admitted that people like this exist here. You ignored that.
Click to expand...
You have done no such thing, stop dissembling.
independent_thinker2002 said:
They are partisan, that's all you have proof of. I doubt you have consulted the DSM-IV for what would qualify as OCD. I think it hurts your credibility when you go over the top like this. It's worse than Bill Frist making a diagnosis after seeing video clips. You would be better off saying FDS (Fox Derangement Syndrome). Are you even qualified to diagnose mental illness in any capacity?
Click to expand...
Oh good lord, you really must have nothing better to do right now eh? I think I'll stick with my tongue in cheek Fox OCD comment and let you call those in question sufferers of Fox DS. Both apply quite well.
independent_thinker2002 said:
Both watch and defend Fox. For the purposes of this discussion, their differences don't matter.
Click to expand...
Liberals and democrats also watch Fox News and "defend" them as you say. I'd say so what here, but that would imply that I'm interested in an answer from you.
independent_thinker2002 said:
The battle for who's most dishonest.
Click to expand...
Is that anything like the Battle of the Network Stars? Because I skipped watching those ridiculous things, and this "battle" you are talking about does not sound even that entertaining.

Now go waste someone else's time, I'm done with you for this thread.:2wave:
 
Sir Loin said:
Since I've done exactly that type of thing here at DP many times and all in context to the topic at hand I'll spend no time all worried about that.
Click to expand...

Aren't you cool? :roll:

Sir Loin said:
You have done no such thing, stop dissembling.
Click to expand...

independent_thinker2002 said:
Sure, they are partisan and selective in their outrage.
Click to expand...

Nice projection. Why not try being honest instead of condescending?

Sir Loin said:
Oh good lord, you really must have nothing better to do right now eh? I think I'll stick with my tongue in cheek Fox OCD comment and let you call those in question sufferers of Fox DS. Both apply quite well.
Click to expand...

Do you even know what it takes to be diagnosed with OCD?

Sir Loin said:
Liberals and democrats also watch Fox News and "defend" them as you say. I'd say so what here, but that would imply that I'm interested in an answer from you.
Click to expand...

I'm not impressed by your posturing here.

Sir Loin said:
Is that anything like the Battle of the Network Stars? Because I skipped watching those ridiculous things, and this "battle" you are talking about does not sound even that entertaining.
Click to expand...

Says the guy who gets all up in arms about the "Fox News is..." threads.

Sir Loin said:
Now go waste someone else's time, I'm done with you for this thread.:2wave:
Click to expand...

LOL, I've heard this from you before.
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
Aren't you cool? :roll:





Nice projection. Why not try being honest instead of condescending?



Do you even know what it takes to be diagnosed with OCD?



I'm not impressed by your posturing here.



Says the guy who gets all up in arms about the "Fox News is..." threads.



LOL, I've heard this from you before.
Click to expand...
meh.jpg
 
Reduced to trolling, huh?
 
Middleground said:
I agree. She pisses and moans about Ann Coulter, yet she's had her on her show a few times, I think. :roll:
Click to expand...

And Ann Coulter routinely gives her a good thrashing whenever they are on together in a one-on-one debate. Nonetheless, I still respect Joy Behar a lot more than I respect mental midgets like Rachel Madcow. At least Behar has the balls to debate the opposite side.
 
K-1 said:
And Ann Coulter routinely gives her a good thrashing whenever they are on together in a one-on-one debate. Nonetheless, I still respect Joy Behar a lot more than I respect mental midgets like Rachel Madcow. At least Behar has the balls to debate the opposite side.
Click to expand...

Maddow asks conservatives to come on her show. They decline. She's a Rhode's Scholar as well.
 
K-1 said:
And Ann Coulter routinely gives her a good thrashing whenever they are on together in a one-on-one debate. Nonetheless, I still respect Joy Behar a lot more than I respect mental midgets like Rachel Madcow. At least Behar has the balls to debate the opposite side.
Click to expand...

Their debates are stupid and laughable. Nothing constructive comes out of them. Anne is an idiot, and Joy is an idiot for inviting her on her show.
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
Maddow asks conservatives to come on her show. They decline. She's a Rhode's Scholar as well.
Click to expand...

What has being a rhodes scholar to do with anything, I believe that David Vitter is one, so is Bobby Jindal, and look how Clinton turned out, lol.:)

This woman is a partisan hack, she is the left wing Hannity, nothing more.
 
Jackboot said:
What has being a rhodes scholar to do with anything, I believe that David Vitter is one, so is Bobby Jindal, and look how Clinton turned out, lol.:)

This woman is a partisan hack, she is the left wing Hannity, nothing more.
Click to expand...

I have never seen her show, so what does she do that's so partisan?
 
Jackboot said:
What has being a rhodes scholar to do with anything, I believe that David Vitter is one, so is Bobby Jindal, and look how Clinton turned out, lol.:)

This woman is a partisan hack, she is the left wing Hannity, nothing more.
Click to expand...

Ah, but I was responding to the comment that she was a mental midget.

Did you miss that part?

BTW, Randi Rhodes is the left wing version of Hannity.
 
Middleground said:
I have never seen her show, so what does she do that's so partisan?
Click to expand...

You are kidding, right?:confused:

If not, just google her name, I am sure you will find page after page of left-wing partisan hackery on display.
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
Ah, but I was responding to the comment that she was a mental midget.

Did you miss that part?

BTW, Randi Rhodes is the left wing version of Hannity.
Click to expand...

I did indeed see that, and I agree. You see, being well educated, this doesn't mean you are not prone to tunnel vision, or extreme common sense deficiency. Just as I believe Hannity is an intelligent man, he just suffers the same tunnel vision that this person does, and it reflects horribly on both of them.

I don't know who randi rhodes is, other then the dead guitarist for ozzy osborne?
 
Jackboot said:
I did indeed see that, and I agree. You see, being well educated, this doesn't mean you are not prone to tunnel vision, or extreme common sense deficiency. Just as I believe Hannity is an intelligent man, he just suffers the same tunnel vision that this person does, and it reflects horribly on both of them.

I don't know who randi rhodes is, other then the dead guitarist for ozzy osborne?
Click to expand...

She was the worst one on Air America. She also besmirches the guitarist's good name.
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
Reduced to trolling, huh?
Click to expand...
More like reduced to having something better to do on Thanksgiving than arguing with you because you don't like how I think on this matter. So I said MEH and left to do other things. And I'm supposed to be "trolling" you here somehow? Right.;)

Now I have read your last post, great for you that you did in fact make a small statement that sorta admits people do I as I say. I guess I missed it for the rest of the post you have submitted. In the end I don't think you "attacking me" as a troll did much for your grasp of what trolling is, much less for your rep as a MOD.

You seem to just want to argue, I've got better things to do on this day of the year. But I will do you the favor of reporting your personal attack and we will see what integrity can be found in that and this forum's response to it.;)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom