danarhea

With the Russia-Georgia war, there are some serious issues.

1) Had Georgia joined NATO, and Russia attacked, would be have had a nuclear war? Members of NATO are required to attack anyone that attacks a NATO member.

2) Had Georgia joined NATO, would Russia have attacked them, knowing that this would have triggered a major war between major powers?

3) What about the Senate's refusal to allow Georgia to join NATO?

4) And what about Obama and McCain, both who support Georgia joining NATO?

These are important questions, but FOX News seems fixated on penises again, this time, the penis of John Edwards. Not to detract from the seriousness of what Edwards did. He is scum. OK, folks, we already know that, but there are some serious news items that need to be discussed. Edwards' political career is toast, so lets move on to South Ossetia. This is still a situation that could possibly blow up and lead to at least a regional conflict involving major powers. So how is FOX News handling this important event? Watch the video clip.

From the time of Clinton's second term to today, Clinton Penis Envy has been the big hit on TV. But wait, folks, there's more. A free bonus. Son of Clinton Penis Envy, starring John Edwards. More hours of fun, brought to you by the Democratic Party and FOX News. Move over Clinton Penis Envy. A new gunslinger is in town, and as he holds his gun in his hand, women swoon, men get jealous, and of course, FOX News salivates (they are gay, you know). That's right folks, it's Son of Clinton Penis Envy, brought to you by the Fair, Balanced, and Horny Channel, coming to you in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and beyond, that is, unless FOX News can find another penis to latch onto before then.

So guys, the moral of the story is you better keep it in your pants, lest someday you find Bill O'Reilly making a grab for it. He wants it bad, so watch out.

__________________
Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2012

Jake Blues

Fox news doesn't have to look far for sexual scandal.Their golden boy Bill O'Reilly was in a sexual harassment lawsuit not very long ago.Of course he paid hush money to keep his name out of the headlines.But for those that that missed it he tried to bed down one of his co-workers and had some rather steamy phone conversations before she hit him with a lawsuit which he settled out of court.Isn't he married?Like Bill always says sex offenders never stop.He ought to know.He only wishes he had Clinton's penis so he could bed down some of those "filthy fox news broadcast babes".The sexual tension and stress must so tough on poor Billy.I geuss that is why they obsess so much over the bj Clinton got!

P/N

You failed to use the word "alleged" in your statement, but I'll forgive you this time. Just because someone accuses someone of something, it doesn't necessarily make it true. If I accused you of having sex with goats, does that make it true? O'Reilly is a celebrity and people are going to take shots at celebrities, it happens each and every day. Bottom line (back on topic of the thread) is I could care less what O'Reilly, Clinton or even Edwards does in his spare time. But the major difference is that O'Reilly is a pundit, he is not a public official, such as Clinton and Edwards were. Edwards looks like a major hypocrite for having done this. His political future is over and FOX News should give it a rest.

__________________
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan

Singularity

Excuse me for saying this, but that's a very one-sided view of the Bill O'Reilly story.

Bill O'Reilly was involved in a sexual harassment lawsuit by Andrea Mackris, the show's producer at the time. However, Bill filed a lawsuit earlier in the day against Mackris for extortion ( O'Reilly: Female Aide In $60M Extort Bid - October 13, 2004), claiming that she was seeking almost $60 million. O'Reilly's story is that if she didn't pay, she'd sue him. Her story is that O'Reilly was describing vivid sexual acts in phone conversations between the two, and later that Fox News was seeking to have her fired because of the lawsuit.

The case was settled when both parties dropped the charges against each other, and no details of the case were made public. This did not stop a few media outlets from printing conjecture about how O'Reilly was forced to pay millions as "hush money", allegations which are unsubstantiated and pure rumor. Story can be found here: Bill O'Reilly, Producer Settle Harassment Suit (washingtonpost.com)

I personally don't think O'Reilly did it. Feel free to believe otherwise, but unlike many liberals and O'Reilly haters, I listen to his show quite often. If there was anything to this, i'd have given the girl a fair shot. But from everything i've heard and read on the subject, she was TOTALLY in the wrong.

My two cents.

independent_thinker2002

From your source:

The settlement has been rumored at 10 million dollars.

__________________
==]:{o

Sir Loin

Having watched the Edwards news over the last two days, how amusing it is to watch the "Fox News is" types pretend that Fox News is somehow the only news cable network that was running the story. All day. On every program. All day long. All night long. CNN and MSNBC both ran the story ad nausem.

Yet somehow we have a thread about Fox doing this. Just Fox.

Chuckle.

__________________
I hate to break this to you but there is no big lie. There is no system, the universe is indifferent.

GottaHurt

The moral of the story is, you should actually watch FOX news in order to make an accurate and informed assessment of their news coverage.

The Olympics, the Georgia-Russian conflict, the Casey Anthony case, as well as the John Edwards story, are the dominating topics that are being reported hourly on FOX news.

The only penis envy fixation that is apparent, is the OP's flaccid attempt to smear FOX news.

__________________
Pain can be such a beautiful thing

Sir Loin

Oddly Fox has been covering exactly the same topics being covered by the rest of the cable news. The local news, network news, newspapers, blogs, morning shows and every other American media source too.

Oh look at what Fox is doing!!!!!!!

Well yes the OP was dumb. In fact, most often the threads here at DP associated with Fox News are routinely dumb. Usually ill informed and frankly so intellectually dishonest that you would think people otherwise trying to appear informed and rational, would stray away from soiling themselves in the "Fox News is" dummy jig.

Middleground

Did you see the piece? Do you call that journalism? I call it a big pile of steaming poop. Even the interviewee wanted to change the subject, and mentioned more than once that the American people wanted more substance to their news. So what does the jackass anchor do? He brings up Edwards again, LOL. What a joke "news" has become.

__________________

GottaHurt

Of course the liberal interviewee wants to change the subject, liberals don't want to talk about this huge scandal, they want to bury it.

John Edwards is still in the middle of a huge lie. He was just in the democratic presidential primaries, how is this not a major news story?

Right now they're tracking the money trail, you know, who paid for what and why, and where the money is coming from.

I'll go out on a limb here and say Edwards will be revising his story soon.